To: endthematrix
I don't think they're any more a mercenary than is a Mexican security guard watching a K-Mart in Kansas.
A contract was let for a specific security service and this company was able to provide the specifications of the contract.
The Hessians in the Revolutionary War were mercenaries. A hired group of foreign fighters.
44 posted on
04/02/2004 11:04:28 PM PST by
xzins
(Retired Army and Proud of It!)
To: xzins
Thanks for the clarification. There are many white papers on the DoD contracting out services. To some, the issue is cost and efficiency benefits. The flip side is corruption and oversight and the illusion created of conventional military numbers and hiding support related deaths.
There is little doubt some Rats what to frame the debate into profiteering and campaign contributions. IMO, the red tape within the armed services has caused the farming out of support services that would be better served under the respecting commands. If you join the Army you maybe a cook or driver. The pay should be crap and you don't necessarily need to get the same training an infantryman. The cost should be cheaper than private corps, then against the US would be funding all the health care and other welfare. Also, on a national sovereignty rant, why should the US military be beholden to powerful (foreign)corporations that could influence national security issues?
45 posted on
04/02/2004 11:43:24 PM PST by
endthematrix
(To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
To: xzins
The Hessians in the Revolutionary War were mercenaries. A hired group of foreign fighters. You can have domestic mercenaries as well as foreign.
65 posted on
04/03/2004 5:29:15 AM PST by
A. Pole
(<SARCASM> The genocide of Albanians was stopped in its tracks before it began.</S>)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson