Skip to comments.
Defiant US says Falluja dead were rebels
The Guardian (U.K.) ^
| 04/12/04
| Rory McCarthy and Julian Borger
Posted on 04/11/2004 6:36:08 PM PDT by Pokey78
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
1
posted on
04/11/2004 6:36:09 PM PDT
by
Pokey78
To: Pokey78
Wither the "Human shield" now?
2
posted on
04/11/2004 6:38:23 PM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: Pokey78
They started it, they should bury their dead and STFU
3
posted on
04/11/2004 6:38:28 PM PDT
by
sgtbono2002
(I aint wrong, I aint sorry , and I am probably going to do it again.)
To: Pokey78
Sounds right... I think I saw about 600 in that crowd cheering at the sight of our guys burned to death and hanging in the street.
To: Pokey78
What I want to know is, did they get "Mr." Sadr, or has he been granted Arafat Immunity by the Bush Administration?
5
posted on
04/11/2004 6:43:37 PM PDT
by
First_Salute
(May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
To: Pokey78
I have been predicting that when the enormity of the defeat of the Jihadists in Fajullah gets to the press, the press will change from "the US is losing" to the "US are brutal bullies" overnight, seamlessly and without apology for being wrong.
To: Pokey78
The ceasefire calls also appeared to be aimed at freeing US troops and resources for a parallel running battle with radical Shia militias, after it became evident that US-led coalition troops were being overwhelmed by the two-front conflict. I believe in the vernacular this is referred to as 'believing what you want to believe.' It is also interesting to note that on the one hand, you have people like Bill Kristol arguing that because we only have 2,000 Marines fighting in Falluja (a number which Kristol is hardly in a position to know is true or not) this shows that we don't have enough troops in Iraq, while the Observer argues the exact opposite that the number of troops fighting in Fallujah is so great that we need to stop the fighting in Fallujah order to free them up to go fight against Sadr's thugs.
Just goes to show that if you listen to the commentators in the media right now, you will end up concluding that they are more than willing to opinionize when they have little or no idea what is going on. .
To: Pokey78
I got your "widespread international concern" right here...
8
posted on
04/11/2004 6:52:36 PM PDT
by
kcar
(Who would OBL vote for?)
To: Pokey78
"Lieutenant Colonel Brennan Byrne said: "What I think you will find is 95% of those were military age males that were killed in the fighting. The marines are trained to be precise in their firepower ... The fact that there are 600 goes back to the fact that the marines are very good at what they do," he said" Lieutenant Colonel Brennan Byrne gets better and better. He deserves his own keyword.
9
posted on
04/11/2004 6:53:18 PM PDT
by
mrsmith
("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice... Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
To: Pokey78
Guess this is only controversial by the media's standards!
10
posted on
04/11/2004 7:02:03 PM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
(AOII Mom -- Support Bush-Cheney '04 -- Losing is not an Option!)
To: vbmoneyspender
The media is not being much help in this war and I'm talking about our own media let alone the arab and euroweenie media. If I were to listen to every speculation they are throwing out there I would be giving up like those who are crying for us to pull out.
To: Pokey78
"Yesterday, the director of the town's general hospital, Rafie al-Issawi, said the vast majority of the dead were women, children and the elderly." I can't believe the audacity of this guy. Does he actually think people will believe that the "vast majority" of dead are women, children and the elderly?? Does he think people will really believe our Marines are such bad shots? Especially when most of the "women, children and the elderly" are hiding inside during all the fighting.
I'll bet his next pronouncement will be that the rest of the dead (those that are not "women, children and the elderly") were little, fuzzy bunny rabbits. And the international press will eat it up.
12
posted on
04/11/2004 7:09:32 PM PDT
by
saquin
To: saquin
Does he think people will really believe our Marines are such bad shots?
You have something there, I think the 'extremee' islamonazis were trying to shoot at us troops, but they kept shooting the people they were hiding behind.. The women, the children, and the elderly...
peace
13
posted on
04/11/2004 7:14:33 PM PDT
by
Flavius
("... we should reconnoitre assiduosly... " Vegetius)
To: Pokey78
If any of the dead were non-combatants, why were they hanging out with the bad guys while the shooting was going on?
To: don'tbedenied
Recent poll showed majority of US citizens said Bush wasn't being tough enough
15
posted on
04/11/2004 7:17:17 PM PDT
by
uncbob
To: Flavius
Actually, I think you're not far off. I don't know why the assumption is made that any civilian casualties were the result of our guys. I was watching a report on CNN (I know!) today about this very subject and the analyst was showing video of the insurgents fighting in Fallujah (taken from Al Jazeera, probably). They were firing from the hip, without aiming or looking through the scope, in great sweeping shooting sprees across streets, alleys. Where do people think those shots land? Not many are landing on our troops. Also, they're lobbing RPGs and mortars, of which not many are landing near our troops. Where do people think those are landing? Maybe on those civilians whose injuries are being blamed on us?
16
posted on
04/11/2004 7:18:44 PM PDT
by
saquin
To: vbmoneyspender
As Wretchard has commented at his blog site:
Never in history have 1,200 men stormed a city of 230,000 in urban combat without extensively using heavy weapons before the US Marines did in Fallujah. This is nothing short of amazing because the 90% of the combat power of an infantry unit is embodied in their heavy weapons. And they were stopped only by a truce, not by enemy resistance. When the Marine casualties from the Ramadi ambush, not part of the Fallujah battle are subtracted, the Marine losses have been spectacularly low by historical standards. They are actually lower than the IDF losses in the smaller Jenin engagement (which used armored bulldozers to clear lanes) and several orders of magnitude beneath the Russian casualties in Grozny, despite the lavish use of armor, artillery and air by the Russians. US forces were never tested in extensive urban combat during Iraqi Freedom. MOUT is no longer theory. It is practice.
To: blandbutmarvellous
Just as a comparison look at what happended during the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising, where the Jewish resistence was compressed in a much smaller area and was much less well armed than the Fallujah thugs are and the Nazis were much more ruthless than the Marines have been in Fallujah. There, the Nazis admitted losing 15 people and suffering over 70 casualties in the fight to retake the Ghetto. This number however was believed to have substantially undercounted Nazis deaths and casualties in order to not cause embarrassment to Himmler, whose people had been in charge of retaking the Ghetto. At the end of the uprising, which lasted over a month, the SS finally had to resort to burning down the Ghetto - but even that didn't kill off all of the defenders, so the Nazis ended up killing the last holdouts by gassing them
See Link
To: saquin
Great point. As if it's only the evil US inflicting any collateral damage.It only makes sense that the maniacal terrorists are the cause of many deaths.
19
posted on
04/11/2004 7:28:30 PM PDT
by
Lijahsbubbe
(savages have no concept of a "Better way of Life", so we'll show them a nightmare of existence)
To: Pokey78
Yesterday, the director of the town's general hospital, Rafie al-Issawi, said the vast majority of the dead were women, children and the elderly. He also added that the vast majority of the damaged buildings were "Baby Milk Factories".

20
posted on
04/11/2004 7:29:59 PM PDT
by
Polybius
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson