Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal court tosses out N.Y. smoking-ban lawsuit
freedomforum.org ^ | 04.10.04 | By The Associated Press

Posted on 04/13/2004 12:36:33 PM PDT by freepatriot32

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
"The act of smoking is entirely unrelated to any condition of human being. It is simply not on the same elemental plateau as a person's sexual orientation in defining, in existential terms, who the individual is," he wrote.

what in the hell hs this fool been smoking is what i would ldike to know

1 posted on 04/13/2004 12:36:35 PM PDT by freepatriot32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
The fix is in. Bloomberg's prolly leaning on him.


2 posted on 04/13/2004 12:39:37 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
What kind of pansy a** lawyers did these guys hire??? First Amendment rights??, Assembly etc...

This waste of time and money should have never even been considered. The judge was right to throw it out.

I am certain there are better arguments for contesting an outright ban on smoking than reverting to wild interpretation of the Bill of Rights.
3 posted on 04/13/2004 12:41:42 PM PDT by An.American.Expatriate (A vote for JF'nK is a vote for Peace in our Time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion; Gabz
ping!
4 posted on 04/13/2004 12:46:02 PM PDT by annyokie (There are two sides to every argument, but I'm too busy to listen to yours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
IMO: we have too many judges who just don't get the whole "liberty" thing.
5 posted on 04/13/2004 12:52:04 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
The judge, though, said even with the bans, "smokers remain free to associate and assemble as they please, to smoke or not, whether it be in a bar, a restaurant, a city street or any other place where it is permissible to do so."

Oh, I'm free to smoke in a bar as long as it's permissable. That makes sense.
6 posted on 04/13/2004 12:53:48 PM PDT by motzman (Kerry: His slogan is a slogan about the inadequacy of slogans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *gov_watch; *Constitution List; *BillOfRights; *puff_list; red-dawg; Fiddlstix; RikaStrom; ...
ping
7 posted on 04/13/2004 12:54:39 PM PDT by freepatriot32 (today it was the victory act tomorrow its victory coffee, victory cigarettes...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
I wish a reputable organization would bring some serious suits.
8 posted on 04/13/2004 12:55:41 PM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: motzman
Oh, I'm free to smoke in a bar as long as it's permissable. That makes sense.

You can do anything they say you can do, what's the problem? It's called freedom,,,,sort of.

9 posted on 04/13/2004 12:58:34 PM PDT by Protagoras (When they asked me what I thought of freedom in America,,, I said I thought it would be a good idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: motzman
"Oh, I'm free to smoke in a bar as long as it's permissable. That makes sense."

The whole suit is about freedom...this judge is on drugs!
10 posted on 04/13/2004 12:59:30 PM PDT by international american (Support our troops!! Send Kerry back to Bedlam,Massachusetts!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
I still don't understand how the government can tell a bar or restaurant owner that they cannot permit smoking in their own PRIVATELY OWNED establishment. Am I missing something here?
11 posted on 04/13/2004 12:59:48 PM PDT by sneakers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
Marrero, a 1964 graduate of NYU who was an undersecretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development under President Carter and U.N. ambassador under President Clinton, fondly recalled his time as program director of New York's Model Cities urban development project in the South Bronx.

"My work in the city was sort of front-line work, dealing firsthand with the problems of the poor community," he said. "Seeing the programs that we implemented, using the monies that were given for the South Bronx, was just fulfilling."

Before being appointed in 1999 by Clinton as a federal judge to the Southern District of New York, Morerro specialized in environmental law, real estate law and land-use law.

12 posted on 04/13/2004 1:05:43 PM PDT by monkeywrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sneakers
I still don't understand how the government can tell a bar or restaurant owner that they cannot permit smoking in their own PRIVATELY OWNED establishment. Am I missing something here?

Most people are under the misguided notion that because a bar or restaurant is open to the public, the public has a right to dictate the uses of that property. Thus we have anti-discrimination laws, smoking bans, etc.

13 posted on 04/13/2004 1:06:33 PM PDT by timm22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: monkeywrench
Oops! Got that from here, http://www.nyunews.com/news/campus/6947.html
14 posted on 04/13/2004 1:07:08 PM PDT by monkeywrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
He's probably smoking that ball of string.
15 posted on 04/13/2004 1:09:26 PM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Happily Freeping since January 22, 2003. Dollar Per Day Donor's Club. Member FDIC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
He said "mere conduct such as smoking is not generally considered speech" and is not protected by the First Amendment.

So you can burn a flag but not a cigarette.

We're screwed by black robed tyrants.

16 posted on 04/13/2004 1:11:34 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (Resolve to perform what you must; perform without fail that what you resolve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sneakers
I still don't understand how the government can tell a bar or restaurant owner that they cannot permit smoking in their own PRIVATELY OWNED establishment. Am I missing something here?

No, but I think the attorneys for the plaintiffs missed your point entirely. Private property rights seem to be an alien concept in the Northeast.

17 posted on 04/13/2004 1:20:15 PM PDT by randog (Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Conspiracy Guy
I think we should start selling American flag cigarettes.When asked why your smoking one could just say that they are Flag burning. And its a lot less toxic than burning a polyester flag.
18 posted on 04/13/2004 1:20:57 PM PDT by Dave Burns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dave Burns
Then we could claim free speech. Good idea. Sell it to a cigarette company.
19 posted on 04/13/2004 1:22:37 PM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Happily Freeping since January 22, 2003. Dollar Per Day Donor's Club. Member FDIC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
Smoking is my religion----some religions kill chickens,mine destroys a cigarette,

What's the difference?
20 posted on 04/13/2004 1:23:03 PM PDT by Mears (The Killer Queen--caviar and cigarettes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson