To: BCrago66
He lost that fight before it even started.
He was up against a kangaroo court.
The case he was working on has been covered up at the highest levels of government.
If the truth ever comes out.
A senator and future presidential candidate would be in prison along with a former president.
5 posted on
03/30/2004 6:39:25 PM PST by
sport
To: sport
Yes, there is no legal reason to allow sealing of the Kennedy assassination records and evidence, either. It is simply a political calculation. We will not let the peasants know this information.
Saying that *relatives* have a privacy interest in crime scene *pictures* is quite a stretch. The pictures contain *no* information about them.
6 posted on
03/30/2004 7:02:30 PM PST by
marktwain
To: sport
No you are wrong. The Supreme Court heard his case and gave Favish a hearing. Now it is done--he lost. The ruling underscores that the OIC was doing thier job properly when they refused to release the photos. The OIC had an obligation to protect the privacy of the Foster family. That is what they were doing by not releasing the photos...that is not the same as a coverup. I would think that had they released the photos, given what the Court has now ruled,they would have been in violation of the law.
It IS over with because nobody but people WAY out on the fringe take that whole conspiracy seriously.
To: sport
"He was up against a kangaroo court."
Renquist, Thomas, Scalia......kangaroo court? Uh no.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson