President Bush - Tony Blair Press Conference (Live)

CNN ^ | 16 April, 2004 | CNN

[Dog]

He asked them both to admit their mistakes..

[Eurotwit]

Sky News reported that Kerry wanted to meet with Blair, but Blair was "booked full" :-)

[al baby]

Reporter wants Blair and Bush to admit their mistakes.........what is the heck wrong with these nitwit reporters

Because Hillary has thier fbi records

[babaloo]

Nitwit reporters hiding behind liberal editors and armed with a sea of ink. Pretty much sums it up, doesn't it?

[CougarGA7]

The liberal press just wont give up until they can get something that they can take out of context and use as a Kerry campaign sound bite.

[No Blue States]

LOL!

Tony doesnt seem to be the type of man to consult with traitors such as kerry.

I suspect he will be booked up any time a kerry request for a meeting is made.

Im only surprised by how many from the UK I meet on line who dislike Tony Blair. His decisions obviously arent made according to polls, but like Bush according to his principles.

[Eurotwit]

Blair putting the reporters in their place.

[Destro]

What the hell do you mean by that comment?

"You know, I just -ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm- I'm sure something will pop into my head here in the midst of this press conference, with all the pressure of trying to come up with answer, but it hadn't yet,"

[Keith in Iowa]

>>Reporter wants Blair and Bush to admit their mistakes.........what is the heck wrong with these nitwit reporters.

They won't stop until they've achieved their goal: Give the DNC a soundbite that can be used against Bush sometime between now and the election.

[Mo1]

I just turned it on

Let me guess .. the reporters are asking stupid questions again??

Why does the President have to tell these idiots what Freedom means??

[areafiftyone]

ROFLMAO - Stop that!

[Krodg]

I just saw an article posted at the DUmp where a Labour MP stated that Blair would vote for Kerry if he was a US citizen??

[Eurotwit]

Alright. Now, i hate Andrew Bolton of Sky News.

"Isn't all this talk about handover dealine moot. You mislead your countries.."


Shees.

[OXENinFLA]

No, That wasn't a loaded question.

[Mo1]

what is the heck wrong with these nitwit reporters.

The want a sound bit

[Keith in Iowa]

That was not really such a bad answer, given the original question. Sure, Bush is not the orator Reagan was...there's no reason to nitpick him to death - unless you're really a DNC/DU/Moby plant just itching to cause disruption. Putz.

[TomGuy]

Reporter says there is not link between Saddam and al-Qaeda.

Dope alert!

---

I was listening to Neal Boortz a bit earlier. Neal listed half a dozen conformed connections over the last 12 years between Saddam Hussein/Iraq and bin Laden/al-Qaeda. Yet, Howard Dean was apparently on CNN this morning repeating the line that 'there was no connection between Iraq and al-Qaeda.'

Tell enough lies or tell one lie enough times, and part of it will stick.

The trouble is, few on air counter these lies. Most hosts (even the conservative ones) just let them slide by because most of the time they are shrouded in a talkingpoints rant. Seldom does a conservate host call a lib on the lie.

[freedom1st]

Brit reporter just asked stupid question. Since no WMD have been found, no link between Hussain and Al Queda shown; why did you mislead people by going to war in Iraq.

[Destro]

Like I said I hope Blair does all the "speechifying".

[Eurotwit]

That was Andrew Bolton of Murdoch's Sky News...