Skip to comments.
Tet II?
The John M. Ashbrook Center for Public Affairs ^
| April 2004
| Robert Alt
Posted on 04/09/2004 9:29:59 AM PDT by quidnunc
Baghdad, Iraq The media hailed the recent battles in the Sunni Triangle and the coordinated attacks orchestrated by radical Shia cleric Muqtada Al Sadrs militia as evidence of a new crisis in Iraq. The Guardian, for example, referred to the conditions in Iraq as being "[o]n the brink of anarchy," and the New York Times opined that "the events in Falluja[h] and the other cities on Sunday appeared likely to shake the American hold on Iraq more than anything since the invasion
" It wasnt long before Senator Ted Kennedy waded into these deep political waters, declaring Iraq to be "Bushs Vietnam." Unwittingly, the Senator may be onto something. The recent round of attacks bears a striking resemblance to a particular battle in Vietnam the Tet offensive a battle that America decisively won on the ground, but lost in the press.
To understand the similarities between the Tet offensive and recent activity in Iraq, it is necessary to revisit both. In the Tet offensive, the North Vietnamese forces abandoned guerilla tactics to launch a massive coordinated assault across South Vietnam. They engaged hard targets, including the United States embassy, which they stormed but never actually entered. While U.S. casualties were high, the military scored a major victory, putting down the offensive in a matter of days, and inflicting astronomical casualties on the opposing North Vietnamese forces. However, the images of the fighting at the embassy and the medias emphasis on U.S. casualties led Americans to believe that the U.S. had suffered a major setback.
In Iraq, anti-Coalition elements likewise abandoned guerilla warfare this past Sunday for a series of coordinated attacks on hard targets designed to be spectacular or, more precisely, media spectacles.
(Excerpt) Read more at ashbrook.org ...
TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iraq; media; robertalt; tet; vietnam
1
posted on
04/09/2004 9:29:59 AM PDT
by
quidnunc
To: quidnunc
There were more than 70,000 Viet Cong involved in the Tet Offensive. The standards sure have gone down in the past 35 years..
2
posted on
04/09/2004 9:44:25 AM PDT
by
AntiGuv
(When the countdown hits zero, something's gonna happen..)
To: All
I had to give up my box I was donating so much to Free Republic
|
 Thanks for the pic sciencediet :0)
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
To: quidnunc
In the Tet offensive, the North Vietnamese forces abandoned guerilla tactics to launch a massive coordinated assault across South Vietnam.
Freaking idiot doesn't know a damn thing about the Vietnam
war, no point in reading further.
4
posted on
04/09/2004 9:47:55 AM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: quidnunc
I cannot believe someone has not thrown a net over this guy yet.
This is not Tet because this is not Vietnam.
The reason we are in this part of the world is because people there, and not just Iraqi's, have failed to take responsibility for their governments. Sadly, these people suffer the consequences of their inaction. As a result, these governments have run amok subsidizing and supporting terrorists who would act these same governments self loathing and inadequacies at being unable to act as responsible leaders. It is unbelievable that in 4500 to 5000 years of civilization (?) democracy is still not understood in this part of the world, with the exception of Israel.
5
posted on
04/09/2004 9:51:44 AM PDT
by
abc1
To: tet68; RussianConservative
Can you elaborate for my benefit? I am curious because there used to be a freeper here who was closely allied with islamic terror-types. Fusion was his name. He said over and over that that Bosnian islamic terrorists had studied our military history and strongly believed that Tet was our weakest time.
He said they planned to re-do that kind of offensive whenever possible against us. Which makes this post interesting to me.
6
posted on
04/09/2004 9:53:57 AM PDT
by
MarMema
(Next Year in Constantinople!)
To: MarMema
The Tet "offensive" decimated the VC cadres (NOT to be confused with "North Vietnamese" as the author seems to be
doing. Far from being a time of weakness for the US it would
have marked the end of the chances for NVA success, yet the
propaganda efforts by leftist media icons destroyed any
semblence of that reality and turned it into a "Defeat".
Any resemblance between what is happening in Iraq and "Tet" are purely wishful thinking in the minds of the leftists.
7
posted on
04/09/2004 9:58:54 AM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: quidnunc
It appears the "Iraqi Tet" offensive may already be over, for the most part..
Although I wonder what the hell is going on with the "humanitarian aid" going into Fallujah...
That's about the most idiotic thing I have ever heard of.. Right in the middle of your show of strength and resolve, you take a "time out" to exhibit weakness in the face of the enemy...
( Maybe it's some sort of subtle "psychological warfare" designed to give insurgents enough confidence to attack again.? )
8
posted on
04/09/2004 10:03:12 AM PDT
by
Drammach
(Freedom; not just a job, it's an adventure..)
To: MarMema
MarMema wrote:
Can you elaborate for my benefit? I am curious because there used to be a freeper here who was closely allied with islamic terror-types. Fusion was his name. He said over and over that that Bosnian islamic terrorists had studied our military history and strongly believed that Tet was our weakest time. He said they planned to re-do that kind of offensive whenever possible against us. Which makes this post interesting to me.Even though it was a resounding military victory for our side, the Tet offensive was a strategic defeat for the U.S. because this was the event which turned American public opinion against the war in resdponse to negative media reports.
9
posted on
04/09/2004 10:08:03 AM PDT
by
quidnunc
(Omnis Gaul delenda est)
To: quidnunc
brute?
10
posted on
04/09/2004 10:09:47 AM PDT
by
isom35
To: isom35
isom35 wrote:
brute?Huh?
I think you need to flesh your question out just as bit.
11
posted on
04/09/2004 10:12:55 AM PDT
by
quidnunc
(Omnis Gaul delenda est)
To: quidnunc
In my opinion, I would welcome a "Tet" style offensive, The only thing that Ive disagreed with the pres on is that he declared the end of combat too soon. A major conventional push by the insurgents would be slapped down much quicker than the guerrilla/terroristic tactics that are going on now.
To: tet68
Any resemblance between what is happening in Iraq and "Tet" are purely wishful thinking in the minds of the leftists.
There are very real similarities.
1. The enemy is being beaten back with sever loses.
2. The Liberal Press is siding with the enemy as an active propaganda arm.
13
posted on
04/09/2004 10:16:12 AM PDT
by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: quidnunc; tet68
Thanks. It sounds like the approach they are seeking, according to Fusion, is to sway public opinion. Which is perhaps what was behind the burned bodies being hung on the bridge...
14
posted on
04/09/2004 10:23:18 AM PDT
by
MarMema
(Next Year in Constantinople!)
To: quidnunc
ET II, Tedius?
15
posted on
04/09/2004 10:32:09 AM PDT
by
kabar
To: tet68
But one analogy is apt:
Our enemies are getting their butts kicked military and yet they manage to 'win' the PR war.
And there is one common theme: A media that is out to spread anti-americanism, despair, and ignores any consideration of the success of our endeavor.
16
posted on
04/09/2004 11:41:06 AM PDT
by
WOSG
(http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com - I salute our brave fallen.)
To: quidnunc
The Tet Offensive I fear is if Islamicists in the U.S. coordinated an attack on Synagogues on Yom Kippur.
17
posted on
04/09/2004 11:42:45 AM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(If opposites attract, John Kerry must really like himself!)
To: quidnunc
a very poor joke attempt on my part. Et tu, Brute?......
Tet II, Brute? long live mst3k.
18
posted on
04/09/2004 7:31:28 PM PDT
by
isom35
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson