Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq Council discusses deal to end Shi'ite violence (by Not Prosecuting Al-Sadr!)
reuters ^ | 4/7/04 | Reuters

Posted on 04/07/2004 9:07:18 AM PDT by Mark Felton

BAGHDAD, April 7 (Reuters) - Iraq's U.S.-installed Governing Council has discussed a proposal not to prosecute the rebel cleric Moqtada al-Sadr for murder if he agrees to halt a Shi'ite uprising, council members said on Wednesday.

They told Reuters after meeting to discuss the violence sweeping Iraq that using more force against the young cleric and his followers could lead to more civilian casualties and bolster support for him.

"Iraq could refrain from pursuing the arrest warrant in return for Moqtada renouncing violence," said one Shi'ite council member, who was speaking on condition of anonymity.

"The situation would be akin to Lebanon's Subhi al-Tufaili, who is contained," he said, referring to the ex-Lebanese Hizbollah Shi'ite guerrilla group leader.

Tufaili is wanted for allegedly killing Lebanese soldiers and trying to assassinate a former Lebanese president years ago, but he roams the Bekaa Valley freely while staying away from vocal politics.

An arrest warrant is out for Sadr in connection with the killing of another cleric who returned from exile a year ago.

The murder of Sayyed Abdel Majid al-Khoei, the son of the late Grand Ayatollah Abu al-Qassem al-Khoei, sparked fears of violent divisions among Iraq's Shi'ite leadership.

Sadr has denied involvement in Khoei's murder. The arrest warrant was issued months ago but was only announced after his followers clashed with U.S. forces last week. The U.S. military says he will be arrested.

UPRISING

The cleric's followers have fought with occupation forces in the southern cities of Nassiriya, Amara, Kut, Kerbala and Najaf, vowing to carry on a revolt that has killed over 130 people since Sunday.

The Governing Council issued a statement denouncing the violence, but was considering taking a proactive stance to end the crisis, council sources said.

"The members will not sign on the plan and no delegation will go see Moqtada unless we are sure he can be contained," said an official with close links to the 25-member council.

"Using more force against him will not work and the Americans know this. Many more will die and even more radical elements could emerge if he is killed," he said.

Council members said previous attempts to integrate Sadr into the U.S.-led political process had failed.

They said a Governing Council delegation secretly met Sadr last year after his supporters fought in Kerbala with followers of Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, regarded as the country's most influential Shi'ite cleric.

Sadr then agreed not to resort to violence but insisted the United States should withdraw its occupation forces from Iraq, they added.

Moderate Shi'ite leaders such as Sistani are seen as wary of being drawn into the conflict. Police in the seminary city of Najaf have allowed Sadr's followers to occupy their stations, and Sistani's followers let them effectively take over the city.

"There is not much Shi'ite holy men like Sistani can do," the council official said. "They are men of religion, not interior ministers."


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alsadr; appeasement; appeasers; council; igc; iraq; iraqcouncil; southwestasia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
Very bad idea...
1 posted on 04/07/2004 9:07:21 AM PDT by Mark Felton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Not a good way to start off your nation. Bribing an alleged murderer with a Get Out Of Jail Free card...
2 posted on 04/07/2004 9:09:32 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: Mark Felton
I suggest making the deal, then stage a fatal attack on him to look like an al qeada operation.
4 posted on 04/07/2004 9:10:10 AM PDT by cripplecreek (you tell em i'm commin.... and hells commin with me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Once the US Democratic Party Presidential Candidate labeled al-Sadr “a legitimate voice in Iraq” you could’t very well expect the Governing Council to disagree.
5 posted on 04/07/2004 9:10:26 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All


Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER



6 posted on 04/07/2004 9:10:51 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Capitulation? No f-ing way.
Why are our boys fighting and dieing?

This punk is responsible for my nephew getting seriously injured yesterday in Iraq.
We better kill the bastard or I will take it way too personally.
Kiss heis ass? You gotta be kidding.
7 posted on 04/07/2004 9:10:56 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (G.W. Bush in 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
If they do this, they'll totally invalidate that "arrest warrant" they issued the other day, and will make a (further) mockery of the judicial system.

It's not unlike training a puppy: the minute you say "sit," you have to enforce it, even if you don't really care if the puppy sits, because once he believes that you lack the will to enforce your commands, it's all over.
8 posted on 04/07/2004 9:11:41 AM PDT by johnfrink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
This punk is responsible for my nephew getting seriously injured yesterday in Iraq.

Prayers for his recovery.

9 posted on 04/07/2004 9:13:57 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: johnfrink
Why do we take so long and let things like this happen?
10 posted on 04/07/2004 9:14:14 AM PDT by samadams2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Let the "discussion" end with the capture/kill of Sadr. End of story.
11 posted on 04/07/2004 9:14:25 AM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samadams2000
Achmed Chalabi and his bunch are not worthy of deciding on amnesty for the murderer of American troops. Their decision should be given the deference it merits: NONE.
12 posted on 04/07/2004 9:15:52 AM PDT by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sarasota
Let the "discussion" end with the capture/kill of Sadr.

You mean he's still alive?

13 posted on 04/07/2004 9:16:03 AM PDT by Only1choice____Freedom (The word system implies they have done something the same way at least twice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
This is like a skit out of Monthy Python and the killer rabbit... RUN AWAY/RUN AWAY...........
14 posted on 04/07/2004 9:16:58 AM PDT by Silver Bird Worker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: mewzilla
Oh, it's just starting. They'll do things like this all the time.
16 posted on 04/07/2004 9:18:34 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
No deal. Kill them all!
17 posted on 04/07/2004 9:19:02 AM PDT by threat matrix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
You don't understand the real problem here. . . the fact that whatever they think of Sadr, most Iraqis - excluding Kurds - view the Governing Council as a bunch of US puppets.
18 posted on 04/07/2004 9:19:57 AM PDT by Filibuster_60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
Don't blame it on Kerry. You hand car keys over to a toddler, don't be surprised or angry when the car ends up in a ditch-- or worse.
19 posted on 04/07/2004 9:20:31 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
Hey, it gets better. You know how the government executes and enforces its laws via the backing of the military? We're that military. They'll decree stupid things and our military will make sure it is carried out.
20 posted on 04/07/2004 9:23:01 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson