Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stylin_geek
OK so the FBI was eroded over 8 years of the Clintons. How come its only an issue now that Bush got embarrassed by former White House counter-terrorism coordinator Richard Clarke?

I'd give Bush & Ashcroft credit for calling for reform if they had done it within a year of Sept 11, 2001. Instead, Bush was saying that everyone was doing a hunky-dory job, and refused to fire a single FBI or CIA bureaucrat who makes six-figures off of my tax dollars. Now, that he has been exposed by Clarke as fiddling over Saddam when he should have been looking for Al Kaida agents, he is trying to blame the CIA and FBI bureaucrats.

3 posted on 04/14/2004 6:27:28 AM PDT by rageaholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Vic3O3; cavtrooper21
Well worth the read.

Semper Fi
6 posted on 04/14/2004 6:31:09 AM PDT by dd5339 (Happiness is a full VM-II and a DEAD AND BURIED AWB!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: rageaholic
It's possible to do a good job while being hampered by regulations. According to what John Ashcroft said, the FBI and the CIA were doing their job, unfortunately, due to government regulations, they were unable to share information neccessary to pursue these people.
9 posted on 04/14/2004 6:34:00 AM PDT by stylin_geek (Koffi: 0, G.W. Bush: (I lost count))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: rageaholic
he has been exposed by Clarke

The only one "exposed" by Clarke...is Clarke.

Although if I were you, defending the odious Clinton administration, I'd use the word "exposed" quite sparingly.

11 posted on 04/14/2004 6:35:55 AM PDT by M. Thatcher (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: rageaholic
The commision has probly realized that by giving creedence to Clarkes book it tightened the noose around its own neck. These hearings were only to be found on C-Span with very little coverage in the mainstream press until they started waving Clark's book around like it was the end all story what happened pre-9/11.

Now that every other TV in the country is watching at least some part of the hearings, the commision has forced itself to do a competent job (I know its a stretch), and for most of the politicians on the panel, they will have to get over the fact that the truth that they find is most likely not the truth that they wanted.
13 posted on 04/14/2004 6:49:39 AM PDT by Delta 21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: rageaholic
Bush was saying that everyone was doing a hunky-dory job, and refused to fire a single FBI or CIA bureaucrat who makes six-figures off of my tax dollars. Now, that he has been exposed by Clarke as fiddling over Saddam when he should have been looking for Al Kaida agents, he is trying to blame the CIA and FBI bureaucrats.

According to Ashcroft's testimony, the problem was not the CIA or the FBI. It was the Justice Dept. and the previous administration who prevented them from doing their jobs with regulations, firewalls, and inadequate funding.

Janet Reno, Hillary and the Zipper-in-Chief are the ones to blame.

18 posted on 04/14/2004 6:58:07 AM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: rageaholic; rudy45
One point to consider is this: perhaps the White House fully expected this commission to turn into the partisan witch hunt it did. Now, the White House cannot be blamed for being partisan, because they are answering questions, being asked by obviously partisan Democrats, and making the Democrats look foolish.

To me, it looks a lot like "Hey, you asked, we answered, don't blame us if you don't like the answers."
37 posted on 04/14/2004 7:57:23 AM PDT by stylin_geek (Koffi: 0, G.W. Bush: (I lost count))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson