Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems must marginalize Nader to avoid 2000 rerun
The Chicago Sun-Times ^ | 3-29-04 | BY LAURA WASHINGTON

Posted on 03/29/2004 6:40:38 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

In 1996, the Democratic Party dispatched a posse of activists dressed up like 7-foot-tall cigarettes to dog Republican presidential nominee Bob Dole on the campaign trail, mercilessly harassing him for cozying up to the tobacco lobby.

The ubiquitous Butt Men were magnets for the TV cameras and annoyed Dole to no end. The Viagra Man went on to lose the race, and Bill Clinton was re-elected.

I'm not suggesting that the Butt Men single-handedly defeated Dole, but they were an effective and prickly reminder of Dole's deficits.

Democrats aspiring to recoup the White House in 2004 have to tackle two targets this time: Republican President George W. Bush and independent contender Ralph Nader. And given the recent plummeting fortunes of ''W'' right now, Nader may be the more worrisome. Although Nader has no chance to win, Democratic activists are in a cold sweat over the prospect that Nader's bid could ensure Bush's re-election. Many believe that in 2000, Nader's Green Party candidacy siphoned off crucial support for Democratic presidential nominee Al Gore and assured a Bush victory.

In January, a group of progressive activists, including former Nader allies, launched a ''Ralph Don't Run'' Web site to persuade Nader to shun a reprise. A month later, Nader announced on NBC's ''Meet The Press'' that he would run as an independent. Nader, 70, says he is running for independent-minded voters tired of the political status quo. Washington has become ''corporate occupied territory,'' Nader argues, and there is little difference between Democrats and Republicans.

Nader is a dangerous man. The anti-Nader site says that ''a swing of just three electoral votes anywhere in the country and George Bush would never have become president.''

Just enough of Nader's 2.8 million votes would have gone to Gore.

Instead, we spent the fall of 2000 wringing our collective hands over a bunch of paper slivers dangling from Florida's now-infamous butterfly ballots. If not for those hanging chads, many people believe, Gore would be president today.

I wasn't in love with Gore. But under a Democratic president, we wouldn't be saddled today with the likes of the Patriot Act, No Child Left Behind, and Halliburton. In 2004, the stakes are even higher, and the contest will be just as close. Sen. John Kerry, the presumed Democratic nominee, will need every vote.

Nader can talk all he wants about democracy. From where I sit, it's about vanity. Nader has anointed himself democracy's savior, and I'm not buying it. Nader No More in 2004.

Here's an idea: Let's bring back Butt Man, only this time he'll be dressed like a hanging chad. I can see it now: Ubiquitous Chad Men hounding Ralph Nader every day, every minute on the stump from now until Nov. 2. It's a beautiful thing.

The Democratic National Committee has the connections to find a talented Hollywood costume designer to create just the right get-up.

The Chad Men can excoriate Nader at every turn. Nader is pledging to get on the ballot in all 50 states. Chad Men will be waiting in every one of them to greet Nader when he shows up to file his petitions.

When Nader bulldozes his way into the fall debates, Chad Man will be right at his side. Chad Men galore, outside those college assembly halls, flapping in the wind, when Nader arrives to court the youth vote.

Chad Man will be an omnipresent reminder of the risk of the Nader candidacy. This democracy cannot tolerate another election in which African Americans and senior citizens are robbed of their right to vote, or an election that hinges on a pile of paper shreds, or is decided by a dubious Supreme Court decision.

Yes, it's mean and maybe unfair. Still, the 2000 election debacle was mean and unfair, too, and Nader had a hand in it. Yes, maybe marginalizing Nader goes against the grain of America's democratic traditions of inclusion and independence.

As a progressive, I am generally sympathetic to those arguments. But not right now.

Chad Man will need all the friends he can get on the campaign trail. How about people dressed in doughnut costumes (the holes signifying ''0,'' as in the number of votes Nader should get in November)? How about your ideas? Bring them on.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: 2004; chads; election2000; election2004; gore; kerry; nader

1 posted on 03/29/2004 6:40:39 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
If they're 'progressive', am I 'regressive'?
2 posted on 03/29/2004 6:42:20 AM PST by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Gee, a political genius. I hope the DNC follows her suggestion.
3 posted on 03/29/2004 6:43:46 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Let's bring back Butt Man

I *think* I'm missing something... but maybe not.

At the risk of revealing the true depths of my ignorance... Who is/was Butt Man?

4 posted on 03/29/2004 6:47:45 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I think we all should put Nader bumper stickers on our cars. :)
5 posted on 03/29/2004 6:48:39 AM PST by Snowy (Microsoft: "You've got questions? We've got dancing paperclips.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Dang...guess it's time to send Nader $20. :^)
6 posted on 03/29/2004 6:49:49 AM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

He followed Gore around to remind folks that Gore took tobacco money.

7 posted on 03/29/2004 6:50:01 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
Never mind - I missed the first part of the article...
8 posted on 03/29/2004 6:50:05 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Well, the article said Dole. If Butt Man didn't go after Gore, he should've.
9 posted on 03/29/2004 6:50:59 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
"we wouldn't be saddled today with the likes of ... and Halliburton"

I stopped reading here, as noone who mentions Halliburton as something we're 'saddled' with could possibly offer intelligent political commentary.

If you're dumb enough to fall for the party line hook, line, and sinker, you're too dumb for me to listen to.
10 posted on 03/29/2004 6:53:48 AM PST by HarryCaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne; All
Check this earlier thread: Does Smoking have Any Health Benefits?

J

11 posted on 03/29/2004 7:02:42 AM PST by Fiddlstix (This Space Available for Rent or Lease by the Day, Week, or Month. Reasonable Rates. Inquire within.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I saw a clip of Nadar this morning talking about meeting up with Kerry to apparently drop out, saying they both have in common their dislike and want to defeat "that big corporation in the White House masquerading as a human being". These people are full of hate and continue to show how unstable they are.
12 posted on 03/29/2004 8:23:49 AM PST by bushfamfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
We need a troupe of North Vietnamese flag carriers to cheer Kerry at every campaign stop.
13 posted on 03/29/2004 9:26:28 AM PST by thoughtomator (Voting Bush because there is no reasonable alternative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Do liberals have nightmares of the Haliburton building eating their children or something? Their hysteria is getting very boring.
14 posted on 03/29/2004 4:03:51 PM PST by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson