Skip to comments.
Rice Testimony Reveals Security Failures [Blame on Clarke]
FOX News ^
| 4/9/04
| Julia Gorin
Posted on 04/10/2004 4:00:23 AM PDT by Gothmog
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:39:34 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
In 1997, three men in a Brooklyn shack
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 1997; 911commission; condoleezzarice; dianadean; foiled; hamas; juliagorin; ricetestimony; richardclarke; september10th
I wonder if Clarke held meetings with the 'principals' right after this averted attack to 'shake the trees' and find out about future attacks. That's his whole spiel, right? If he had done what he advocates (or, as some would say, his job) he certainly would have stopped the 9/11 attacks in 1997.
Or maybe he's just a bureaucrat whining about not getting 'face time' with the president.
1
posted on
04/10/2004 4:00:24 AM PDT
by
Gothmog
To: Gothmog
Not to mention Clarke wanted the number 2 spot at Homeland Security and Rice blocked his promotion since she felt him unfit. Gee wonder why the so called "news media" doesn't report any of the background info on Richard Clarke?
2
posted on
04/10/2004 4:03:35 AM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(Vote Bush 2004-We have the solutions, Kerry Democrats? Nothing but slogans.)
To: Gothmog
I suspect that Clarke was not trusted by a lot of those who worked with him. He comes across as an arrogant weird nutbag.
3
posted on
04/10/2004 4:18:12 AM PDT
by
tkathy
(nihilism: absolute destructiveness toward the world at large and oneself)
To: Gothmog
Thanks for posting this. A great read.
4
posted on
04/10/2004 4:28:13 AM PDT
by
Iowa Granny
(Impersonating June Cleaver since 1967)
To: Endeavor; Dog; Timeout
Interesting stuff here.
5
posted on
04/10/2004 4:31:17 AM PDT
by
Iowa Granny
(Impersonating June Cleaver since 1967)
To: Gothmog
6
posted on
04/10/2004 4:31:33 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
To: Diogenesis
Great toon!
To: tkathy
"I suspect that Clarke was not trusted by a lot of those who worked with him. He comes across as an arrogant weird nutbag. If Clarke hadn't been given lesser responsibilities or fired, then I'd say his superiors were negligent. Clearly Clarke shares Clinton's inability to be honest. My hope is that eventually (sooner the better), enough of the truth comes out so that even the more ardent Democrats/Clinton supporters become so disgusted they can no longer live in their denial about who and what it is they've been defending.
Thank God we survived eight years of their government. How much damage to our national security has been done? As bad as this sounds, maybe we got off lucky that it's only been the attacks of 9/11. Imagine...what if Gore had become president instead of Bush?
8
posted on
04/10/2004 5:09:29 AM PDT
by
GBA
To: Gothmog
bttt...very interesting but not widely published in the partisan, lamestream media.
9
posted on
04/10/2004 5:16:01 AM PDT
by
harpu
To: Gothmog
Dickie Clarke is a Bigot Racist that would love to LYNCH Dr. Rice for demoting him!
To: TexasCajun
The Democrats (DU) are up in arms about fears that Republicans are going to disclose personal information about Clarke. I get the feeling that they are dissapointed that Republicans haven't disclosed such information.
Democrats have come very close to disclosing it themselves just so they can blame Republicans.
11
posted on
04/10/2004 6:24:42 AM PDT
by
bayourod
(To 9/11 Commission: Unless you know where those WMDs are, don't bet my life that they don't exist.)
To: tkathy
He'd fit right in with the Jimmah Cahtah Administration.
To: Eric in the Ozarks
He'd fit right in with the Jimmah Cahtah Administration. Self righteous prig with no ability see truth in a mirror.
13
posted on
04/10/2004 7:35:19 AM PDT
by
Tom Bombadil
(There are givers and takers. Be a giver and marry one.)
To: bayourod
"The Democrats (DU) are up in arms about fears that Republicans are going to disclose personal information about Clarke" You mean like that he is a past member in the Aryan Nation, belongs to a Satanic Cult, is a cross-dresser, his favorite sexual position is "Tied" and his hobbies include pulling wings from flies and burning ants with a magnifying glass. Stuff like that1? But heck, that would only endure him even more to the demoncRATS. (maybe not the Aryan Nation stuff)
However what WOULD be his downfall would if it was 'leaked' that he reads the Bible, went to church every Sunday and has every Anita Bryant album ever made. Now that'd kill him!
#1: I have no idea if any of that is true, in fact I made it up. BUT a full disclosure by Clarke would clear things up.
14
posted on
04/10/2004 7:43:05 AM PDT
by
Condor51
("Diplomacy without arms is like music without instruments." -- Frederick the Great)
To: Tom Bombadil
You remember 1976-1979, too, eh ?
To: Gothmog
"Or maybe he's just a bureaucrat whining about not getting 'face time' with the president."
Facetime. Low/mid-level staffer. Lack of recognition, lack of status
Years of hard work, resentment that his contributions are not getting him moved up the ladder.
Consider Clarke's recent blowup as the equivalent of "going postal" by longtime staffer.
Now he gets his recognition, his 15 minutes, his book proceeds. Now he is "somebody."
All it cost him was his integrity. Not surprised, since he donates to democrats.
Most striking from his testimony was admission, under oath, that had all his recommendations been implemented, it wouldn't have prevented 9/11/2001.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson