Skip to comments.
Fighting back on outsourcing
TownHall.com ^
| Friday, March 2, 2004
| by Bruce Bartlett
Posted on 04/02/2004 12:19:09 AM PST by JohnHuang2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: All
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
To: JohnHuang2
Of course outsourcing could be made to "go away" - they do a great job at making US competition "go away" in the very countries who are engaged in outsourcing, in fact. It's called "making and enforcing laws".
And anyone who would virtually celebrate the severe erosion of the "tech sector" after this country has for decades hitched its wagon to technology is absolutely insane.
And the jobs mentioned here - the ones that "require physical contact with the customer"...well, I'll just leave it to your imagination exactly what those jobs entail. (Hmmmm..."high class male prostitute"...now that's the ticket!)
3
posted on
04/02/2004 1:04:26 AM PST
by
The Duke
To: The Duke; ninenot; A. Pole; Willie Green
3 - "The most important finding of the Global Insight study is that the cost savings from outsourcing don't just flow into higher corporate profits. They contribute significantly to higher output in the U.S., which leads to job increases elsewhere in the economy. The study estimates that the gross domestic product was $34 billion higher last year because of outsourcing and that this created over 90,000 net new jobs. "
Now, let me get this straight. If I hire 10 people outside the US to do some work, and I need 2 US people to support the work, I have created 2 new US jobs. Great. However, if I hired 8 US people to do the same work, I would have created 8 new US jobs. So, somehow, creating 2 new US jobs and 10 overseas jobs is better than creating 8 new US jobs.
Yes - that's it - the 'new' math.
4
posted on
04/02/2004 2:04:27 AM PST
by
XBob
To: The Duke; ninenot; A. Pole; Willie Green
And don't forget, that overseas output is credited as US output, even though it is not produced here.
Ah, isn't this 'new' math marvelous?
Ah, just like that #1 crockpot I bought just tonight, after searching 3 stores, for a US made crockpot, I finally settled for #1 Original American Crock pot, Rival, made in China, as there are apparently no crock pots made in the US anymore, or anywhere except China.
5
posted on
04/02/2004 2:14:08 AM PST
by
XBob
To: JohnHuang2
6
posted on
04/02/2004 2:27:31 AM PST
by
nika
To: XBob
7
posted on
04/02/2004 2:30:21 AM PST
by
harpu
To: JohnHuang2
The Dems aren't looking at IT jobs...they're looking at low end wages & manufacturing....eg China.
8
posted on
04/02/2004 2:33:04 AM PST
by
The Raven
To: XBob; The Duke; ninenot; A. Pole; Willie Green
Those of us old enough to remember the destruction of the blue collar middle class by "free traders" 25 years ago are unlikely to buy the same kool aid when it is peddled to white collar workers.
To: harpu
What a piece of crap article, your first reference :
"Michigan has keenly felt the loss of 300,000 jobs during the past three years.
[snip]
The United States and Michigan are "insourcing" far more jobs than theyre outsourcing.
10
posted on
04/02/2004 3:15:45 AM PST
by
XBob
To: harpu
And the second article on 'incsourcing' - another pile of crap.
If foreign manufacturers are creating jobs here to make stuff to sell to Americans, what that means is that our corporations are being out manuvered and out managed.
Insourcing should mean, foreign corps invest in jobs here to build stuff to sell in their countries, not in this country.
All BS - all it means is that 'insourcing' as it is used and defined is a fancy way to take the extra money the foreign corps have accumulated at our expense (our $500b trade deficit) to buy up our US corps.
11
posted on
04/02/2004 3:20:47 AM PST
by
XBob
To: Sam the Sham
9 - "Those of us old enough to remember the destruction of the blue collar middle class by "free traders" 25 years ago are unlikely to buy the same kool aid when it is peddled to white collar workers."
Well, the free-traitors are sure trying to BS us once again, as I noted in my last several posts.
12
posted on
04/02/2004 3:22:58 AM PST
by
XBob
To: The Duke
Of course, it is absurd that almost half of Americans should fear outsourcing. The vast majority of jobs can never be outsourced, because they require physical contact, close proximity to markets, and other factors.This guy is a serious moron or a deceiver. Outsourcing places great wage pressure on American jobs. Except for that of effin' gubbermint bureaucrats (our emerging nomenclatura) and lawyers. The jobs don't have to actually be moved out of America. Just the hanging threat (sword of Damocles) will do nicely in many instances
13
posted on
04/02/2004 3:29:34 AM PST
by
dennisw
(“We'll put a boot in your ass, it's the American way.” - Toby Keith)
To: Sam the Sham; nika; harpu
Sam - nika posted a much more pertinent article. Harpu, read nika's article - instead of the BS you linked.
Good to know what BS they are spreading though, Harpu.
14
posted on
04/02/2004 3:29:36 AM PST
by
XBob
To: XBob; harpu; freedom; The Duke
Yes, its' a great article.
But you left out innovation. You see, jobs don't matter because we Americans are magically better at INNOVATION. So we can ship our jobs offshore and just focus on INNOVATION. Of course, how we are going to INNOVATE when all our R&D is being done by Chinese and Indian engineers they never quite say. But hell, we sure can INNOVATE.
To: XBob
And don't forget, that overseas output is credited as US output, even though it is not produced here. ?
16
posted on
04/02/2004 3:58:55 AM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: 1rudeboy; XBob
X, could you clarify that? Do you mean that products of H-P manufactured in China are somehow called US 'production?'
17
posted on
04/02/2004 7:01:26 AM PST
by
ninenot
(Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
To: 1rudeboy; ninenot
1- "The most important finding of the Global Insight study is that the cost savings from outsourcing don't just flow into higher corporate profits. They contribute significantly to higher output in the U.S., "
18
posted on
04/02/2004 11:59:41 AM PST
by
XBob
To: JohnHuang2
Maybe they should address the problem itself if they want to stop losing jobs to people in other countries.
The cost of heathcare, regulation and high taxes are the causes. Government is the culprit. We elected 'em, we are the problem.
But many here want to fix too much government with a fresh dose of government. It's past goofy.
19
posted on
04/02/2004 12:06:45 PM PST
by
Protagoras
(When they asked me what I thought of freedom in America,,, I said I thought it would be a good idea.)
To: Sam the Sham
Welcome to FreeRepublic. Bring your agenda with you?
20
posted on
04/02/2004 12:08:14 PM PST
by
Protagoras
(When they asked me what I thought of freedom in America,,, I said I thought it would be a good idea.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson