Skip to comments.
Florida Dems Place Newspaper Ad Calling for Rumsfeld 'Hit' (Update)
Drudge Report ^
| April 13, 2004
| Matt Drudge
Posted on 04/13/2004 8:57:32 AM PDT by threat matrix
Edited on 04/13/2004 9:54:35 AM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
'We should put this S.O.B. up against a wall..and pull the trigger'
developing story..
TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: ad; advertisement; bitterseethingdems; bolsheviks; democratsarescum; demssuck; demviolence; domesticterror; domesticterrorists; donaldrumsfeld; extremeleftists; foamymoutheddems; gabber; getarope; hatefilleddems; hateisaleftwingvalue; haters; hatespewingradicals; insurrectionists; kansascitymeeting; kerrydemocrats; leftwingextremists; moveon; needsprozac; newspaper; newspaperad; phaedra; pinellascounty; projectphoenix; proterrorists; rumsfeld; scabber; sedition; seethingleftyhatred; stpetersburg; stpetersburgliberals; terrorists; traitors; violentdemocrats; violentradicals; wackodems; wintersoldiers; yankeesgohome
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 821-833 next last
To: af_vet_1981
Thank you for the reasonable post.
We need to vote a straight Republican ballot and make sure everyone we know does the same. Our war will be political and we have to win in November.
281
posted on
04/13/2004 10:35:54 AM PDT
by
Shooter 2.5
(Vote a Straight Republican Ballot. Rid the country of dems.)
To: PJ-Comix
WHAT?!?! A DUer saying sorry????
282
posted on
04/13/2004 10:35:58 AM PDT
by
smith288
(Who would terrorists want for president? 60% say Kerry 25% say Bush... Who would you vote for?)
To: NYC Republican
Rush said that on The View (ABC television) that one of the women said a WMD should be sent to Bush!!!!It was the large, lovely Star Jones.
To: ken5050; Jim Robinson; Admin Moderator; Lead Moderator; Sidebar Moderator
In a way, I'm serious: my desired course of action isn't publishable on Free Republic.
Jim Robinson et al have very high standards. (Martha Stewart Mode) And that's a GOOD thing.
Kudos, Jim, for running a tight ship.
284
posted on
04/13/2004 10:36:32 AM PDT
by
Poohbah
(Darkdrake Lives!)
To: Preachin'
Yes, Sec. of Def. Rumsfield has protection. This should definitely be reported.
I hope this is taken very seriously. I have a feeling it will be.
These people are trying to capitalize on the "blood" of our troops. This is the most sickening thing I've ever witnessed. But like someone else in this thread said, it shouldn't surprize anyone that someone associated with KERRY would spit on troops serving this country! Not if it will further KERRY'S political career! He did it before.
Those who have been LISTENING to our Government know (knew) that insurgents would be picking up their attacks as the June 30th deadline neared. We had the memo from the captured "messenger" (whose name escapes me at the moment) that forewarned of it. It said if they could't stop the turnover, they will have lost! *NEWS FLASH* You've lost!
Our Government already knows there are people from Syria and Iran involved in the latest uprising in Fallujah! Was ANYONE LISTENING to Paul Bremer on Sunday 4-11-04? There are countries bordering Iraq that DO NOT want Iraq to be a Democracy!
On Bill O'Rielly last night they discussed how News Organizations made this latest uprising look like it was a MAJOR UPRISING when it wasn't! (I know, sometimes he gets on our nerves too, but he has great guests and sometimes he has valid points).
MY POINT IS: The people who placed this add and who are supporting Kerry are treading on the blood of our troops for political gain. So is the MEDIA! It is disgusting. But OUR problem is we need to realize that their message is working! When I talk to people who are WORKING FULL TIME OUTSIDE OF THE HOME, they are relying on the nightly news for thier information. They REPEAT what they hear or read on the news.
So you better start TALKING BIG TIME to your neighbors and friends!
To: BluH2o
Beat me to it. I was thinking the exact same thing. MS Ken Steinke?
286
posted on
04/13/2004 10:36:50 AM PDT
by
7.62 x 51mm
(• © • ™ • ® •)
To: Badeye
Yet, I recall Bill Clinton specifically blaming "right wing extremists" for Timothy McVeigh. More specifically he blamed "hate radio", and everyone knew he was referring to Limbaugh. He later had to back track and gave the lame spin of 'I meant short wave radio.'
287
posted on
04/13/2004 10:36:58 AM PDT
by
Phantom Lord
(Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
To: ER_in_OC,CA
Let's not forget ole Edna McCall. She, as VP, of this filth, deserves her fair share of phone calls.
To: BaBaStooey
Killing babies..OK..killing baby seals...NOT OK....
289
posted on
04/13/2004 10:37:28 AM PDT
by
ken5050
(Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to propagate her genes.....any volunteers?)
To: ArmstedFragg
The other relevant section 18 USC 115. The defense department is one of those listed in 5 USC 101.
Section 115. Influencing, impeding, or retaliating against a Federal official by threatening or injuring a family member
(a)(1) Whoever -
(A) assaults, kidnaps, or murders, or attempts or conspires to kidnap or murder, or threatens to assault, kidnap or murder a member of the immediate family of a United States official, a United States judge, a Federal law enforcement officer, or an official whose killing would be a crime under section 1114 of this title; or
(B) threatens to assault, kidnap, or murder, a United States official, a United States judge, a Federal law enforcement officer, or an official whose killing would be a crime under such section, with intent to impede, intimidate, or interfere with such official, judge, or law enforcement officer while engaged in the performance of official duties, or with intent to retaliate against such official, judge, or law enforcement officer on account of the performance of official duties, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).
(2) Whoever assaults, kidnaps, or murders, or attempts or conspires to kidnap or murder, or threatens to assault, kidnap, or murder, any person who formerly served as a person designated in paragraph (1), or a member of the immediate family of any person who formerly served as a person designated in paragraph (1), with intent to retaliate against such person on account of the performance of official duties during the term of service of such person, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).
(b)(1) An assault in violation of this section shall be punished as provided in section 111 of this title.
(2) A kidnapping, attempted kidnapping, or conspiracy to kidnap in violation of this section shall be punished as provided in section 1201 of this title for the kidnapping, attempted kidnapping, or conspiracy to kidnap of a person described in section 1201(a)(5) of this title.
(3) A murder, attempted murder, or conspiracy to murder in violation of this section shall be punished as provided in sections 1111, 1113, and 1117 of this title.
(4) A threat made in violation of this section shall be punished by a fine under this title or imprisonment for a term of not more than five years, or both, except that imprisonment for a threatened assault shall not exceed three years.
(c) As used in this section, the term -
(1) ''Federal law enforcement officer'' means any officer, agent, or employee of the United States authorized by law or by a Government agency to engage in or supervise the prevention, detection, investigation, or prosecution of any violation of Federal criminal law;
(2) ''immediate family member'' of an individual means - (A) his spouse, parent, brother or sister, child or person to whom he stands in loco parentis; or
(B) any other person living in his household and related to him by blood or marriage;
(3) ''United States judge'' means any judicial officer of the United States, and includes a justice of the Supreme Court and a United States magistrate judge; and
(4) ''United States official'' means the President,
President-elect, Vice President, Vice President-elect, a Member of Congress, a member-elect of Congress, a member of the executive branch who is the head of a department listed in 5 U.S.C. 101, or the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency.
(d) This section shall not interfere with the investigative authority of the United States Secret Service, as provided under sections 3056, 871, and 879 of this title.
To: threat matrix
cut and paste the ad into an email with the subject line "Today's Democrat Party - not your Grandma's Democrats!"
291
posted on
04/13/2004 10:39:15 AM PDT
by
rocky88
(God made the Idiot for practice, and then He made the School Board. - Mark Twain)
To: aragona
It's becoming progressively harder to avoid the conclusion that we're repeating the political patterns of the mid-19th century. Welcome to 1860.
To: Peach; Mo1
post 117 for that actual ad in case you haven't seen it
How come the paper decided that this should be published? Does their ad dept have no guidelines?
Prairie
293
posted on
04/13/2004 10:39:24 AM PDT
by
prairiebreeze
(America recognizes those responsible for the killing of our troops. It's the Demon-cRATS.)
To: Heatseeker
Does Mary have a pistol permit?...ever see them together on MTP..I swear, wher Cueball starts going nuts..she sits there sipping coffee and shaking her head...One day, live, she's gonna brain him with the mug, or worse..
294
posted on
04/13/2004 10:39:45 AM PDT
by
ken5050
(Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to propagate her genes.....any volunteers?)
To: Grampa Dave
"....The owners/publisher/editors of the California freebe fish wraps are such losers, they can't get a job lying for the LA Slimes, Sac Bee, San Francisco Gayrhonicle or San Jose Jerkury.
So they create these outrageous alternative newspapers and push the rat extremist view in every issue...."
What do you want to bet that these folks get offered lucrative positions by the New York Times or CBS? (Or the BBC!!)
BTTT to keep up with these cowardly crapweasels. Surely they're following this thread over at DirtyUnderpants.com (well, they are if they want intelligent comments)...anybody know what they're saying? Besides that it's a Republican plant and surely Halliburton is behind it?
296
posted on
04/13/2004 10:40:01 AM PDT
by
TheBigB
("You know, beer and porn really DO make the shift go faster." - Tom Servo)
To: threat matrix
This message brought to you by the Party of "tolerance and diversity."
297
posted on
04/13/2004 10:40:03 AM PDT
by
GeorgiaYankee
(Ted Kennedy, Jimmy Carter, Andy Rooney-- providing aid, comfort and talking points to our enemies.)
To: Robert_Paulson2
Shoot
Shovel
Shutup
To: threat matrix
18 U.S.C. Annotated Sec. 2384. - Seditious conspiracy
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both
299
posted on
04/13/2004 10:40:38 AM PDT
by
tort_feasor
( anti-Semitism is not a lifestyle choice)
To: Anubus
I think it was the lack of a second civil war. ......so far, that is. I think we're headed towards a second civil war, and I for one, think we'll win. After all, they don't have any guns!
300
posted on
04/13/2004 10:40:49 AM PDT
by
Ignatz
(Scribe of the Unwritten Law)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 821-833 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson