To: freepatriot32
The judge, though, said even with the bans, "smokers remain free to associate and assemble as they please, to smoke or not, whether it be in a bar, a restaurant, a city street or any other place where it is permissible to do so."
Oh, I'm free to smoke in a bar as long as it's permissable. That makes sense.
6 posted on
04/13/2004 12:53:48 PM PDT by
motzman
(Kerry: His slogan is a slogan about the inadequacy of slogans.)
To: motzman
Oh, I'm free to smoke in a bar as long as it's permissable. That makes sense.You can do anything they say you can do, what's the problem? It's called freedom,,,,sort of.
9 posted on
04/13/2004 12:58:34 PM PDT by
Protagoras
(When they asked me what I thought of freedom in America,,, I said I thought it would be a good idea.)
To: motzman
"Oh, I'm free to smoke in a bar as long as it's permissable. That makes sense."
The whole suit is about freedom...this judge is on drugs!
10 posted on
04/13/2004 12:59:30 PM PDT by
international american
(Support our troops!! Send Kerry back to Bedlam,Massachusetts!!)
To: motzman
You beat me to it. The funny thing is that the laws they were fighting specifically make it so that it is not permisssable to smoke. Therefore, a smoker is not free to smoke or not. This judge can't possibly have made such a ludicrous claim! Of course, his support of flag burning and homosexuality made it clear what side of freedom he stands for!
24 posted on
04/13/2004 1:35:26 PM PDT by
CSM
(Vote Kerry! Boil the Frog! Speed up the 2nd Revolution! (Be like Spain! At least they're honest))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson