Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Group Finds Kerry Rhetoric on Rising Gas Prices 'Laughable'
CNSNEWS.com ^ | 3/30/04 | Melanie Hunter

Posted on 03/30/2004 11:21:46 PM PST by kattracks

(CNSNews.com) - Democrat John Kerry's attack on President Bush for the nation's dependence on foreign oil in the midst of rising gas prices raised the ire of a public policy group that says, "Kerry's rhetoric would be laughable if the consequences of its implementation weren't so serious."

"Senator Kerry needs a reality check," said NCPA Senior Fellow H. Sterling Burnett. "The strategic petroleum reserve is supposed to be set aside for use in case of war or other national emergency, not to stave off temporary gas hikes. I guess he forgot about the war on terror."

NCPA also admonished Kerry for claiming the U.S. could eliminate its dependence on foreign oil in 10 years by investing in new renewable technologies and increasing automobile CAFE' standards.

"Every credible study shows that proposed technologies and the necessary infrastructure to replace the internal combustion engine are decades away at best," said Burnett. "Increasing CAFE' standards simple makes it cheaper to drive, thus it will not reduce our reliance on OPEC. It would instead result in thousands of otherwise avoidable deaths and tens of thousands of needless injuries."

Burnett said Kerry has no room to talk about America's dependence on foreign oil, since the Democrat has repeatedly opposed efforts to increase domestic production.

"We will only become more dependent upon foreign supplies of oil in the future under the Kerry plan," Burnett said.



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; gasprices; kerry; ncpa

1 posted on 03/30/2004 11:21:47 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Oh so we are supposed to go to John (I will Raise the gas tax $.50 a gallon) Kerry to "save" us from High Gas prices?????
2 posted on 03/30/2004 11:25:56 PM PST by MNJohnnie (If you have to pretend to be something you are not, you have all ready lost the debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Maybe just maybe Kerry will push Michigan in to the Bush column. But then it was hard to believe that Michigan voted for a guy who viewed the internal combustion engine as one of the biggest evils in American history.
3 posted on 03/30/2004 11:30:05 PM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JLS
Actually, I am hoping we carry Minnesota into the Republican Column for the 1st time since 1972. I really want a 48 state landslide but if it must be close it would be really sweet if the radical Left's predictably safe haven, Minnesota, was to be the state to put Bush over the top. I would love to hear the squeals of outrage from Minnesota's two most despicable children (Al Franken and Garisson Kileor) if the citizens of Minnesota spit square in their eyes.
4 posted on 03/30/2004 11:40:48 PM PST by MNJohnnie (If you have to pretend to be something you are not, you have all ready lost the debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Hmm ... maybe it's time for me to move home..

Good luck!

5 posted on 03/31/2004 1:03:16 AM PST by slowhandluke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
John Kerry will raise the Gas Tax $0.50 a gallon and people will quit buying every SUV left on the car lots and people will be buying foreign econo boxes again, killing the American Auto Industry. Didn't that happen once before John Kerry? Or are you to stupid to realize that history will repeat itself one more time. Because when the above happened, inflation jumped through the roof and interest rates went to record highs. On top of that job loss was rampant and it felt like America was ready to come apart without a shot being fired. Those were some very depressing, deep recessionary times.

PLEASE DON'T VOTE FOR JOHN KERRY.
6 posted on 03/31/2004 1:26:47 AM PST by herkbird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The Hill: Renewable Energy Issue Could be Ill Wind for Kerry

6/17/2003 7:17:00 PM


To: National Desk, Media Reporter

Contact: Sam Dealey of The Hill, 202-361-8061

WASHINGTON, June 16 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) has urged the country to become less dependent on foreign energy sources - but some critics charge the Democratic presidential hopeful hasn't lived up to his own rhetoric in his own state, staff writer Sam Dealey reports in the June 18, 2003, issue of The Hill. A proposed wind farm seven miles off Nantucket Island isn't sitting well with some of Kerry's constituents, including retired CBS anchorman Walter Cronkite and members of the Kennedy family, who don't want whirling turbines blocking their view. But the project would produce electricity with no pollutant emissions, waste discharge or water consumption. A Kerry campaign spokeswoman said the candidate was "waiting to hear about the results from the environmental impact statement" and would announce his verdict on the project after receiving the information.

A foul Cape Wind blows for Kerry

By Sam Dealey

A renewed plea by presidential hopeful John Kerry (D-Mass.) to redouble efforts at using renewable energy has elicited criticism that the senator has failed to adequately push for such innovations in his own backyard.

Speaking in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, last Friday, Kerry called for a "new Manhattan Project" to decrease the nation's dependence on foreign energy sources and go easier on Mother Nature.

"We can generate more and more of our electricity from wind, the sun, forest and farm products," Kerry said. "I believe we can and should produce 20 percent of all our electricity from renewable sources by 2020. Twenty by 2020 -- now that's a clear vision for America."

It turns out, however, that it's not such a clear vision for all.

A huge proposed wind farm on Horseshoe Shoal, seven miles off Nantucket Island, has met with fierce resistance, including from some of Kerry's well-connected constituents and neighbors, who look askance at the idea of peering at a 130 whirling turbines from their luxurious vacation retreats.

Some residents in nearby Cape Cod and Martha's Vineyard, replete with well-heeled castaways and summer vacationers, say the wind farm would mar the view of the sound.

Kelly Demander, a spokeswoman for Kerry's presidential campaign, said the senator is "waiting to hear about the results from the environmental impact statement."

She said he will announce his decision when he sees the results. Demander declined to say whether Kerry would endorse the plan if the environmental impact studies turn out favorably for the massive project, known as Cape Wind.

Vocal opponents are not waiting for such results. They include retired CBS anchorman Walter Cronkite, who has a home in Martha's Vineyard, and members of the Kennedy family.

Energy Management Inc. (EMI), a renewable energy firm, sponsors the project. When up and running, the farm's turbines would produce 75 percent of the Cape and island's electricity with no pollutant emissions, waste discharge or water consumption.

Massachusetts lawmakers at both the federal and state levels have lent a sympathetic ear to their outraged constituents. A number of roadblocks have been thrown up to try to delay the project or ban it outright.

Several environmental impact studies have been commissioned, including one by the Army Corps of Engineers.

Kerry is in the spotlight on the issue because he is a major Democratic presidential candidate and a veteran advocate for renewable energy. The senator and his family summer on the Cape.

His equivocal stance on the project has drawn fire from some critics, including several longtime supporters.

"Kerry is the one who really needs to be called out on this stuff," said Kert Davies, research director of Greenpeace. "He's been pretty mum so far. We don't know where he stands."

Davies added, "He's obviously very pro-renewable energy; he knows the climate better than almost anyone in the Senate. And by that logic, he should be in favor of this project being implemented."

Supporters of the wind farm say the ongoing environmental impact study is a pretext for those who hope to kill the project.

"Typically, when people are trying to assemble the capital for a project they have a window, and if things don't get moving then the window just melts away," said Myron Ebell of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a free-market environmental think tank. "It's a typical strategy. Whenever you've got a project you don't want, you just delay it to death until the capital investment goes somewhere else."

Greenpeace's Davies agreed. "It's like any tactical fight," he said. "They're pushing every channel. It's the same stuff we use when we want to block something. You go from every angle, because you never know which one will stick."

"Ultimately," he added, "it's a Nimby argument." Nimby is an acronym for "Not in My Backyard."

James Gordon, president of EMI, is well aware of the ironies involved.

"There is a certain minority of folks on the Cape that have a problem with the visual impact, as modest as it is," he said. "It is difficult to come out and say you're a supporter of renewable energy until you may have a distant view of it."

Gordon declined to speculate on Kerry's stance on the project. "I'm convinced, frankly, that when public officials and legislators see the results of Cape Wind's environmental impact statement, they're going to support the project," he said.

In addition to Greenpeace, the Natural Resource Defense Council, the World Wildlife Fund, the Conservation Law Foundation and Friends of the Earth have spoken favorably of the project. Even some commercial competitors have voiced their support.

"Basically the only groups that have come out ardently opposed to it are some of the animal welfare groups that got told or misled early on that this is going to kill critters," said Davies of Greenpeace. "We've been watching them like a hawk. So far they're playing by the rules and more, going beyond what would be typical corporate behavior."

He added, "They're really trying to dot every 'i' and cross every 't'."

The Cape's population has tripled from 90,000 since the 1960s, when the last power source -- a heavy oil fuel fire plant -- was built.

"People think if you live in the right area you don't have to put up with anything," Ebell said. "Well, where are they going to get their energy? From little squirrels in wheels?"

"In the end, the true argument is people don't want to look at this thing from their million dollar homes," said Davies. "What's their impact on the planet when they've got a 15-room house they're air-conditioning all summer? Everybody has to ante up in the fight to solve global warming."


7 posted on 03/31/2004 1:34:56 AM PST by BookmanTheJanitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Part of the problem, right now, is that several oil refineries have been down for a couple of months for maintenance and preparing to produce the new environmental friendly diesel.
8 posted on 03/31/2004 1:35:01 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


9 posted on 03/31/2004 1:48:23 AM PST by Main Street (Stuck in traffic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Kerry's Gas Tax Increase Calculator

John Kerry has supported a 50 cent increase in the gas tax. Use our calculator to find out how much Kerry’s gas tax would cost you at the pump on a specific trip or each year.

CLICK HERE: Kerry's tax tax increase calculator

10 posted on 03/31/2004 1:49:33 AM PST by Las Vegas Dave ("Let's roll" Vote GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave
A 50 cent increase would cost me $5.14. . .

. . . every day!

75,000 miles @ 20 mpg. . . $1,875.00 a year.
11 posted on 03/31/2004 1:58:52 AM PST by Flyer ( http://talesfromtherail.com/ . . . .The disaster in Houston known as MetroRail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson