Skip to comments.
Birth certificate refused for child with 2 dads
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| Tuesday, April 6, 2004
Posted on 04/05/2004 10:22:39 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
LAW OF THE LAND
Birth certificate refused for child with 2 dads
Homosexual rights groups threatens suit citing legal precedent
Posted: April 6, 2004
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com
Oklahoma's health department refused to issue a birth certificate to a child with "two fathers."
Two-year-old Vivian has been under the care of Gregory Hampel and Edmund Swaya, in Seattle, Wash., since shortly after she was born in Oklahoma, reports the website Gay365.com
The homosexual-rights group Lambda Legal is arguing Oklahoma law allows for co-adoption.
"The Health Department does not have authority to decide who gets a birth certificate or who is a legal parent," said Brian Chase, staff attorney for Lambda Legal.
Chase said it's "both unlawful and unconscionable to withhold this vital document because of anti-gay prejudice against a child's parents."
Oklahoma State Attorney General W.A. Drew Edmonson recently issued an advisory stating that under the federal Constitution and Oklahoma laws, the state must issue birth certificates for children legally adopted outside of Oklahoma, including to children adopted by same-sex couples, the website said.
Lambda Legal won a similar case for a lesbian couple in Vermont who adopted a baby from Mississippi.
A state judge ordered the state Board of Health to issue a certificate listing both mothers.
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: adoption; birthcertificate; culturewar; downourthroats; homosexualagenda; inourfaces; legaldocument; lyingliars; oklahoma; samesexadoption; samesexparents
To: All
Click The Logo To Donate
2
posted on
04/05/2004 10:24:54 PM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: JohnHuang2
Lovely! They sue for non-complicity in document fraud. Let's pretend that children aren't produced by a man and a woman people... who are you going to believe, Lambda lawyers, or your own lying biology textbook?
3
posted on
04/05/2004 10:26:31 PM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(Voting Bush because there is no reasonable alternative)
To: JohnHuang2
Would not this child already have a birth certificate naming the mother and father?
4
posted on
04/05/2004 10:28:33 PM PDT
by
Spruce
(Never make excuses whether or not it is your fault.)
To: JohnHuang2
de facto gay marriage coming to a safe conservative state near you. uggg.
ummm, where is the real natural mother here?
I hope the kid manages to grow up somewhat normally.
5
posted on
04/05/2004 10:30:52 PM PDT
by
WOSG
(http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com - Disturb, manipulate, demonstrate for the right thing)
To: Spruce
Would not this child already have a birth certificate naming the mother and father? Melissa Etheridge and David Crosby?
To: WOSG
Bump
To: Spruce
Isn't placing false data, ie: the incorrect birth mother and birth father, on a Certificate of Live Birth a crime already?
8
posted on
04/05/2004 10:43:17 PM PDT
by
Spruce
(Never make excuses whether or not it is your fault.)
To: Spruce
"Would not this child already have a birth certificate naming the mother and father?"
That's what I was thinking. But what about cases where people find an abandoned child, I guess the state has to issue that person some kind of birth certificate.
My dad worked for child welfare in NYC once, and named an abandoned baby once. He named him Matthew Fulton, it was in the papers an everything. Too bad my dad has gone to his reward, so I can't ask him abouth the birth certificate thing. Maybe people who are adopted do get new birth certs. That would explain why sometimes people don't know they were adopted.
9
posted on
04/06/2004 5:27:10 AM PDT
by
jocon307
(The dems don't get it, the American people do.)
To: Spruce
"Would not this child already have a birth certificate naming the mother and father?"
I was wondering the same thing.
To: freekitty
In some cases where newborns are adopted, the adoptive parents' names are placed on the birth certificate. This started because in closed adoptions, the anonymity of the birth parents is protected.
11
posted on
04/06/2004 6:42:50 AM PDT
by
mongrel
To: Support Free Republic
One thing that most news media failed to mention about this particular adoption is that it was "open" - the birth mother selected the two Dads specifically to raise her child. The state of Oklahoma should stay out of it and honor the wishes of the mother. Regardless of any legislation that hyper-conseravtives may get passed, gays and lesbians and their families will still exist. It is time to move on to another topic.
12
posted on
04/13/2004 7:00:13 PM PDT
by
jimbo68
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson