Skip to comments.
Abrams Tank Attacked And Destroyed By Insurgents In Iraq
news wires
| 11/04/2004
| Outspot
Posted on 04/11/2004 2:05:53 AM PDT by OutSpot
Can anyone tell me how the Iraqi insurgents are able to penetrate our invincible Abrams tank?
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: abrams; antitank; armor; attacked; iraq; muslims; tank
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-108 next last
To: Steel and Fire and Stone
"Election year politics cannot dictate military strategy."
True, but fighting in a densley populated area means either being very careful - slow and as precise as possible - or killing off a lot of bystanders who you'd rather have pacified than dead and bewailed by their neighbors.
These people are not going to love us but unless you advocate pulling out and carpet bombing the cities there aren't a lot of options.
House to house is the most dangerous combat you can undertake and any piece of equipment can be taken down. [This is not the first M1 shown going up - I'd be a lot more interested in how many of the crew got out OK]
41
posted on
04/11/2004 7:31:18 AM PDT
by
norton
To: Steel and Fire and Stone
We need to recognize that the enemy is IslamNot in our lifetime. Unless some PDB or other secret FINDING describes it that way (it will then become PUBLIC of course) there is NO WAY this will ever be stated publically and as you can tell from our tactics in Fallujah and elsewhere, POLITICS, once again and as is USUAL, dictate the happenings on the battlefield and HENCE, the results.
Is there any doubt that we could pacify any city, or country in a matter of hours IF our Military commanders were told, "PACIFY NOW" using extreme measures as you GENERAL see fit. The ONLY requirement is to LOSE as few of OUR men doing it and KILL as many as the ENEMY as possible. Civilian casualties are not a concern and do this as quickly as possible.
Well it is only a dream it will never happen that way again. WWII is the past and we are so far ahead of everyone, Militarily, that COMPASSION has entered our strategic and tactical military thought process. We never do a bombing run UNLESS and UNTIL all nearby possible civilian casualties are eliminated or minimized to the extent that puts our troops in MORE dangerous situations than would otherwise be necessary.
It stinks, but it is a fact and as frustrating as it is, it will NOT change, unless or until we suffer an NBC attack on our shores.
42
posted on
04/11/2004 7:32:27 AM PDT
by
PISANO
(Our troops...... will NOT tire...will NOT falter.....and WILL NOT FAIL!!!)
To: Poodlebrain
"An infantry company supported by a tank platoon is a formidable force in urban terrain. The tanks are more vulnerable to close range attacks, but the infantry and its fighting vehicles should be able to limit any attacks to frontal attacks which are least prone to success."Valid point, and should add that large part of the infantry task would be to protect the tanks. Tanks provide firepower and/or shock when and where needed. They do not hang around making targets of themselves because they are mechanical objects, symbolic objects, and expensive objects that can be taken out even by simple break-down.
43
posted on
04/11/2004 7:37:28 AM PDT
by
norton
To: SLB; archy; Gringo1; Matthew James; Fred Mertz; Squantos; colorado tanker; The Shrew; Darksheare; ..
Treadhead Ping
44
posted on
04/11/2004 7:44:19 AM PDT
by
Cannoneer No. 4
(I've lost turret power; I have my nods and my .50. Hooah. I will stay until relieved. White 2 out.)
To: OutSpot
Kid with the RPG was propably on the overpass, shot down and hit the engine compartment.
45
posted on
04/11/2004 7:47:58 AM PDT
by
fso301
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
It's in the fourth picture: The strategic XD-15 hyper assault bicycle. You could be closer than you know.
46
posted on
04/11/2004 7:48:34 AM PDT
by
archy
(The darkness will come. It will find you,and it will scare you like you've never been scared before.)
To: OutSpot; MeekOneGOP; B4Ranch; JackelopeBreeder; F16Fighter; Dubya; Sabertooth; JohnHuang2
Jihad warriors got one of our Abrams M1 tanks - ping.
47
posted on
04/11/2004 7:49:52 AM PDT
by
Happy2BMe
(U.S.A. - - United We Stand - - Divided We Fall - - Support Our Troops - - Vote BUSH)
To: Iris7
I have been quiet about this stuff, since the enemy most certainly reads the Free Republic, but the cat is now out of the bag, the horse has run off, and the milk is spilled.So now you are going to give lessons on tank busting?
Being quiet was a good decision.
48
posted on
04/11/2004 7:50:07 AM PDT
by
Cannoneer No. 4
(I've lost turret power; I have my nods and my .50. Hooah. I will stay until relieved. White 2 out.)
To: archy
Does that thing really exist (the XD-15)?
49
posted on
04/11/2004 7:50:42 AM PDT
by
Happy2BMe
(U.S.A. - - United We Stand - - Divided We Fall - - Support Our Troops - - Vote BUSH)
To: Iris7
Anyway, the bottom line is that the Abrams is pretty easy to take out by someone either lucky or skilled. I will not get any more specific. I have been quiet about this stuff, since the enemy most certainly reads the Free Republic, but the cat is now out of the bag, the horse has run off, and the milk is spilled.
Correct. Any tanker who's maintained his vehicle under the desert conditions at the NTC or in Iraq knows one weakness the enemy could have exploited. And there was that turncoat arrested at Ft Lewis who had been attempting to sell details of Abrams vulnerability to Al-Quieda or Iraqi intelligence...who may not have been the only one.
50
posted on
04/11/2004 7:53:30 AM PDT
by
archy
(The darkness will come. It will find you,and it will scare you like you've never been scared before.)
To: armyboy
I think that earlier in the war they were using Russian supplied Kornet (sp?) anti-tank missles.
51
posted on
04/11/2004 7:56:58 AM PDT
by
dljordan
To: canalabamian
There's three kinds of folks in this world: Those who can coun't, and those who can't.
52
posted on
04/11/2004 8:00:47 AM PDT
by
moonhawk
(Actually, I'm voting FOR John Kerry....Before I vote AGAINST him.)
To: been_lurking; Iris7; wretchard
53
posted on
04/11/2004 8:02:46 AM PDT
by
Cannoneer No. 4
(I've lost turret power; I have my nods and my .50. Hooah. I will stay until relieved. White 2 out.)
To: CasearianDaoist
It looks like the just hit it with a cocktail. I do not see structural damage. The penetration hole from a shaped charge is only the size of a dime or so. It's on the inside that it's somewhat more spectacular.
54
posted on
04/11/2004 8:12:00 AM PDT
by
archy
(The darkness will come. It will find you,and it will scare you like you've never been scared before.)
To: demlosers
Except for the appearance of black smoke pouring out of an open hatch. How old is this picture??
55
posted on
04/11/2004 8:12:51 AM PDT
by
Hootch
(So Happy the adults are in charge at the Whitehouse!!!)
To: CasearianDaoist
It looks like the just hit it with a cocktail. I do not see structural damage. Oh, well, that makes it all better then....unless you consider a problem that a molotov cocktail can disable an Abrams tank!
56
posted on
04/11/2004 8:14:32 AM PDT
by
clamboat
To: Poodlebrain
I would gladly trade the effect of a mortar round for the effect of a tank main gun round in urban combat. The plentiful cover available is usually proof against the shrapnel from mortar rounds, but not so from the blast effects of direct fire from a tank's main gun. Right up to the point that the bad guys start firing wire guided missiles at your tanks from beyond main gun range, or from *throwaway* positions inside buildings. And the tank crews only defense against those missiles is WP smoke fire from the mortars that obscures the ability of the missile gunners to track their targets and of the WP to burn out and sever the guidance wires. Thast's the reason every Israeli Merkava tank is itself firtted with a turret-mounted light mortar. Ours aren't.
57
posted on
04/11/2004 8:19:27 AM PDT
by
archy
(The darkness will come. It will find you,and it will scare you like you've never been scared before.)
To: Iris7
Anyway, the bottom line is that the Abrams is pretty easy to take out by someone either lucky or skilled. I will not get any more specific.
Well I will, top, and rear armor is weaker than the front and side armor.
58
posted on
04/11/2004 8:19:54 AM PDT
by
Valin
(Hating people is like burning down your house to kill a rat)
To: Finalapproach29er
Gammon grenade?
59
posted on
04/11/2004 8:26:31 AM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(Never get between the lemmings and the water.)
To: Valin
58 posts about the hardware. Does anyone know how the crew is???
60
posted on
04/11/2004 8:27:22 AM PDT
by
null and void
(<----just the right blend of brains, nuts and sugar.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-108 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson