Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Broadside Joe
It would have had nothing to do with the weather. In fact, March was probably the absolute worst time of the year to start the military action -- due to the onset of the hot summer months in Iraq. If weather were an issue, they would have waited until October.
65 posted on 04/16/2004 6:57:12 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (Alberta -- the TRUE north strong and free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
"It would have had nothing to do with the weather"

Sure it did.

"In fact, March was probably the absolute worst time of the year to start the military action"

Not really. June, July or August would have been the worst time.

"If weather were an issue, they would have waited until October."

Nope. As was said a million times, you can't keep troops on a high level of alert on an unlimited basis. Their readiness degrades after a certain period of time.
74 posted on 04/16/2004 7:03:37 AM PDT by Broadside Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child
"It would have had nothing to do with the weather. In fact, March was probably the absolute worst time of the year to start the military action -- due to the onset of the hot summer months in Iraq. If weather were an issue, they would have waited until October."

We were prepared to move much earlier, however the likes of you prevented it and demanded more "international cooperation". Another concession by the administration that is resulting in a "slapping" by those of you on the left!
132 posted on 04/16/2004 7:53:34 AM PDT by CSM (Vote Kerry! Boil the Frog! Speed up the 2nd Revolution! (Be like Spain! At least they're honest))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson