Are you denying that Soros was over there? Do you think he has any business meddling in Ukranian politics?
What has the origin of a newspaper got to do with whether Soros was over there? What have those whom you insultingly refer to as the "d_mn Joooos," got to do with anything in this article? (Do you claim Soros has some sort of theological mission--either for or against Biblical values? Your comment makes no sense, whatsoever, in relation to the subject of the thread.)
Your posts, here, really do make you sound a bit pathological.
It's understandable: you don't know that country, and theirs is not an easy culture to comprehend. That's how most of evil is perpetuated: for "normal," not corrupted people, it's hard to believe in its extent; they'd rather believe that the one speaking about it is "not well" or has a hidden agenda.
Are you denying that Soros was over there? Of course not. He has many reasons to be there --- and he was invited.
Do you think he has any business meddling in Ukranian politics? That depends on what constutues "meddling."
There are plenty of academic conferences in this country on American politics. There were special conferences on the role of the Supreme Court in the last election. These conferences are routinely populated by speakers from abroad. Some of them conclude that Supreme Court shouldn't have done what it did, etc. ---- are these people meddling in our affiars?
Of course not. Such discussions and conferences take place all the time. They are a part of an open society and considered abnormal only by people that want the society to close.
Fact: a conference was organized by the local committee, presumably consisting of Ukrainians. Fact: Soros was invited. Fact: Soros accepted an invitation and participated in a conference. That's all we know.
What has the origin of a newspaper got to do with whether Soros was over there?
You own position is a good answer. Behaviorists call this the "framing effect:" how one defines the problem oftern determines, by itself, the solutions that people will seek. The author wrote a hit peace, without even an attempt at providing facts. His agenda are not hidden at all: starting with the title, which to the Russian consumers reads: "The Jews that screwed up Russia in 1917 are doing that again." Protocols of the Elders of Zion in action.
It is you who should ask himself why you would so stoicly defend a paper that does not deviate from its bad reputation, publishes an anti-Semitic hit piece, provides in it not a single fact --- not even the name of the conference organizers --- and you defend it even after someone attracts your attention to these facts.
Is it possible that you simply share the same delusions? That's for you to know, however.