Skip to comments.
Outrage at new mass slaughter of baby seals
Guardian ^
| 04/11/04
| Mark Townsend
Posted on 04/10/2004 6:53:21 PM PDT by Pikamax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-110 next last
To: oldcomputerguy
Nature already has a superb mechanism for keeping the seal population in check.
Overpopulation is of no concern.
81
posted on
04/15/2004 12:36:06 PM PDT
by
Skooz
(My Biography: Psalm 40:1-3)
To: oldcomputerguy; elbucko; rintense; Skooz; sinkspur; CapnBarbossa; feinswinesuksass
No, actually I adressed it, and so did elbucko. See posts # 69-73 or thereabouts. However, I'm happy to boil it down...
1. The seals eat codfish and others because that is their NATURAL PREY. It is what they are MADE to eat. They don't have a choice. We do. That's why we breed animals to eat.
2. Commercial fisherman collect far more fish in their nets than the seals eat, and some have abused the priviledge grossly; thus depleting fish stocks at a rate the seals couldn't hope to match.
3. Rather than admit the problem in 2, which would require actions on their part to conserve the stocks (as New England fisherman have done, to their profit and benefit), they take the easy (and cowardly) way out and blame the seals.
4. By blaming the seals (for eating their natural prey), they have an excuse to brutally slaughter their young (note: they do not kill the ones who ACTUALLY EAT THE FISH, the adults) so they can sell the pelts.
5. They do so allegedly to offset the "loss" of the depleted fishing grounds, completely ignoring their OWN role in it. Cleaning your own house first, anyone?
6. The Canadian government tolerates this because otherwise, they would have to either a) pay the fishermen welfare; or b) admit the problem of overfishing themselves and take steps to limit it.
7. Due to #6, the whole thing, in addition to being completely depraved and sleazy, also has the bonus of constituting welfare.
Blaming a seal for doing what seals are born to do is like blaming a cat for preferring the taste of mice. Seals do not in any way threaten the survival of the human race by their preference in food. Using the animal's natural instincts as an excuse to profit from its inexcusably brutal slaughter is, to put it politely, sleazier than a Harlem crack-whore.
82
posted on
04/15/2004 12:59:58 PM PDT
by
Long Cut
To: Long Cut
"Blaming a seal for doing what seals are born to do is like blaming a cat for preferring the taste of mice"
Exactly.... cats are next! Bwhahahahahahhaha!!
Actually your posting is exactly correct and the logic works. Let the hunt begin, I am not giving up my cod to the seals!
To: Long Cut
So what about the folks that operate the captive bolt stunners that knock out a cow before it slaughtered? Are they less than human?
What do you know about how the meat you buy at restaurants and supermarkets is produced?
Personally, I don't have any problems with what it going on. There is a market for the fur and this is what it takes to harvest it.
Deal with it.
84
posted on
04/15/2004 1:12:49 PM PDT
by
Little Ray
(John Ffing sKerry: Just a gigolo!)
To: oldcomputerguy
I am not giving up my cod to the seals! There is plenty of cod to go around.
85
posted on
04/15/2004 1:14:42 PM PDT
by
Skooz
(My Biography: Psalm 40:1-3)
To: Little Ray
Once again, cows, pigs, and chickens, among many others, are bred specifically for human use. However, I agree that we have not always treated THEM so gently, either. Of course, that does not mean we do not try to find ways to do so.
Point is, does that excuse the seal slaughter? Or do we as decent, honorable humans find SOMEWHERE to draw the line?
If we cannot draw it at the brutal, torturous killing of baby seals and excusing it by blaming them for the results of our own overfishing, then where, exactly?
Oh, and continually saying, "Deal with it" doesn't count as an argument. Proper men do not ignore or condone brutality.
86
posted on
04/15/2004 1:30:32 PM PDT
by
Long Cut
Comment #87 Removed by Moderator
To: Long Cut
What makes you think you have a right to draw any lines, esp. in regards to another's livelihood?
Worry about humans not critters and weeds.
88
posted on
04/16/2004 6:03:09 AM PDT
by
Little Ray
(John Ffing sKerry: Just a gigolo!)
To: Skooz
"There is plenty of cod to go around."
Do you dream this stuff up?
To: oldcomputerguy
Uh. No.
There is no "cod shortage" and even if there were, this "hunt" is not for the purpose of thinning the seal population so more cod will make onto our dinner plates.
90
posted on
04/16/2004 1:21:37 PM PDT
by
Skooz
(My Biography: Psalm 40:1-3)
To: Skooz
"There is no "cod shortage"
At least you are firmly convinced of your own inaccurate information, maybe you should check out the facts first. While this pertains to the North Sea, the principle remains the same. I believe the word "collapse" could be construed to indicate a "shortage".
http://www.growfish.com.au/content.asp?contentid=981 "Dramatic changes in the abundance of the plankton in the North Sea caused by global warming have led to the collapse in cod stocks, research published in the latest edition of the journal Nature shows. "
To: oldcomputerguy
To: Long Cut
Shoot them, I have a lot of relatives in the Maritimes that would starve or be on the dole without the seal harvest. Up in Canukistan in certain PROVANCES, you have to do what you have to do.
93
posted on
04/16/2004 1:50:00 PM PDT
by
Little Bill
(John F'n Kerry is Swine)
To: oldcomputerguy
Oh, please. Are you so naive and bereft of critical faculties to believe this "hunt" has anything whatsoever to do with reducing the seal population so cod can be more abundant? Do you really expect anyone to believe that?
94
posted on
04/16/2004 2:00:48 PM PDT
by
Skooz
(My Biography: Psalm 40:1-3)
To: Skooz
It is interesting how you change the subject when your assertions are shown to be creations of your imagination.
I don't actually care why they are doing it but I am sure on one thing, seals will be eating one hell of a lot less cod in the final result. I am pretty sure there is no shortage of seals....unlike cod.
To: Pikamax
Wouldn't it be nice if the bleeding hearts got as up set about human babies. !!!!&&&&*****! liberals.
96
posted on
04/17/2004 8:09:11 PM PDT
by
winker
To: winker
"Wouldn't it be nice if the bleeding hearts got as up set about human babies. !!!!&&&&*****! liberals."
My friend, compassion is not for just ONE species.
97
posted on
04/17/2004 8:12:54 PM PDT
by
Thinkin
To: Pikamax
I thought socialist governments were supposed to be all compassionate, all loving, providers of free medical care and protectors of the environment.
Not
tee, hee, hee
To: ASTM366
I would bet the killing of seals will not increase the codfish population. They are taking to many cod now and will just take more. They are hogs.
99
posted on
04/17/2004 8:32:07 PM PDT
by
Big Horn
(A waist is a terrible thing to mind.)
To: oldcomputerguy
It is interesting you accuse me of changing the subject when I did no such thing.
If this had anything to do with the "cod shortage" the targets would be the adult seals. They eat many times more cod than the adults.
This has nothing to do with controlling the seal population for any reason, including the world's supply of cod. Your constant insistence that it is is odd and borders on obsessive.
100
posted on
04/17/2004 8:50:47 PM PDT
by
Skooz
(My Biography: Psalm 40:1-3)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-110 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson