Posted on 04/17/2004 10:32:23 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States refrained from condemning the killing of a top Hamas leader on Saturday and limited its criticism of the assassination to saying it feared for the stability of the Middle East.
Hamas leader Abdel-Aziz al-Rantissi died after an Israeli helicopter fired two missiles at his car in the Gaza Strip. Enraged Palestinians said President Bush shared the blame for his death.
While asking all parties to show restraint, the White House urged Israel to think through the consequences of its actions.
"The United States is gravely concerned for regional peace and stability," the White House said in a statement.
Bush stood with Prime Minister Ariel Sharon three days ago and welcomed the Israeli leader's plan to withdraw Jewish settlements from Gaza and parts of the West Bank, saying that could help get the peace "road map" back on track.
But in a historic shift that has outraged the Arab world, Bush tacitly endorsed Israel's wish to keep some settlements on the West Bank. That broke with Washington's long-held view that the settlements were an obstacle to peace.
In Saturday's statement, the White House said, "Israel has the right to defend itself from terrorist attacks" -- words that may fuel Palestinian anger.
In avoiding a condemnation of the Israeli strike, the statement reflected a formula the Washington routinely uses when Israel targets a Palestinian militant.
Issued under the name of Bush's press secretary, Scott McClellan, the statement labeled Hamas a "terrorist" group responsible for an attack in the northern Gaza strip hours before the Rantissi killing.
A suicide bomber blew himself up at the Erez border crossing in northern Gaza, killing an Israeli soldier.
VOWS OF REVENGE
The U.S. response to the assassination was in stark contrast to condemnations from around the world,
The European Union condemned the killing as unlawful and "not conducive to lowering tension."
A spokesman for U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan said the assassination violated international law and could lead to more violence in the Middle East.
In Gaza, Palestinians poured into the streets to view the wreckage of Rantissi's car and vowed revenge on Israel.
Palestinian Prime Minister Ahmed Qurie accused the United States of giving a green light to the assassination.
He said Bush showed a clear bias by saying on Wednesday that Israel could expect to keep some of the land it captured during the 1967 Middle East war and by appearing to negate any right of return for Palestinian refugees to Israel.
Sharon pitched the Gaza "disengagement" plan as an attempt to break the deadlock after three and a half years blighted by Palestinian suicide bombers and Israeli military crackdowns.
Israeli and U.S. officials have expressed fears Hamas could play a bigger role in Gaza, a power base for the Islamic fundamentalist group, once it is under Palestinian rule.
The outrage in the Arab world at U.S. policies in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is helping fuel support across the region for an insurgency against American occupation in Iraq.
"There are many who just have the assumption we are pro-Israeli, no matter what we say or do," a State Department official said. U.S. officials said the United States had not changed its policy of opposing Israeli assassinations.
"The Israelis do not consult with the United States when they take their military actions," a State Department spokeswoman said. (Additional reporting by Saul Hudson)
Oh, they have. Israel and the U.S. doubtlessly thought this one through together, in fact.
Issued under the name of Bush's press secretary, Scott McClellan, the statement labeled Hamas a "terrorist" group responsible for an attack in the northern Gaza strip hours before the Rantissi killing.
Reuters blames Bush and "Bush's press secretary" for labelling Hamas a "terrorist" group.
Would Reuters persist in this bootlicking of murderers were its reporters the ones murdered in their hundreds by this "militant" group?
Bravo to Bush for finally dropping the hypocrital counsel of "restraint".
Better for us to take out that Irani butt puppet al-Sadr for the murders, mutilations, kidnappings, tortures--
Whack-A-Mole proceeds with all the fairies shrieking.
They would go to Iraq to die against American fighter-bombers rather than go to Israel to fight against Sharon because of their outrage about the Palestinian conflict in Israel?! What unintelligent drivel must fill these reporters' heads!
"Refrain from condemning" my assets!
GW ought to stand up in front of the UN General Assembly and cheer! And then, announce a list of the next targets for elimination - terrorists and rogue regimes alike.
The democraps and eurotrash are gonna holler like a stuck pig no matter what we do; might as well give 'em sumthin to holler 'bout.
Isn't there a saying that says: 'The best defense is having the best offense' We need to stay one step ahead of the far left. Kicking arse and taking names of rogue nations and hostile regimes!
In a day that should be celebrated as another terrosist leader was killed, Tom Daschle is "deeply saddened"
The PC and moral-relativist crowds are gonna kill us all; if we let them.
How do you kill (if you're smart) a poisonous snake? You blow his damned head off! You darn SURE don't try to "negotiate" with it.
Also stated the other way "A good offense is the best defense." The corrolary to that is: A small problem, dealt with properly, never becomes a large problem.
Look at Quaddafi in Libia - it wasn't a stretch in his imagination to see that he was on the "hit list" - so he changed his tune. Even the stupidest of backward savages understands overwhelming force.
Just think of how much better and more free the world would be if the American people would learn to recognise right and wrong, and would have the stones to deal with the problems before they cause us harm. GW and the "adults in charge" understand this; too bad the leftists and traitors (and the sheeple that keep electing them) in our society never seem to learn.
Yawn. Same old, same old. Peace and stability weren't affected after Israel got Yassin. Although granted, it hasn't been all that long ago, things did not get worse.
Palestinians have been on a continual murderous rampage for years. It just can't get worse than that. And it won't get worse than that unless you believe Syria will attack -- which would be an utterly foolhardy move on their part if they did. No, these targeted killings of top terrorists promote peace and stability, not jeopardize it.
I suspect you're correct.
I've said it before, I'll say it again: The world better be glad that I'm not the President - On Sept. 12th, 2001 (my Bday is 9-11) I'd have nuked it all. From the eastern border of Israel to the western border of India, from the southern border of Russia to the Indian Ocean; The entire area would be flat 'n glassy. I'd have told Indonesia, the Phillipines, and selected African nations that they would be next if they didn't get the savages in their midst under control.
The UN and Europe would have raised hell, and Congress might have impeached me, but the future generations of Americans would be alot better off. My God! in this day and age we just can't afford to let a terrorist use a WMD in a major US population center. That means that ALL peoples of the world MUST adhere to civilized behavior - otherwise they are an intolerable threat.
The sad part is, it may yet still have to be done. I pray for GW, and I pray that the "adults" stay in charge for a loooooong time. The PC and psychobabbler crowd will allow terrorists of whatever stripe to kill us all if the loony left takes over.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.