Skip to comments.
Drudge:'I saw papers that show US knew al-Qa'ida would attack cities with airplanes'...
Drudge
| 4/1/04
Posted on 04/01/2004 6:31:33 PM PST by woofie
This source of this article at Druge is the UK Independent which cannot be posted here ( Copyright stuff?) ...A woman translator claims she "...saw papers that show US knew al-Qa'ida would attack cities with airplanes'...
The nuts are out in force ...dont fnow if it will play anywhere but the marginal sights ...CBS ,NBC, places like that
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: stuff
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
To: woofie
Is this an April's Fools event?
21
posted on
04/01/2004 6:46:57 PM PST
by
Ruth A.
To: zook
I saw mommy kissing Santa Claus.
I saw him getting to third base with her...it wasn't pretty. BC (Before Clinton) what I saw would have been an inside-the-park home run.
22
posted on
04/01/2004 6:48:07 PM PST
by
ErnBatavia
(Gay marriage is for suckers...)
To: woofie
I think the kangaroo court's trying to use this person to lay a perjury trap for Dr. Rice. From what I've seen, though, she's a tinfoil whackoid, and the attempt to use her just demonstrates how badly the kangaroo court has failed in its mission to dig up muck for the Rats to fling at George Bush.
Still, I'm sure the media pinheads like Chris Matthews are practically orgasmic over the thought of having her on their shows. They can pair her up with Dickie Clarke and really put it to the Republicans. It will probably have about as much effect on the President's numbers as Dickie alone did, but I guess it makes them feel good.
23
posted on
04/01/2004 6:48:18 PM PST
by
CFC__VRWC
(AIDS, abortion, euthanasia - don't liberals just kill ya?)
To: Ruth A.
nope but I somehow think "fools" are involved
24
posted on
04/01/2004 6:48:28 PM PST
by
woofie
( 99% of lawyers give the rest a bad name.)
To: woofie
Is this the same source that was reported right after 911?
25
posted on
04/01/2004 6:49:01 PM PST
by
dalebert
To: woofie
What I don't understand is why Drudge always plays up the worst (for conservatives) on his site?? Seems like he doesn't help the cause any by splashing the bad news around in such a huge way. Just my opinion.
26
posted on
04/01/2004 6:49:21 PM PST
by
Cedar
To: woofie
Sibel Edmunds must be clairvoyant since she knows so much about what was discussed before 9-11 when she was HIRED on SEPTEMBER 13, 2001!!!!
IOW this moron has no idea in what context the "papers" she saw were compiled and/or presented. Plus, she appears to have been an FBI Staff Worker, so she NO F-in IDEA WHATSOEVER what may or may not have been briefed to her own Director, much less anyone in State, NSA or the White House.
27
posted on
04/01/2004 6:50:14 PM PST
by
commish
(Freedom Tastes Sweetest to Those Who Have Fought to Preserve It)
To: woofie
28
posted on
04/01/2004 6:50:34 PM PST
by
kcvl
To: woofie
29
posted on
04/01/2004 6:52:00 PM PST
by
AJFavish
To: Cedar
I don't think Drudge necessarily thinks this is credible...his attitude is if its out there put it up
30
posted on
04/01/2004 6:53:08 PM PST
by
woofie
( 99% of lawyers give the rest a bad name.)
To: woofie
The article mentions that she hired on two days before 9-11. Some large part of her testimony is hearsay based on her talking to lots of other translators in the same cubicle farm.
To: woofie
This is not new news.
She didn't even work for the government prior to 9-11. She found some old untranslated tapes that could be interpreted by a good comspiracy theorist as predicting that airplanes could be used as terrorists weapons. That was common knowlege. So could ships, trucks, vans , cars etc...
32
posted on
04/01/2004 7:02:09 PM PST
by
bayourod
(We can depend on Scary Kerry's imaginary foreign leaders to protect us from terrorists.)
To: CFC__VRWC
I think all of us should vow NEVER to watch Chris Matthews again.
As far as this women is concerned, no one is going to believe this except those that WANT to believe it and who cares about them?
33
posted on
04/01/2004 7:02:33 PM PST
by
tirednvirginia
((But things are looking up!))
To: woofie
She gave the commission something they already had. ABC Radio said the report of this woman can't even be verified.
34
posted on
04/01/2004 7:03:52 PM PST
by
BigSkyFreeper
(Liberalism is Communism one drink at a time. - P.J. O'Rourke)
To: woofie
Oh so I guess this leak knew exactly what day, time, the flight, and who? The Liberals are politicizing 911. Bush needs to take off the gloves, and go all out on these P.O.S.
To: austinmark
36
posted on
04/01/2004 7:08:50 PM PST
by
El Conservador
("No blood for oil!"... Then don't drive, you moron!!!)
To: woofie
This is old news, they talked about it before. They admit they had intel on this but it didn't tell them a date or a location. Analysis of the intel said it was likely planned to take place against US interests overseas. Not in the US itself.
37
posted on
04/01/2004 7:10:24 PM PST
by
dila813
To: tirednvirginia
I stopped watching that fat P.O.S. years ago. He is worthless! No wonder why his ratings are in the tank!
To: AJFavish
Project Bojinka (sp)
39
posted on
04/01/2004 7:13:57 PM PST
by
RKM
This intelligence that this woman claims to have of planes being used as weapons came out of the Phillipines Intelligence Bureau back in 1995 during the Clinton administration. If anyone is at fault over THIS "leak", hell it aint even a leak, it was talked about in the days following 9/11, if anyone is responsible for gleaning over this piece of intelligence it's the Bill Clinton administration, when Richard Clarke was sleeping on the job.
40
posted on
04/01/2004 7:15:52 PM PST
by
BigSkyFreeper
(Liberalism is Communism one drink at a time. - P.J. O'Rourke)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson