[ChiMark]

I'm sure the "Today Show" will lead with this. Great post!

[Old Professer]

Most of today's prominent homosexuals and their advocates live by a clock with no hour hand and numbers that run from 1 to 15.

[KillBill]

While there are many homosexuals who have sex with anyone (I have the misfortune of knowing one), there are also those who do enter into committed relationships. And in an era when the "sanctity" of marriage at the state is violated beyond repair, what harm could allowing gay marriages possibly cause? I mean, how would you feel if they didn't let you get married? The best answer is to ignore them and hope they mind their own business.

"Government governs best when it governs least - and stays out of the impossible task of legislating morality. But legislating someone's version of morality is exactly what we do by perpetuating discrimination against gays." - Barry Goldwater

[ChocChipCookie]

Thanks for posting this. It's good to have some solid research to back up my gut instinct.

[richmwill]

Any "study" from an organization that screams "Support Our Ministry" (why don't they just come right out and say "Send Us All Your Money") gets an immediate red-flag from me.

[little jeremiah]

Homosexual Agenda Ping.

Lots and lots of info here, much relating to the sham right to "gay" marriage. Good to bookmark. Much of this info may be elsewhere as well, but it's definitely worth a read.

Let me know if anyone wants on/off this pinglist.

[governsleastgovernsbest]

I don't believe that homosexual men are inherently more promiscuous than heterosexual men.

The difference, IMHO, is that it's simply harder for heterosexual men to fulfill their sexual desires because women are inherently more cautious about having sex than men.

If women were as willing as men, I believe we'd see hetereosexual men with as many partners as homosexual men.

I think this is partly substantiated by the study's focus exclusively on men. I have a feeling that if lesbian couples were studied we'd find monogamy rates in line with those for heterosexual couples.

Also, I think it's hard for the study to compare apples to apples, since for the time being homosexual marriage is not permitted. So heterosexual marriages are being compared partly with relationships that even if homesexual marriage were an option would not rise to that level of formality.

[biblewonk]

I'm glad it didn't get into their sex habits.

[crv16]

First a disclaimer - I don't support homosexual marriage in any form.

This study is just plain flawed, and I think a lot of people recognize that. First of all, before a man or woman get married, they likely are in relationships with several (or dozens) of people prior to tying the knot. Given that fact, the "average length of heterosexual relationships" is pretty low - maybe the same 1.5 years that a typical homosexual relationship lasts.

You can't compare hetero marriages to homo "relationships" without adding in hetero relationships as well.

[Tribune7]

bump