[XBob]

709 - "You've got to think restrictions through, understand their impact on business, understand business' ability to go elsewhere, understand cost of compliance. "

Now, show me just where you have said that previously, in all your posts on this thread?, or any thread for that matter, I haven't read them all.

[discostu]

Here's where I mention in a post specifically to YOU about reasonable restrictions:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1114631/posts?page=561#561
Reasonable restrictions can be placed on them, but they must be REASONABLE and well thought out.

And here's where I first mention cost of compliance:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1114631/posts?page=497#497
Your problem is that you take things to far. Duty to the law is achieved through duty to profit, breaking the law is usually unprofitable. Of course sometimes following the law is unprofitable, look up "cost of compliance" in regards to environmental regulation, especially look it up in relationship to Bush's time as governor of Texas.

There's plenty of other places in this thread where I mention REASONABLE and WELL THOUGHT OUT restrictions as a GOOD THING. But since that doesn't fit inside your insult ridden box I'm sure you just ignored them completely.