Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu
I never said "only contribution" I said "only DUTY". Very different.

Exactly. As Adam Smith said, "IT IS NOT FROM THE BENEVOLENCE OF THE BUTCHER, THE BREWER, OR THE BAKER THAT WE EXPECT OUR DINNER, BUT FROM THEIR REGARD TO THEIR OWN SELF-INTEREST"

These merchants weren't benefitting society because they were nice, but because their greed produced goods which benefit society.

Countries where it is difficult or impossible to reduce costs, headcount or do other "mean" things have much higher unemployment and much lower standards of living. But at least those lucky job holders can feel more "secure" than Havoc.

477 posted on 04/12/2004 11:08:46 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 476 | View Replies ]


To: Toddsterpatriot
Well some benefit society because they're nice. Profitable and beneficial is a comfy bed for the mind. But when push comes to shove the duty of the company will always be profit and if that becomes bad for the society the society needs to ask itself why their needs are no longer aligned with the needs of their economy. Anytime good business is bad for a society that society has issues that need resolving.
478 posted on 04/12/2004 11:17:22 AM PDT by discostu (Brick urgently required, must be thick and well kept)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 477 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson