To: bvw
"I agree with China on this, except only in places where that claim of 200 miles would interfere with another nation's claim of 200 miles -- in such cases an equal split is the rule."
Why not 300 miles or 5000 miles? Why 200? Why not 50, or 40, or 30?
"Better this -- national sovereignity -- than some UN "Law of the Sea"."
Ok, so we will replace the "UN Law of the Sea" with bvw's Law of the Sea.
I don't want to be rude but you are clueless on this issue and what the PRC is doing in the South China sea to infringe on other nations territorial rights.
13 posted on
04/02/2004 3:14:39 AM PST by
Avenger
To: Avenger
Alright. make it 300 miles.
16 posted on
04/02/2004 3:30:37 AM PST by
bvw
To: Avenger; piasa
Your both exactly right (including the part where 'bvw' is clueless.)
FONOPS bump.
22 posted on
04/03/2004 2:03:32 PM PST by
Magnum44
(Terrorism is a disease, precise application of superior force is the ONLY cure)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson