Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bvw
"I agree with China on this, except only in places where that claim of 200 miles would interfere with another nation's claim of 200 miles -- in such cases an equal split is the rule."

Why not 300 miles or 5000 miles? Why 200? Why not 50, or 40, or 30?

"Better this -- national sovereignity -- than some UN "Law of the Sea"."

Ok, so we will replace the "UN Law of the Sea" with bvw's Law of the Sea.

I don't want to be rude but you are clueless on this issue and what the PRC is doing in the South China sea to infringe on other nations territorial rights.
13 posted on 04/02/2004 3:14:39 AM PST by Avenger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Avenger
Alright. make it 300 miles.
16 posted on 04/02/2004 3:30:37 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Avenger; piasa
Your both exactly right (including the part where 'bvw' is clueless.)

FONOPS bump.
22 posted on 04/03/2004 2:03:32 PM PST by Magnum44 (Terrorism is a disease, precise application of superior force is the ONLY cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson