Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu
722-"Misstatement on your part. Outright lies actually. STOP LYING!"


seems to me it was you who said:

698 "I NEVER said there should be no restrictions period. Never, not once, not even close to it."

504-"The people ... What is a corporation's duty to them? Corporations have a duty to investors and share holder, and nobody else. Deal with it.
504 posted on 04/12/2004 4:05:49 PM CDT by discostu "
734 posted on 04/14/2004 8:57:26 PM PDT by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 722 | View Replies ]


To: XBob
Yeah, those two statements are not mutualy exclusive. Corporate duty != restrictions. Corporations have no duty to the people that are not investors and shareholders, their corporate duty to people that are investors and shareholders is to provide them with a return on their investment via profit. But people DO have a duty to place reasonable and well thought out restrictions on corporations, this is a legitimate function of government and society, but they need to understand what corporations do and how they work so that they can think these restrictions through and understand what they will actually accomplish.
735 posted on 04/14/2004 9:03:48 PM PDT by discostu (Brick urgently required, must be thick and well kept)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 734 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson