Skip to comments.
White House Releases August 6, 2001 PDB
White House Press Office
| 2/10/2004
| Jeff Gannon, White House Correspondent
Posted on 04/10/2004 3:46:56 PM PDT by Jeff Gannon
Edited on 04/10/2004 4:31:37 PM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
To: Jeff Gannon
Thank you, Mr. Gannon -- most kindly.
41
posted on
04/10/2004 6:37:52 PM PDT
by
Alia
(California -- It's Groovy! Baby!)
To: cincinnati65
Let's see how long it takes for some DUmmy to declare that this was OBVIOUSLY falsified to downplay the Bush role in 9/11. They are just flat out stating that the memo proves Rice lied in her testimony.
To: Mr. Jeeves
Here is the current headline in the internet edition of the Washington Post (as of 10:19 p.m edt) : "Bush Warned of Al Qaeda Attacks Before Sept. 11". The clear implication is that the the President of the United States knew, days before the event (and with specificity) that terrorists were going to hijack airplanes and fly them into buildings. In other words, if Bush had "reacted" to this directive, "9/11" would have been averted.
Of course, when one reads the briefing paper, it is obvious that no such intelligence was imparted. Importantly, that very same document could be written, today, and be just as relevant. This is a media creation specifically intended to impact the election, and the media is vile.
43
posted on
04/10/2004 7:34:59 PM PDT
by
ttdriver
To: Jeff Gannon
The Lefties are jumping all over this as proof that somehow this could have been prevented. I just don't think so. Short of shutting the whole country down for an indefinite period of time, just what Bin Laden would have wanted, what do you do?
The President receives tons of threats every day, which ones are given credence over others.
The only possible way there may have been some kind of prevention, maybe, is if all the intelligence agencies and the FBI had been sharing information. There again though the shear volume of that information is more than all the agencies together can assimilate to analyze. Therefore the reliance on the super computers at the NSA, etc. to sift through this looking for preprogrammed words, etc. for something to be flagged for analysis.
Nothing is as simple as these idiot Democrats and Lefties think it is or more importantly want you to think it is.
This is where is might be time for Bush to contemplate giving a major speech to bring out these points and throwing it right back into the Rats.
.
45
posted on
04/10/2004 7:48:57 PM PDT
by
Mo1
(Make Michael Moore cry.... DONATE MONTHLY!!!)
To: ttdriver
"Bush Warned of Al Qaeda Attacks Before Sept. 11".
And this is as far as most people will go in reading the PDB. The Washington Post and the rest of the "Beijing-like state sponsored" journalists count on just that.
46
posted on
04/10/2004 7:59:59 PM PDT
by
Toespi
(,)
To: cincinnati65
In the midst of all this griping about preventing 9/11 I keep thinking of one nightmare scenario...
If GW had shot down the planes before they hit the buildings, would he have been applauded? (I always bless the passengers of Flight 93 that saved us from such a national dilemna.)
To: Jeff Gannon
BUMP!!
To: Captain Peter Blood
The Lefties are jumping all over this as proof that somehow this could have been prevented.Ask Ted if he had his tires checked the day he murdered Mary Jo.
49
posted on
04/10/2004 9:15:00 PM PDT
by
quantim
(Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson