Yes. I am not suggesting to you that this is what the article is about: I am telling you that.
If you want further proof, learn Russian, read Pravda on your own, and learn some of that country's history.
Your reaction is precisely the reason why Europeans call us naive: reading between the lines is not indeed our forte. In your case, you cannot even recognize when someone can. Many Americans, who travelled in the former Soviet Union and were later told that EVERY SINGLE person they were in contact with reported to the KGB, also called such allegations delusional.
More disturbign is the fact that you cannot even recognize principle when you are looking at it:
But he is hardly a Conservative icon, who deserves support at Free Republic.
You take sides; you do not even bother to think of what is right. You will aligh yourself with the lowest of the low if its against someone you do not like. Nor you will bother with the facts: I did not say anything is support of Soros --- in fact, I even called him names (scum), which is not my usual way of expression. No matter: for people like you, it's about taking sides; if you are not against Soros, you are not with us.
Yours is a mentality of a Mogadishu mob, not of a patriotic American. I shall not be writing to you on this subject again.
I don't hate Soros and I don't hate Pravda......I dispise (sic) both.
Makes plenty sense, don't it?
And none of us believe it. There are plenty of anti-semetic groups out here in the Pacific Northwest. No need to look at Russian history to find this kind of hate, just come visit here - especially our large islamic population.
Fine you hate Pravda. That is not the subject.