Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PORN ACTOR'S HIV INFECTION FREEZES ADULT FILMING
China View ^ | 16 April 2004 | Editors

Posted on 04/16/2004 1:37:22 AM PDT by Robert Drobot

BEIJING, April 16 (Xinhuanet) -- Filming in California's multi-billion-dollar porn industry has been frozen after a popular actor tested positive for the virus that causes AIDS.

Porn actor Darren James tested positive for HIV this week in screening conducted routinely on the industry's 1,200 regular actors.

Industry advocates immediately called for a 60-day moratorium on filming so that others could be tested.

The Los Angeles-based industry normally completes three to four adult films a day.

It must now wait to see if the deadly virus has spread to 14 actresses who had onscreen sex with James, or to the 35 sex partners the women subsequently had.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: aids; hiv; porn; retribution; sex; sin; smite
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 221-232 next last
To: george wythe
I know a lot of times they'll change their minds well before they die from blood loss ---- I'm not sure I think that's hypocrisy or a change of heart.
161 posted on 04/17/2004 3:54:01 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Rainmist
But why are they exibitionists ? There is a reason behind everything. We don't know what happened to these people to make them gravitate towards being in porn.

I wonder. I think a lot get into drugs and then need money for that, some actually don't want to do any real work and figure getting paid to have sex works for them. I think some just got into porn themselves and let themselves go deep into that route --- they did too much sex and are chasing some kind of high they sometimes get --- just like drug addicts. Probably many of the women got into porn to make some boyfriend happy or in an attempt to have boyfriends and don't know any other way to live or maybe like you said were abused and figure it's a good way to make money.

162 posted on 04/17/2004 3:59:41 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot
"Industry advocates immediately called for a 60-day moratorium on filming so that others could be tested."

So I'm to believe that this translates into everyone refraining from all unprotected sex for 60 days, when they haven't refrained from unprotected sex for more than 60 hours for the past several years. Do I have that right?

163 posted on 04/17/2004 4:05:00 PM PDT by Paulie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dpa5923
I do not shed tears when porn actors gets AIDS, nor do I rejoice in their suffering.

Same here --- I don't rejoice --- but I don't care either --- I'm not going to lose any sleep over someone who knew the risks and in such a "career" that serves no useful purpose --- unlike airline pilots, miners, and others who also risk their lives.

I don't believe all suffering is with no purpose and that suffering can't bring salvation. Maybe after some of these people contract AIDS they start to wonder about souls and God, maybe they reconsider the materialistic hedonistic pleasure world that was all they knew and look around for some kind of meaning. Maybe they find something more. Believe it or not --- I actually know someone who is a cancer survivor who said as strange as it might sound she is actually glad they got cancer because of the way she was living --- bitter and complaining --- and the jolt made her open her eyes and change. She said now she thanks God for every day she wakes and appreciates every small thing that went unnoticed before. I actually knew recovering alcoholics say something similar --- they were glad they went to hell and back because they felt their pain made them something they weren't before.

164 posted on 04/17/2004 4:08:46 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
"What it is offensive is to be happy because someone is suffering due to his iniquities. Gloating is not Christian value."

Gloating, oh really WHAT EXACTLY have I said that you accuse gloating.



Proverbs 24:17, 18

17Rejoice not when your enemy falls, and let not your heart be glad when he stumbles or is overthrown,
18Lest the Lord see it and it be evil in His eyes and displease Him, and He turn away His wrath from him [to expend it upon you, the worse offender].


v17 Where is the rejoicing? Who is this "enemy"? Who caused the stumble or is overthrown?

v18 Lest the LORD see it..... see what? And turn away HIS wrath from him.

So you are saying the LORD gave HIV and I am rejoicing and now I will be getting "HIS" wrath....


I'm sorry you really had to dig deep to come up with this, cause I never said that the LORD gave these HIV.


165 posted on 04/17/2004 4:08:50 PM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Campion
Sounds like your God is a cuddly teddy bear

Nope. My vision of God (I'm agnostic) is of a force that created the world and that is no longer involved in the day to day events.

166 posted on 04/17/2004 4:11:09 PM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot
Praise the Lord! His work is a wonder to behold!!!

So I guess you consider sin to be God's wonder? If so, God must have caused these "actors" to sin unknowingly from eternity past in order to receive the glory of His wonderful work of pornography. Thanks for removing all guilt from the participants of this vile profession and transferring it to God, who now becomes the author of evil.

BTW, your delight in the judgement of others is the antithesis of the Love of Christ, which is a work of the Holy Spirit in the lives of all true believers. Jesus himself said to his disciples (when they wanted to call for fire from heaven to consume those who rejected Jesus' ministry), "You do not know what spirit you're of. The son of man came to save lives not to destroy them."

167 posted on 04/17/2004 4:11:35 PM PDT by streetpreacher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Campion
Shutting down the pornography industry, even for a week, is objectively immensely good. Do I rejoice in that? D*mn straight I do.

The original post, and several that followed, rejoiced in death sentences for humans. Do you rejoice over that or not?

And it is better for a sinner to die, rather than to commit one more grave sin, or lead one other person into grave sin.

Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought we were all sinners, including yourself. Should I rejoice if you die?

Incidentally: feel free to call me any names you like. What I'm telling you is just traditional Christianity. You'd better get used to it, because we aren't going away, at least not quietly.

Should we be allowed to own slaves and be able to murder them?

168 posted on 04/17/2004 4:15:46 PM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Bluntpoint
Maybe other "sinners" and "thieves like Oral Roberts, Robert Tilton and Jimmy Swaggard will be given a "dose" of good old God ordained cancer.

I would be much more concerned about the judgement to be meted out for eternity for false teachers as well as the rest of us "except we repent." At least with HIV, there is still time to repent. Some judgements are more merciful than others.

169 posted on 04/17/2004 4:16:01 PM PDT by streetpreacher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
You avoided my question. It's your claim that the porn people brought it on themselves and therefore deserve what they got. I asked you if overeaters that don't exercise also deserve to die and whether you rejoice in their deaths.
170 posted on 04/17/2004 4:19:07 PM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Ganymede
"When a man strikes his slave, male or female, with a rod and the slave dies under his hand, he shall be punished. But if the slave survives a day or two, he is not to be punished; for the slave is his money."

Straight from the Bible. Agree or disagree?

171 posted on 04/17/2004 4:21:32 PM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot
It must now wait to see if the deadly virus has spread to 14 actresses who had onscreen sex with James, or to the 35 sex partners the women subsequently had.

Praise the Lord! His work is a wonder to behold!!!

You are a sad, sad, twisted individual. No wonder so many people have a negative view of Christianity.

172 posted on 04/17/2004 4:22:05 PM PDT by Stewart_B ( Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son. (Dean Wormer))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: feinswinesuksass
http://www.lukeford.com/text2.htm
173 posted on 04/17/2004 4:24:32 PM PDT by Helms (You make me learn by rote 6,666 verses of the Koran and I may kill you too, Allah be praised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: sakic
"Nope. My vision of God (I'm agnostic) is of a force that created the world and that is no longer involved in the day to day events."


No wonder! You are indeed free to be an agnostic, that is your choice. Most on this earth were put here to make a choice, as it is written. There are some who already made the choice, and that is written as well.

Now I do not rejoice over your choice anymore than I rejoice with a porn star being a porn star. I did not write the BOOK, and if you are not interested what the BOOK instructs that is your choice.

I will not ignore what the BOOK instructs, and I have no say in what you or the porn stars latter end will be. MY duty is to plant seeds and it is between the individual and our Heavenly Father whether the seeds grow.
174 posted on 04/17/2004 4:28:01 PM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
Bump to your post.

175 posted on 04/17/2004 4:29:15 PM PDT by k2blader (Some folks should worry less about how conservatives vote and more about how to advance conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sakic
Because they're stupid. Yet, believing that God is punishing them is far more stupid.

It's like those jackass stunts where someone gets hurt --- or those Darwin award things --- it's not so much gloating but it's like "duh!! what did you think was going to happen???" Even if one doesn't believe in God --- then it's Nature punishing them. A woman having sex with 35 different men in a sort time is not acting according to nature because that kind of promiscuity in itself guarantees child who have no clue who their father is, all kinds of sexual diseases being spread. Before AIDS -- and still today -- are diseases like syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydia, herpes and many others --- like they say -- you can't fool mother nature.

176 posted on 04/17/2004 4:35:05 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: sakic
"You avoided my question. It's your claim that the porn people brought it on themselves and therefore deserve what they got. I asked you if overeaters that don't exercise also deserve to die and whether you rejoice in their deaths."

Well when I responded I was not aware you were agnostic.

I will put it to you like this. This flesh body dies no matter what, pron people or bad eaters or innocent babies.

Christ said in Matthew 10:28 And Fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear HIM Which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.

Obviously since you are agnostic you fear more the death of the flesh than death of the soul.
177 posted on 04/17/2004 4:35:42 PM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah; CapnBarbossa; Notwithstanding
Posts like yours, Poo & Cap, are repulsive. What do you not agree with in #6?



178 posted on 04/17/2004 4:39:20 PM PDT by k2blader (Some folks should worry less about how conservatives vote and more about how to advance conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: faithincowboys
You believe promiscuous sex is immoral.

Not just immoral but unnatural as well. You really wouldn't see promiscuity to that kind of extent in any of the mammals. It's always been a disease spreading lifestyle --- there isn't much new with HIV.

179 posted on 04/17/2004 4:39:21 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
When a building filled with innocent people is spared from a terrorist explosion because the terrorist's bomb explodes prematurely killing him instead, we correctly rejoice because evil has been prevented!

No difference here.

None? Really? Cause as far as I know nobody's being forced to watch porn, certainly not buildings full of people. And I'm sure that if it were to happen it would be considerably less unpleasant than being blown up.

180 posted on 04/17/2004 4:42:38 PM PDT by MattAMiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 221-232 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson