[Freesofar]

I await your mathematical disproof of evolution. Be sure to show your work, using additional pieces of paper if necessary. (Fair warning: I've read and analyzed all the usual creationist "mathematical disproofs" of evolution, and you're going to get shredded if you try to cut-and-paste one of them, because they're all deeply flawed and monumentally ignorant of the topic they're attempting to analyze).

#3 first Law of Physics

1st Law of debating: never answer a question that is designed to refract the point.
Mathematics cannot prove or disprove creation.
Only faith can do that.
I have never been to Japan but I have faith it is there.
I have never seen an electron but I have faith an electron will deliver this message to your brain.

[jennyp]

What is this "first Law of Physics"?

[Oztrich Boy]

1st Law of debating: never answer a question that is designed to refract the point.

Such as for example:
So lets just cut the bull and get right to the point.
Random chaos or God ?
I choose God.
you choose random chaos.
Debate over , you lose.

[Ichneumon]

#3 first Law of Physics

Again, what about it?

1st Law of debating: never answer a question that is designed to refract the point.

You might want to look up the definition of the word "refract" before you misuse it again.

But if I understand your mangled sentence, you appear to be saying that you intend to run away from any challenge to your position.

Mathematics cannot prove or disprove creation. Only faith can do that.

Faith can't do it either -- are you sure you understand the meaning of the word "prove"?

I have never been to Japan but I have faith it is there.

No, you have a great deal of evidence that it is there from multiple independent and verifiable sources, and thus concluding that Japan is there does not require "faith".

I have never seen an electron but I have faith an electron will deliver this message to your brain.

The photons feel left out.