Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clarke's book will quickly be forgotten
Townhall.com ^ | 3/30/2004 | George Will

Posted on 03/29/2004 9:53:20 PM PST by Utah Girl

`So,'' Lincoln supposedly said to the White House visitor, ``you're the little woman who wrote the book that made this great war.'' Harriet Beecher Stowe's ``Uncle Tom's Cabin,'' published in 1852, quickly sold 300,000 copies -- equivalent to 3 million today -- and remains the only book to become an American history-shaping political event.

When the dust settles from the eight days that shook the world of Washington -- spanning Richard Clarke's appearance two Sundays ago on ``60 Minutes'' to his appearance last Sunday on ``Meet the Press'' -- no one will say of his ``Against All Enemies'' what Longfellow said of Stowe's novel: ``Never was there such a literary coup de main as this.'' Too much of the controversy about Clarke's book -- and testimony and interviews -- concerns adjectives.

Combating terrorism was only ``important'' to the Bush administration (by the eighth day Clarke was calling the Bush administration ``lackadaisical'' about terrorism), whereas for the Clinton administration it was ``urgent'' -- ``no higher a priority.'' Except when it wasn't. When Clarke recommended ``a series of rolling attacks'' against al Qaeda's ``infrastructure in Afghanistan,'' his recommendation was rejected. But Clarke says ``to be fair'' we should understand that the Clinton administration decided it had higher priorities -- the Balkans, the Middle East peace process.

By the eighth day Clarke was telling Tim Russert that the difference is that Clinton did ``something'' whereas Bush did ``nothing.'' Nothing except, among other things, authorizing a quadrupling of spending for covert action against al Qaeda.

Clarke's apology to the American people, delivered to the Sept. 11 commission, should be considered in the context of the book, the publication of which was timed to coincide with his testimony. When, presuming to speak for the entire government, he said ``we tried hard,'' he actually must have been using the royal plural, because the gravamen of his book is that only he was trying hard. Indeed, parts of Clarke's memoir call to mind Finley Peter Dunne's jest that Teddy Roosevelt's memoir of the Cuban expedition should have been titled ``Alone in Cuba.''

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: againstallenemies; georgewill; richardclarke
Hmmmm.
1 posted on 03/29/2004 9:53:20 PM PST by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Who's Clarke and what "Book?"



I'm being a smartarse
2 posted on 03/29/2004 9:55:12 PM PST by RandallFlagg (<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com" target="_blank">miserable failure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
When he apologizes for his and the government's ``failure'' (he means its failure to listen to him, and his failure to make it listen), the implied principle is freighted with future acrimony. The principle is that when government efforts to protect public safety are proved to be imperfect, we should be able to identify measures that could have and -- this is not the same thing -- should have been taken.

A very important and critical point made by Will.

Clarkes "apology" was a dangerous precedent. When an enemy connives to attack our people and our land the government owes nothing to the American people except a righteous wrath towards those that committed the act; and a steely determination to destroy those them.

Could one imagine FDR apologizing for Pearl or Churchill apologizing for the Blitz?

Clarkes "apology" was the act of a political hack.

3 posted on 03/29/2004 9:58:06 PM PST by zarf (..where lieth those little things with the sort of raffia work base that has an attachment?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zarf
Excellent points.
4 posted on 03/29/2004 10:00:11 PM PST by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lepton
Bookmark bump
5 posted on 03/29/2004 10:00:12 PM PST by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
INTREP - CLARKE
6 posted on 03/29/2004 10:17:35 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Harriet Beecher Stowe's ``Uncle Tom's Cabin,'' published in 1852, quickly sold 300,000 copies -- equivalent to 3 million today -- and remains the only book to become an American history-shaping political event.

Certainly "Uncle Tom's Cabin" shaped American history, but other books have, too. What about "The Jungle" cleaning up the meatpacking industry, "Silent Spring" leading to the banning of DDT, and "The Feminine Mystique" starting the modern feminist movement?

7 posted on 03/30/2004 2:15:30 AM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
"meretriciousness" = Pretentious. Had to look that one up. Was george will trying to make a point by using a word that is itself meretricious in its use?
8 posted on 03/30/2004 2:39:57 AM PST by KillTime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson