But last week, the Kerry campaign seemed to leave open the possibility that he had attended the November session, after historian Gerald Nicosia said he had found an FBI document that he said indicated that Kerry was there. As a result of Nicosia's assertion, Kerry's campaign said in a statement that while Kerry did not remember being at the meeting, "If there are valid FBI surveillance reports from credible sources that place some of those disagreements in Kansas City, we accept that historical footnote in the account of his work to end the difficult and divisive war."I've seen idiots refer to President Bush as '*', implying the hotly contested Florida election results in 2000. I.E. Dubya's win is an historical footnote ('illegitimate') in history too ...
I would bet that Jean Keri is lying. How do you 'forget' being in a meeting in which the discussion is about assassination plans for U.S. Senators ?? Anyway, I'm glad to see the WSJ and now the Boston Globe printing about it.
Didn't he vote NO after he said he wasn't there?