To: Broadside Joe
It would have had nothing to do with the weather. In fact, March was probably the absolute worst time of the year to start the military action -- due to the onset of the hot summer months in Iraq. If weather were an issue, they would have waited until October.
65 posted on
04/16/2004 6:57:12 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
(Alberta -- the TRUE north strong and free.)
To: Alberta's Child
"It would have had nothing to do with the weather"
Sure it did.
"In fact, March was probably the absolute worst time of the year to start the military action"
Not really. June, July or August would have been the worst time.
"If weather were an issue, they would have waited until October."
Nope. As was said a million times, you can't keep troops on a high level of alert on an unlimited basis. Their readiness degrades after a certain period of time.
To: Alberta's Child
"It would have had nothing to do with the weather. In fact, March was probably the absolute worst time of the year to start the military action -- due to the onset of the hot summer months in Iraq. If weather were an issue, they would have waited until October."
We were prepared to move much earlier, however the likes of you prevented it and demanded more "international cooperation". Another concession by the administration that is resulting in a "slapping" by those of you on the left!
132 posted on
04/16/2004 7:53:34 AM PDT by
CSM
(Vote Kerry! Boil the Frog! Speed up the 2nd Revolution! (Be like Spain! At least they're honest))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson