Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Destro
I mean Sudan is a death zone for Christians - why would we trust them to hand over Osama?

Doesn't matter now whether they would have or wouldn't have. He chose not to pursue it.

24 posted on 04/09/2004 2:08:23 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Democrats want to ban sex with animals! They may get hurt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: VeniVidiVici
He chose not to pursue it.

Sudan was never ever going to hand anyone to Washington especially Osama. The problem was that we were negotiating with Sudan - a sign of cupidity and stupidity - when we should have sent in a kill team.

The scandal is that we negotiated and actually thought Sudan would hand OBL over not that Clinton failed to get Sudan to hand him over. You people actually think those negotiations were legit? Would have paid off?

Sudan was suckering us so Osama could escape to Afghanistan. I find it shocking that Clintonistas were stupid enough to think negotiations with Sudan would produce Osama and I find it shocking some Freepers think so too. I repeat negotiations with a jihadist regime in Sudan is the real scandal!

Too complex a concept?

46 posted on 04/09/2004 2:18:01 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson