Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IBM's 'dinosaur' turns 40
San Francisco Chronicle | April 5, 2004 | Benjamin Pimentel

Posted on 04/05/2004 5:35:14 PM PDT by NCjim

Edited on 04/05/2004 5:40:44 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-183 next last
To: NCjim
I installed one of the very early 3033's (I think it was serial number 13, could not close the doors on the outboard channels, so many of those yellow wires...customer bought it to run VM and multiple copies of MVT... Poughkeepsie wanted us to bludgeon them into running MVS.... What Turmoil...
141 posted on 04/05/2004 10:28:50 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
I know a hotel that keeps it's old IBM-36 mainframe alive (they had to replace the fans recently because they would stop the 40 minute boot process by shutting down) to read the data on the old 8" floppy disc packs they used to download "guest history".

Why anyone would still want a copy of their hotel bill from 1998 (when the machine was replaced with an AS-400) and before is beyond me.
142 posted on 04/05/2004 10:30:09 PM PDT by Fledermaus (Ðíé F£éðérmáú§ ^;;^ says, "Fallujah would make a lovely glass table top!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VMI70
PDP's are the first DEC machine, the first Mini-Computer...
143 posted on 04/05/2004 10:33:14 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: txflake
To be sure, "Freon" is a whole group of Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). Tri-chloro-tri-fluoro-ethane is Freon 113. IIRC the stuff used in auto air conditioners was the refrigerant Freon 12.

We just used q-tips and rubbing alcohol, and then blew on them!

144 posted on 04/05/2004 10:42:54 PM PDT by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Vermonter
Anyone else remember playng tunes on the 1403 printers?

Raindrops keep falling on my head

145 posted on 04/05/2004 10:51:37 PM PDT by Nick Danger (carpe ductum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: StopGlobalWhining
1965 is when I joined .... worked with the RS 6000 when it was introduced....an amazing machine.....still preferred 360/370/3090 with MVS ...VM ...
146 posted on 04/05/2004 11:02:27 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Whispering Smith
As I remember, forty years ago it was the 1401. Thirty five years ago was the 1410. Thirty years ago the 365 was going and the 370 was coming

My own remembrances were, in computer room chronology: 650, RCA 501, 1401, RCA Spectra 70, 1410, 360, 370. It was into minis and PCs after that. It's funny how some PC server rooms have grown up to look like the mainframe rooms of old, complete with raised floor, viewing windows, UPS, frigid air and all.
147 posted on 04/05/2004 11:30:30 PM PDT by pt17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NCjim; Bobibutu
The System/360 was introduced April 7, 1964.

A long time ago I worked for a brilliant guy who had been involved in the design of the 360. He told us that the pressure was so intense to get the 360 out that two people committed suicide.

148 posted on 04/05/2004 11:47:04 PM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Remember when memory was called "core"?

I remember when it *was* core...


149 posted on 04/06/2004 12:06:41 AM PDT by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Vermonter
How about tape drives running away. Can't remember the model

Someone developed a novelty program for one of the big "washing machine" disk drive units which would work the read/write heads in just the right rhythm to "walk" the unit around the floor from the vibration.

150 posted on 04/06/2004 12:10:48 AM PDT by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
I had to do a Y2K conversion on my own code! It took five years of background work (~a million lines of Cobol), but who knew a software project started in 1982 would see the turn of the century?

You're not the only one...

I was original designer and coder on an application that I started in 1982 as well, and it's still going strong. A new update will be released next week or so, with a new state-of-the-art user interface. A lot of the "engine" is still the original stuff, although it was auto-converted from original FORTRAN to "C" in the early 90's, and recompiled as C++ (with suitable cleanup) last year. And it was originally a mainframe application, but now of course runs on PCs under Windows.

151 posted on 04/06/2004 12:26:29 AM PDT by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: VMI70
Anyway, thanks for jogging the memory. Was "hand programming" the standard way to start up back then?

For a while, yeah. Some of our operators did it often enough that they had the whole sequence memorized and didn't need to read it off a cheat sheet.

What is the equivalent between what we did then (hand program, tape read) to what happens today when we turn on our computers?

Now it's all read out of system ROM (read-only memory) which has the boot sequence permanently stored in it, and the CPU chip is built so it knows to look in a particular memory location when it's first turned on an start executing whatever it finds there. So the on-CPU "wake-up" instructions are equivalent to your hand-coded instructions, and the contents of the ROM are equivalent to your old paper tape.

Computer trivia: Starting up a computer is called "booting" the computer because in the old days the sequence of hand-coding the start-up program was called "bootstrapping". It was called this because getting the operating system off the ground and flying was similar to the phrase about "lifting yourself up by your own bootstraps" (which was itself inspired by the humorous image of trying to leave the ground by pulling hard upwards on your own shoelaces or "boot straps").

The computers then (and in a similar but internal sequence now) had to "lift themselves up by their own bootstraps" by manually loading a handful of instructions into them by hand, which gave them just enough information to know to (and how to) read what was on the pre-programmed paper tape, which then gave the computer just enough smarts to know how to find the disk drive (or magnetic tape) from which it would load the device drivers which would then allow it to load the operating system which would then allow it to start doing something resembling actual work.

Even today computers go through the same sort of "bootstrapping" themselves up into full competence when first powered on, but it's a lot more invisible because it's all done automatically. And it's still called "booting". :-)

152 posted on 04/06/2004 12:41:57 AM PDT by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Vermonter
Anyone else remember playng tunes on the 1403 printers?

I remember how it would spew paper like a fountain if the carriage tape loop came unglued. But otherwise, it was an excellent machine, built like a tank.

The other day, I found an old "green card" from my days as an IBM 360/370 assembly language programmer. It was a fine computer, except that it didn't have a hardware stack.

153 posted on 04/06/2004 12:54:25 AM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon
Computer trivia: Starting up a computer is called "booting" the computer because in the old days the sequence of hand-coding the start-up program was called "bootstrapping".

We called it Initial Program Load (IPL) back then. Or, as a verb, "IPL-ing the machine".

154 posted on 04/06/2004 12:58:25 AM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: sailor4321
Yes,

Especially coupling counters (don't forget your carry-back wire) and multiple x and digit selection. Also the joy of summary punching.
155 posted on 04/06/2004 1:24:24 AM PDT by Bad Dog2 (Bad Dog - No Biscuit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
If that computer doesn't use electron tubes, it has no claim to being anything close to a dinosaur!

--Boot Hill

156 posted on 04/06/2004 1:37:54 AM PDT by Boot Hill (Candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo, candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txflake
I do believe it was: tricloroflouroetheylene. We had had a 370-165 and a 168 running in tandem through a specially built IBM blackbox also a 370-175 that had 3 1/2 inch water cooling pipes, 5 1403 Nancy 1s, and I can't remember how many tapes and discs, 70,000 reels in the library. Do remember, OS/MVS, JES2, HASP and TSO. This was in '74 - '75
About the only console command I can remember is F 00E,,B (Modify printer 00E to output class B), also was it Control, Reset, IMPL to reboot?
157 posted on 04/06/2004 1:40:56 AM PDT by Bad Dog2 (Bad Dog - No Biscuit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: sailor4321
Yes,

Especially coupling counters (don't forget your carry-back wire) and multiple x and digit selection. Also the joy of summary punching.
158 posted on 04/06/2004 1:45:50 AM PDT by Bad Dog2 (Bad Dog - No Biscuit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden
"If I came along 3 years later, my life would likely have been different."

How I relate to that! I was SO prepared to love computers but was so put off by the hassles, that I migrated elsewhere.
159 posted on 04/06/2004 2:59:22 AM PDT by Socratic (Yes, there is method in the madness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
I'd forgotten about that. Also, when the tape got worn and the hole punches tore it would do that
160 posted on 04/06/2004 5:27:17 AM PDT by Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-183 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson