Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

On Iraq, Bush needs Luck and Time, not Cheap Cynics [good answer to liberal arguments]
Detroit Free Press ^ | Monday April 12, 2004 | Dawson Bell

Posted on 04/12/2004 3:01:28 AM PDT by canuck_conservative

Edited on 05/07/2004 7:13:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Think for a moment about a few of the most important decisions you've made in your life.

Maybe to accept a job offer. Invest your life savings in a new business. Or, on the personal side, whether to end a relationship, get married, have an abortion.


(Excerpt) Read more at freep.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: 911commission; billclinton; condirice; georgewbush; hindsight; hypocrites; iraq

1 posted on 04/12/2004 3:01:29 AM PDT by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative
As I read this, I tend to get a feel of a pattern. Let's not blame President Bush (or Clinton). Bush (Clinton) made the best decisions under the circumstances. And so on. It seems the reverse of the everybody does it excuse used during the Clinton years. Let's go back to 1993, the first WTC attack. What if Clinton got on the tube after that, presented the evidence and rallied the nation against the terrorists as President Bush has attempted to do since 9/11? If he implemented the same policies as Bush has, the liberals and the media would have been all for him and perhaps he would have been thought of as a great president. However, he did not! Though prior administrations had terrorist activity during their watch, it was Clinton's - more so than the others - that failed the citizens. I may be in the minority, but I hold him completely accountable and tell everyone I know that wants to hear that the holes in the ground in NYC is the Clinton legacy!
2 posted on 04/12/2004 3:36:27 AM PDT by 7thson (I think it takes a big dog to weigh a hundred pounds!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 7thson
the liberals and the media would have been all for him

I beg to disagree. The liberal media would not under any circumstances support any action that might be perceived as putting women and children in danger.

All of Clinton's military actions were hands off "safe" bombing with cruise missiles from 30000 feet.

The liberal media does not want the United States to ever, ever have a military option. Vietnam is the only point of reference and the only possible outcome as far as they are concerned. In this respect, they are very much like post-war Germans who can only associate all acts of war with total defeat and destruction.

3 posted on 04/12/2004 6:57:34 AM PDT by Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit (Tax energy not labor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson