To: pc93
Please indicate that Park Place is withholding medical information from Terri's parents contrary to an order from Michael in writing dated February 26, 2004 (in a last ditch effort to short-circuit a contempt of court motion) pursuant to Order Requiring Service of Copy of Annual Reports of Person On Parents of the Ward dated June, 18, 1996 "that he has no objections to the nursing home discussing Teresa Schiavo's medical condition with Robert of Mary Schindler." Park Place has been denying the Schindler's this information.
206 posted on
04/06/2004 2:30:32 PM PDT by
pc93
(Please visit http://bellsouthpwp.net/p/c/pc93/terri_schindler_life_ribbon_campaign.htm)
To: pc93; floriduh voter; cyn; sweetliberty; EternalVigilance; KDubRN; nicmarlo; Republic; msmagoo; ...
Thanks for the court transcripts!
We should all try to read every word so we can refute the mindbenders
of the world who say we just keep repeating hyperbole...
For starters, I wish the papers would stop tap dancing
around whether Michael has a FIANCEE or not.
Michael already testified under oath on January 24, 2000
that Jodi Centonze IS his fiancee
That makes him unfit as a guardian for Terri (even if there
was no financial incentive to murder her)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1107794/posts?page=493#493 7 Q Would you consider her your fiancee?
8 A I would consider her -- yes. Yes.
9 Q Has she ever been so noticed as anything
10 in writing in the newspaper as your fiancee?
11 A Yes.
12 Q You and she own a house together; is
13 that correct?
14 A Yes.
.....................Oh, and lets not forget he testified UNDER
OATH that he and Jodi OWN THE HOUSE TOGETHER. He can't hide
those assets under Jodi's name anymore. It on record. Court transcripts!
209 posted on
04/06/2004 5:49:19 PM PDT by
Future Useless Eater
(until Terri's org agrees that MindBender26 is one of 'us' please try to avoid him)
To: pc93
>> Park Place is withholding medical information from Terri's parents contrary to an order from Michael in writing dated February 26, 2004 (in a last ditch effort to short-circuit a contempt of court motion) pursuant to Order Requiring Service of Copy of Annual Reports of Person On Parents of the Ward dated June, 18, 1996 "that he has no objections to the nursing home discussing Teresa Schiavo's medical condition with Robert of Mary Schindler." Park Place has been denying the Schindler's this information.
WOW! So so let me rephrase to see if I understand...
Michael GAVE Park Place written permission to share Terri's
medical records with the Schindlers, to satisfy the court order.
But UNOFFICIALLY he must have forbidden any release of medical records?
So what reason does Park Place give for their REFUSAL to share those records?
Why isn't Park Place being sued?
210 posted on
04/06/2004 5:59:32 PM PDT by
Future Useless Eater
(until Terri's org agrees that MindBender26 is one of 'us' please try to avoid him)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson