Skip to comments.
FDA kept suicide findings secret
ajc.com ^
| 04/06/04
| ELIZABETH SHOGREN
Posted on 04/07/2004 7:56:26 PM PDT by Nov3
WASHINGTON -- Ten months ago, when concerns arose about a possible link between children taking antidepressant drugs and suicide attempts, senior officials at the Food and Drug Administration ordered their leading expert to head up an examination of the evidence.
EMAIL THIS PRINT THIS MOST POPULAR
When the government scientist filed his report last winter, however, his bosses decided to keep it secret even though it found that children who took the drugs were twice as likely to be involved in serious suicide-related behavior as those who did not.
Instead of revealing the findings, senior FDA officials ordered more studies, which are not expected to be completed until summer. They also squelched plans to have the author, Dr. Andrew Mosholder, present his conclusions to an FDA advisory committee when it took up the issue in February.
Mosholder's report still has not been made public, but news of his conclusions first surfaced in a CBS News report last week. His findings were detailed in an internal FDA document obtained by The Los Angeles Times and authenticated by government officials.
In March, when the agency issued a warning about the possibility of problems for young patients taking the drugs, FDA officials said no conclusive scientific evidence existed on the link between antidepressants and potentially suicidal behavior by children. Officials said they based their action on anecdotal complaints from physicians and families that had been presented to the advisory committee.
They gave no hint that their own chief expert on the subject had examined the results of more than two dozen clinical trials conducted by antidepressant manufacturers and had found an unusually high correlation between their use by young patients and potentially suicidal behavior.
(Excerpt) Read more at ajc.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: antidepressants; bribery; drugcompanies; fda; health; healthcare; homocide; mentalhealth; prosac; suicide
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
To: Nov3
http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame/recent.html
Table of Contents
Aspartame Ingestion Causes Formaldehyde Accumulation in the Body
Aspartame and MSG Cause to Painful Fibromyalgia Symptoms
Aspartame and Brain Tumors (Swedish Study)
Aspartame Causes Memory Loss
There's some evidence nutrasweet/aspartame was a factor in Gulf War Syndrome. Heat generates formaldehyde; all that pop sitting out in the desert sun, people drinking it all day...
41
posted on
04/07/2004 10:51:40 PM PDT
by
jedi
(Pre-digested opinions are so much simpler to assimilate)
To: MHGinTN
The Charles River Labs scandal involved collusion between a scientist at Searle and employees at CRL who misrepresented study results. I'm not understanding the accusations regarding Smith Kline.
42
posted on
04/08/2004 5:36:25 AM PDT
by
harrowup
(Just naturally perfect and humble of course)
To: junaid
I don't know what the new hype is about. In medical school we were told that giving a severely depressed patient an anti-depressant may cause them to commit suicide. That isn't the issue. If you are currently practicing medicine, you should know that.
The issue is drug-induced agitation (akathisia) and the real rates of drug-induced psyschosis. Just from reading the above article, it should be apparent to you that when you have twice the rate of suicidality from taking the active drug in placebo-controlled trials, there is something wrong. This is especially true considering that the trials were conducted by the drug companies themselves, with the inherent biases that produces.
43
posted on
04/08/2004 6:30:13 AM PDT
by
Al B.
To: junaid; Nov3
I should have included the rest of your point in my above post to make it clear what you were saying:
The theory was that these patients had suicidal thoughts, but did not act on them secondary to the lack of energy that accompanies depression. By giving the antidepressant, that lack of energy goes away, but the suicidal thoughts may not have gone away. This leads to the suicide attempts.
Nov3 -- thanks for the heads up on this story.
44
posted on
04/08/2004 6:44:40 AM PDT
by
Al B.
To: nmh
We were horrified at what they allowed others to do to their daughter. Their daughter is considered a "success story" in medical circles - rescued from the brink of suicide. From your description this girl is deeply disturbed. Electric shock - done painlessly - is THE MOST EFFECTIVE treatment for depression. The SSRI's of which fluoxetine [trade name Prozac] is the 1st line pharmacologic basis for the treatment of depression/anxiety (also OCD). These drugs are a God-send to so many people. These drugs are nontoxic, and are good for depressed folks because you cannot overdose on them.
45
posted on
04/08/2004 7:35:47 AM PDT
by
RoyaltyBoughtWithBlood
("Am I therefore become your enemy because I tell you the truth"? (Galations 4:16))
To: MarkL
Your story is a lie or you have no clue what drugs you were on, but considering the "non-specific" details, my money's on a lie
46
posted on
04/08/2004 7:38:26 AM PDT
by
RoyaltyBoughtWithBlood
("Am I therefore become your enemy because I tell you the truth"? (Galations 4:16))
To: shield
These drugs cause adults to kill their whole families. Andrea Yates was one of them. Yates was an post-partem psychotic, not your normal run of the mill depressed or anxious person. She's a case study, not a rule.
47
posted on
04/08/2004 7:42:40 AM PDT
by
RoyaltyBoughtWithBlood
("Am I therefore become your enemy because I tell you the truth"? (Galations 4:16))
To: RoyaltyBoughtWithBlood
I can't imagine in my wildest dreams that electic shock treatment is effective for anything but torture. In fact I thought they had banned this barbaric treatment. BTW, she has lost some memory from it. Yeah ... real effective ... with that and Prozac she's turned into a freak. She was NEVER this off before electric shock and Prozac.
48
posted on
04/08/2004 7:56:02 AM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: nmh
I can't imagine in my wildest dreams that electic shock treatment is effective for anything but torture. Antipsychotics were also used to torture people in the Russian Gulags. But that hasn't stopped American psychiatry from embracing these "miracle" therapies.
49
posted on
04/08/2004 8:00:23 AM PDT
by
Al B.
To: nmh
I can't imagine in my wildest dreams that electic shock treatment is effective for anything but torture. In fact I thought they had banned this barbaric treatment. BTW, she has lost some memory from it. Patient's do not feel any pain - it's NOT torture - the shock resets brain neurons with the release and new manufacturing the exact neurotransmitters deficient in depression. The fact that your "dreams" do not synch with the treatment is not a basis for therapy. Short-term memory deficits are a side-affect of the treatment. It's better than suicide, and there is no evidence to sugest that any deficits are permanent.
She was NEVER this off before electric shock and Prozac.
She's also a teenager. I'm sure that has nothing to do with her current situation. I understand it's easier to blame the drugs and the treatment.
50
posted on
04/08/2004 8:09:04 AM PDT
by
RoyaltyBoughtWithBlood
("Am I therefore become your enemy because I tell you the truth"? (Galations 4:16))
To: Al B.
Antipsychotics were also used to torture people in the Russian Gulags Anti-derpessants are not anti-psychotics
51
posted on
04/08/2004 8:10:22 AM PDT
by
RoyaltyBoughtWithBlood
("Am I therefore become your enemy because I tell you the truth"? (Galations 4:16))
To: RoyaltyBoughtWithBlood
It appears to me that you have an excuse for everyone who becomes violent while on Prozac. I wonder why that is ... . It seems obvious that these drugs are ineffective and only harm the patient more.
52
posted on
04/08/2004 8:11:31 AM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: RoyaltyBoughtWithBlood
Anti-derpessants are not anti-psychotics LOL. Thanks for the tip, but I was simply trying to amplify a statement about psychiatric treatment as torture.
Actually, given the spate of evidence emerging about SSRI-induced motor problems like tardive dyskinesia, there may not actually be a lot of difference in the side effect profile of antipsychotics and "Anti-derpessants."
53
posted on
04/08/2004 8:19:12 AM PDT
by
Al B.
To: RoyaltyBoughtWithBlood
"Patient's do not feel any pain - it's NOT torture - the shock resets brain neurons with the release and new manufacturing the exact neurotransmitters deficient in depression. The fact that your "dreams" do not synch with the treatment is not a basis for therapy. Short-term memory deficits are a side-affect of the treatment. It's better than suicide, and there is no evidence to sugest that any deficits are permanent."
Me: Really? Then you ought to tell that to THIS girl. It terrified her. Your view of Prozac does not match up with reality. Memory deficits are not acceptable nor is this barbaric ineffecive treatment acceptable. It's sadistic. Sadism is not superior to a drug and treatments that promote suicide. She was also NOT suicidal. I do know of others from years ago that had shock treatment and the memory deficits REMAIN.
Me: She was NEVER this off before electric shock and Prozac.
"She's also a teenager. I'm sure that has nothing to do with her current situation. I understand it's easier to blame the drugs and the treatment."
Even the doctors could NOT guarantee that her brain would NOT be affected by Prozac. They openly admit that they do NOT have long term or short term studies on its effects on a DEVELOPING brain. When the drugs are treatment are harmful, and uncertain as well as seriously serving no useful purpose it is RIGHT tio blame them and stop using them. Apparently you are a drug pushed with a sadistic uncaring streak.
54
posted on
04/08/2004 8:20:16 AM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: nmh
It appears to me that you have an excuse for everyone who becomes violent while on Prozac. Excuse? Where? No, the problem is with the disease that the drugs are treating not the drugs themselves. If anyone is making excuses it is you - blaming the drugs.
It seems obvious that these drugs are ineffective and only harm the patient more.
That is because you are a lay person only superficially knowledgeable in the phamacologicaly basis for psychiatric medicine. A few anectdotes - your experience being - do not paint an entire picture, furthermore you are not a trained professional knowledgeable of all of the "ins and outs" of the case.
Similar arguments are made to outlaw hand-guns based on school and workplace shootings. Isolated incidents are just that isolated and are not a basis for policy or therapy.
55
posted on
04/08/2004 8:23:09 AM PDT
by
RoyaltyBoughtWithBlood
("Am I therefore become your enemy because I tell you the truth"? (Galations 4:16))
To: Al B.
there may not actually be a lot of difference in the side effect profile of antipsychotics and "Anti-derpessants." All psych drugs have their side-effects, and often dyskinesia is a trade-off for sanity. Furthermore, dyskinesia with SSRI is very rare and dose and drug dependant. In other words, one SSRI might cause a problem at any specific does and the side-effects can be corrected by either changing the drug or changing the dose.
There are NO similarities between antipsychotics and SSRI's, but I wouldn't expect a lay person who has not studied this to understand that.
56
posted on
04/08/2004 8:33:34 AM PDT
by
RoyaltyBoughtWithBlood
("Am I therefore become your enemy because I tell you the truth"? (Galations 4:16))
To: nmh
All the physicians with all their years of training and all the years of research needed to approve a drug and or treatment are wrong, and you are right - based on what?
It's clear to me that you do not understand ANY of this.
57
posted on
04/08/2004 8:37:02 AM PDT
by
RoyaltyBoughtWithBlood
("Am I therefore become your enemy because I tell you the truth"? (Galations 4:16))
To: RoyaltyBoughtWithBlood
Your story is a lie or you have no clue what drugs you were on, but considering the "non-specific" details, my money's on a lieMighty big words there... A lie... Nope... Prozac and Lithium. I wound up dropping out of SUNY Stony Brook because of the incident. I'd love for you to talk to my friends who experienced the case.
Of course, nobody EVER had a bad reaction to drugs, right?
Mark
58
posted on
04/08/2004 8:49:41 AM PDT
by
MarkL
(The meek shall inherit the earth... But usually in plots 6' x 3' x 6' deep...)
To: MarkL
Of course, nobody EVER had a bad reaction to drugs, right? Didn't say that. Your story doesn't synch though something about it is either wrong or you lied.
59
posted on
04/08/2004 8:56:52 AM PDT
by
RoyaltyBoughtWithBlood
("Am I therefore become your enemy because I tell you the truth"? (Galatians 4:16))
To: RoyaltyBoughtWithBlood
Neither... I don't take kindly to being called a liar either.
Mark
60
posted on
04/08/2004 9:00:55 AM PDT
by
MarkL
(The meek shall inherit the earth... But usually in plots 6' x 3' x 6' deep...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson