Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jobless Recovery? Try Again. The big (payroll) jobs announcement has arrived at last.
NRO ^ | April 02, 2004, 3:10 p.m. | Larry Kudlow

Posted on 04/02/2004 1:11:26 PM PST by .cnI redruM

The blowout new-jobs number of 308,000 for March puts the lie to political charges by the Kerry Democrats that the U.S. is in a jobless recovery. This is the largest gain in monthly non-farm payrolls in four years.

More, for the first quarter of this year, 513,000 new jobs were created, with the Labor Department acknowledging significant upward revisions for the prior two months. At this pace, roughly 2 million new jobs could appear in 2004, a number that is certainly within shouting distance of the 2.6 million new jobs originally predicted by chief Bush economist Greg Mankiw. The administration walked away from this projection, but they should have kept their nerve.

Since 1970, the U.S. has created an astonishing 60 million new jobs. This calculates to 1.9 percent yearly increases in employment during a period of 3.2 percent annual gains in economic growth. If this employment trend continues, the level of non-farm payrolls will reach 132.1 million by the end of 2004 and 134.6 million by the end of 2005. Respectively, that equates to 2.1 million new jobs this year and 2.5 million in 2005. The non-partisan career staff at the Bureau of Labor Statistics has already forecasted 20 million new jobs by 2012.

Undoubtedly, Greg Mankiw calculated the numerous benefits of the 2003 Bush tax cuts when he first released his bold estimate. With tax rates slashed across-the-board on personal incomes, small businesses, investor dividends, and capital gains, both investors and workers now get to keep significantly more of what they save and earn. And when it pays more, after-tax, to work and invest, people do so. This is the incentive-reward effect that changes economic behavior. Since the tax cuts were implemented, the economy has grown at better than 5 percent annually, and the unemployment rate has dropped to 5.7 percent from 6.3 percent.

At the same time, broad stock indexes have gained roughly 35 percent, creating about $3.5 trillion of new wealth. The market value of all mutual funds has surpassed the prior peak reached in 2000. Along with rising home prices, family net worth has surpassed the record hit in early 2000.

This is beginning to look more like a traditional post-recession employment recovery. The March jump marks the seventh consecutive payroll jobs gain, for a total of 759,000 new hires, with 61 percent of U.S. industries reporting payroll increases — the highest percentage since July 2000.

Even the gap between the lagging business payroll survey and the stronger household survey of all people working is beginning to narrow. The household survey appears to be more sensitive to self-employed workers who have started their own Subchapter S or LLC (limited-liability corporation) businesses. Responding to lower income-tax rates, these entrepreneurs have registered 1.8 million new jobs since the end of 2002.

The day before Friday’s big jobs announcement, a widely-followed manufacturing index published by the Institute for Supply Managers registered its highest level since the end of 1983. Every industry group, including cars, electronics, and business equipment, cited increases in new orders and production.

Despite all this, economic pessimists keep talking about the outsourcing of jobs to foreign countries as a major obstacle to employment and economic recovery. They’re dead wrong. New data from U.S. international trade accounts show that there are more foreign companies investing in the U.S. to create new jobs here at home — a process known as insourcing — than there are American firms sending jobs overseas.

Analysts should take their blinders off and see how the combination of tax cuts and low interest rates, along with rapid productivity gains and a strong rebound in corporate profits, has once again put U.S. growth above growth in any other industrial country.

Sen. John Kerry, of course, wants to roll back the Bush tax cuts and penalize American corporations that sell to foreign customers abroad as well as U.S. consumers at home. While his tax-hike package effectively panders to left liberal interest groups inside the Democratic party — people who oppose free trade and wage class warfare on successful earners and investors — it would have a devastating effect on economic recovery and jobs growth.

In a recent poll sponsored by the Duke University business school, 64 percent of chief financial officers of U.S. corporations believe that Bush’s economic policies would raise gross domestic product more than Kerry’s. Duke finance professor John Graham, director of the survey, said “CFOs like free trade, they like low interest rates, and they like tax cuts . . . . They don’t like regulation and restrictions, but overall they think protectionism slows down economic growth.”

The CFOs must also love the latest jobs number. Who, outside of the Kerry Democrats, wouldn’t?


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bushrecovery; economy; joblessrecovery; jobreport; jobs; kudlow; recovery
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
What? I thought we were all DOOOOOOOOOMED!!!
1 posted on 04/02/2004 1:11:27 PM PST by .cnI redruM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All


Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!


2 posted on 04/02/2004 1:12:53 PM PST by Support Free Republic (If Woody had gone straight to the police, this would never have happened!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Employment figures released a day after Kerry's anti-Bush economy attach add. Which was released on the same day that his own economic adviser said outsourcing is no big deal. Too funny.
3 posted on 04/02/2004 1:15:56 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter
sorry "attack ad"
4 posted on 04/02/2004 1:16:25 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
"At this pace, roughly 2 million new jobs could appear in 2004, a number that is certainly within shouting distance of the 2.6 million new jobs originally predicted by chief Bush economist Greg Mankiw. The administration walked away from this projection, but they should have kept their nerve. "

This might also be an anomaly. Please keep the champagne on ice until 'the fat lady sings'. The admin might have been right to walk away from their projection - why did they make it in the first place - if this is only a blip. The sharp increase in Treasuries today will have a dampening effect if they hold, or even continue upward. A lot of people have re-financed using variable rates. Too many maybes, and too early to pop the corks.
Remember it's only the end of the first quarter & the score can change a lot before the end of the game.
5 posted on 04/02/2004 1:18:45 PM PST by familyofman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Pinging Willie Green...
6 posted on 04/02/2004 1:20:02 PM PST by Eala (Sacrificing tagline fame for... TRAD ANGLICAN RESOURCE PAGE: http://eala.freeservers.com/anglican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter
Yes, the best Poodle Boy Kerry could produce was a sorry attack ad. I agree.
7 posted on 04/02/2004 1:20:10 PM PST by .cnI redruM (Kerry 2004 - Currently crouched in Howard Dean's spider-hole of denial.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Eala
freep cnn.com's front page poll.
8 posted on 04/02/2004 1:20:25 PM PST by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
I was wondering today how the media was going to spin this. Sure enough, at the top-of-the-hour radio news today I heard this, "but critics say those jobs don't pay as well as before."

Look for this to be the spin on the talk shows tonight.
9 posted on 04/02/2004 1:21:18 PM PST by Skooz (My Biography: Psalm 40:1-3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
We could do even better by lowering the payroll tax.

When must companies be penalized for hiring people?
10 posted on 04/02/2004 1:25:40 PM PST by mc6809e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
We're DOOMED I tell you, we're DOOMED...hand wringing...hanoi john....
11 posted on 04/02/2004 1:26:35 PM PST by GailA (Kerry I'm for the death penalty for terrorist, but I'll declare a moratorium on the death penalty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyofman
A lot of people have re-financed using variable rates

Regarding the entirety of your post, yes, no need to get all giddy too soon.

As for those who re-fi'd at variable rates: I know some did, but why would you with fixed rates so damned low?

12 posted on 04/02/2004 1:38:53 PM PST by Mr. Bird (Ain't the beer cold!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,115802,00.html

Jobless Rates Vary in Battleground States

Tennessee is UP 13,300 new jobs!

13 posted on 04/02/2004 1:56:26 PM PST by GailA (Kerry I'm for the death penalty for terrorist, but I'll declare a moratorium on the death penalty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: familyofman
You're back, I see. Please, at least try to act like this may at least be a little good news. Every time I see your ID lately, I just picture you as Eeyore, walking around with a rainy cloud over his head, spouting pessimism everywhere.
14 posted on 04/02/2004 2:02:05 PM PST by cspackler (There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird
As for those who re-fi'd at variable rates: I know some did, but why would you with fixed rates so damned low?

There's a reason, but I don't want to offend anyone by saying it. Let's just say "burned-out 3 watt light bulb" and leave it at that.

15 posted on 04/02/2004 2:03:44 PM PST by cspackler (There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Skooz
"but critics say those jobs don't pay as well as before."

Just for the record, who is America's largest employer?

16 posted on 04/02/2004 2:06:48 PM PST by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Paging John Huang - please get your facts straight & correct your opinion piece!
17 posted on 04/02/2004 2:10:48 PM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
We're not concerned about Jobs anymore, now we're concerned about the Deficit.
18 posted on 04/02/2004 2:13:05 PM PST by RobFromGa (FR needs monthly contributors, its painless and quick...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skooz
ABC News = Unemployment figures higher
19 posted on 04/02/2004 2:19:14 PM PST by 38special
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Deeply Saddened Daschle Ping
20 posted on 04/02/2004 2:32:24 PM PST by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson