To: Broadside Joe
June, July or August would have been the worst time. These would have been the worst time of the year to be in Iraq, which is why starting the action in March was a bad idea -- unless this administration really believed that most U.S. military personnel would have been out of Iraq after 90 days. Perhaps this was exactly what they thought -- but that makes the administration look even more naive and incompetent.
82 posted on
04/16/2004 7:13:48 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
(Alberta -- the TRUE north strong and free.)
To: Alberta's Child
"These would have been the worst time of the year to be in Iraq"
No it would be the worst time to be in chem/bio suits like they were in on the way to Baghdad because of the 'imaginary' WMD's. Never minding the fact that they are a lot harder to fight in. And that the Iraqis had these suits stashed all over the place along with atropine injectors for 'imaginary' nerve agents.
"unless this administration really believed that most U.S. military personnel would have been out of Iraq after 90 days"
It was stated they we would be there for years.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson