Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: Canadians view on Future US-Canada Policy on defense, energy and trade
Ipsos-Reid Poll ^

Posted on 04/01/2004 8:40:58 AM PST by SB00

Here's the summary:

Statement 1:"Canada should actively support the Bush Administration's missle defense system even if it may require dedicating military spending to the program or allowing US missile launchers in Canada."

29% Agree/Strongly Agree 69% Disagree/Strongly Disagree 2% No opinion

Statement 2: "Canada’s limited military spending should be used to enhance our abilities in peacekeeping and conflict resolution rather than trying to maintain multi-purpose forces intended for heavy combat alongside US military forces."

77% Agree/Strongly Agree 21% Disagree/Strongly Disagree 2% No opinion

Statement 3: "Canada should establish an energy policy that provides reliable supplies of oil, gas and electricity at stable prices and on protection of the environment, even if this means placing restrictions on exports and foreign ownership of Canadian supplies."

90% Agree/Strongly Agree 8% Disagree/Strongly Disagree 2% no opinion

Statement 4: "Canada should maintain the ability to set its own independent environmental health and safety standards and regulations, even if this might reduce cross-border trade opportunities with the United States."

90% Agree/Strongly Agree 9% Disagree/Strongly Disagree 1% no opinion


TOPICS: Canada; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: canadians; trade; uscanadarelations

1 posted on 04/01/2004 8:40:59 AM PST by SB00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SB00; NorthOf45; albertabound
Interesting poll
2 posted on 04/01/2004 8:46:34 AM PST by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SB00
Some statements that Canadians should be asked to consider:

"Decisions made in Washington have a larger impact on ordinary Canadians than decisions made in Ottawa."

"Canada, as it now stands, will last another 50 years."

"Canada is capable, both economicly and militarily, to provide meaningful military contributions in partnership with (and not as a minor supporter of) the United States and Great Britain in the next WWII level conflict."
3 posted on 04/01/2004 9:10:42 AM PST by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
HANDS UP! Anyone care what the Canucks say? Anyone? Buehler? Anyone?
4 posted on 04/01/2004 9:21:42 AM PST by GungaLaGunga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SB00
Get out the whoopee cushion labeled "Canada", it's time to start jumping up and down on our neighbors up North.
5 posted on 04/01/2004 9:24:14 AM PST by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SB00
The Liberal Trudeaupian mindf*ck was effective at reducing Canadians to mere sheeple.

EOM.
6 posted on 04/01/2004 9:26:59 AM PST by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobjam
There is an election on the immediate horizon and Ipsos Reid is the liberal pollster of choice, as they are for the Democrats. A famous Canadian once said "polls are for dogs."

Freep this poll instead, it is probably much more accurate.-

http://www.cfra.com/headlines/index.asp
7 posted on 04/01/2004 9:44:41 AM PST by albertabound (It's good to beeee Alberta bound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: albertabound
Well I just voted and it was Harper 62% and Martin 38%. Hmmmm
8 posted on 04/01/2004 9:50:59 AM PST by NorthOf45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NorthOf45
Harper said today, "the liberal party promotes liberal values. These values do not include National Security,National Defence and fighting international terrorism". Canadians will be voting with thier heads, not thier hearts this time around.
9 posted on 04/01/2004 9:57:39 AM PST by albertabound (It's good to beeee Alberta bound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SB00
Statement 3: "Canada should establish an energy policy that provides reliable supplies of oil, gas and electricity at stable prices and on protection of the environment, even if this means placing restrictions on exports and foreign ownership of Canadian supplies." Been there, done that. Trudeau's National Energy Program nearly wiped out Alberta's economy.
10 posted on 04/02/2004 1:20:51 PM PST by Squawk 8888 (Earth first! We can mine the other planets later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson