Skip to comments.
Hillary Predicts October Surprise
Newmax ^
| 3/30/04
Posted on 03/30/2004 9:38:00 AM PST by areafiftyone
New York Sen. Hillary Clinton is predicting that this year's presidential election will be very tight and the victor will win because of "something unforeseen."
"It will be very close," the former first lady tells the New York Post's Cindy Adams.
On how the contest will ultimately be decided, Clinton said, "It will be outside forces - something unforeseen that suddenly happens - that tilts the election one way or the other."
In 1992, Clinton's husband won the White House after Reagan Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger was indicted on Iran-Contra charges four days before the vote. Though the indictment was later overturned, the charges were enough to reverse President Bush 41's last-minute surge in the polls to within one point of Clinton.
In 2000 - again four days before the vote - a Democrat operative in Maine uncovered court records from Bush 43's then-24-year-old DUI stop. Bush's 5-point lead in Florida dwindled to a mere 537 votes, with the DUI news making Gore the popular vote winner nationwide.
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; divorcingbubba; hillary; hillaryspregnant; kerry; octobersurprise; prediction; stophillary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-158 last
To: areafiftyone
Looks like Hillary is challenging Sylvia Browne for her spot on Montel and Larry King.
141
posted on
03/30/2004 2:58:29 PM PST
by
Toespi
(,)
To: Fraulein
Good one!
To: areafiftyone
".....In 1992, Clinton's husband won the White House after Reagan Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger was indicted on Iran-Contra charges four days before the vote......"
That is bs pure and totally.
clinton won because te democrats bought a traitor by the name of ross periot and he persuaded enough gullible individuals that would have normally voted for then President Bush to vote for him. clinton kept the freeloaders, vommunists, socialists, and fools.
The results of that disaster is what we are still trying to recover from this date.
bill clinton: Another reason why idiots should not be allowed to vote.
143
posted on
03/30/2004 3:07:35 PM PST
by
sport
To: areafiftyone
Options...
1. Kerry vanishes in "plane accident"
2. Kerry takes a ride with Uncle Teddy down near chappaquitak (sp)
3. She's praying that Al Quaida attacks around that time and the American public concedes just like the Spainish did.
144
posted on
03/30/2004 3:08:25 PM PST
by
Blue Scourge
(Off I go into the Wild Blue Yonder...)
To: areafiftyone
Hillary is digging through the copies of the FBI files trying to find something on somebody. Her staff of Lilliputians are hard at work, and all of Washington knows it. She'll take her shot in October, that's true, but she has to test her intel before that. Look for little things to be planted long before October. My prediction is that it won't be at GW (she doesn't have the intel, if so she would have used some by now) it will be against Condi, Cheney, or another high ranking administration official. Of course, she may be bluffing, but I doubt it.
145
posted on
03/30/2004 3:15:43 PM PST
by
timydnuc
("Give me Liberty, or give me death"!)
To: areafiftyone
Don't get my hopes up again! With the headline I thought she might be leaving the country.
146
posted on
03/30/2004 3:18:09 PM PST
by
Macklew
To: Starve The Beast
In a strange sense I bet she's right. See what Terrorists did in Spain just before the election? Its a good guess they will try to do the same here. A big attack will tell the American's Bush can't protect you--we are still able to hurt you big time after all you have done. It will undermine the whole war on Terror Thing. Kerry will seem like a man who can end the war by pulling the troops out of the Middle East (what Osama wanted if you recall) and coming home to re-fight Johnston's war on poverty. Don't knock the Hil--she may be on to something.
147
posted on
03/30/2004 3:19:16 PM PST
by
Hollywoodghost
(Let he who would be free strike the first blow)
To: Carolinamom
"The biggest October surprise for me would be Hillary's FINALLY adopting that child she hinted about years ago".I wholly agree. A "she can say anything mythological in reference to a block of voters at anytime and nothings changed in 3 years either" BUMP!!!
148
posted on
03/30/2004 3:33:49 PM PST
by
Pagey
(Hillary Rotten is (still ) a Smug and Holier- than- Thou Socialist)
To: mewzilla
Kerry just sent out for Depends. I want to read the entire thread later but your comment says it all. Funny and Brilliant.
To: Joy Angela
Per post #128: ROTFLMAO!
Comment #151 Removed by Moderator
To: areafiftyone
Two words....FBI FILES.
152
posted on
05/11/2004 8:45:26 AM PDT
by
Ann Archy
(Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience. DC)
To: areafiftyone
On how the contest will ultimately be decided, Clinton said,
"It will be outside forces - something unforeseen that suddenly happens - that tilts the election one way or the other."DOES ANYONE ELSE REMEMBER THIS ARTICLE? Surely Hillary knew in March 2004 when she uttered this statement that Sandy Berger was under investigation!
153
posted on
07/20/2004 3:57:27 PM PDT
by
Pagey
((Hillary Rotten is a Smug and Holier- than- Thou- Socialist))
To: Pagey
154
posted on
07/20/2004 3:57:46 PM PDT
by
Pagey
((Hillary Rotten is a Smug and Holier- than- Thou- Socialist))
To: MizSterious
155
posted on
09/10/2004 7:34:01 AM PDT
by
MamaLucci
("The "F" stands for "Forgery"......(among other things).)
To: areafiftyone
Considering her links to terrorists (released Palestinians, anyone? IRA leaders??? helllooooooo!!!!) I would think the FBI would be hauling her lard-ass in and questioning her after a statement like that. What did she know and when did she know it?
If that woman DOES attain the White House...there WILL be a rebellion.
156
posted on
09/10/2004 7:41:49 AM PDT
by
Alkhin
(just another one of my fly-bys...he thinks I need keeping in order.)
To: MamaLucci
To: timydnuc; neverdem; princess leah; areafiftyone; glock rocks; EggsAckley
My prediction is that it won't be at GW (she doesn't have the intel, if so she would have used some by now) it will be against
Condi, Cheney, or another high ranking administration official. Of course, she may be bluffing, but I doubt it.
I think whe was referring to the Wilson case.
158
posted on
10/31/2005 1:49:26 PM PST
by
txhurl
(Just trying to solve an old cold case here.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-158 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson