[jmc813]

Dane, since abortion seems to be one of your big issues, I'd be interested in your opinion on this. In 1997 here in Jersey, we had a three way gubernatorial race. The candidates were the pro-abortion scumbag Democrat Jim McGreevy, the pro-abortion RINO Christie Witless, and the staunchly pro-life Libertarian candidate Murray Sabrin. I voted for Sabrin. Would you have?

[jmc813]

I'd be interested in your opinion on the situation I described in the previous post.

[Dane]

In 1997 here in Jersey, we had a three way gubernatorial race. The candidates were the pro-abortion scumbag Democrat Jim McGreevy, the pro-abortion RINO Christie Witless, and the staunchly pro-life Libertarian candidate Murray Sabrin. I voted for Sabrin. Would you have?

Well first of all I say thank God that I don't live in Jersey, the home of Corzine, Torricelli, Lautenberg, Bradley, Mcgreevey, and even Christine Whitman.

New Jersey is a pro-abortion state, what else can I say, so then it becomes a strategic vote. Whitman did cut taxes and was the incumbant, McGreevey I think in 97 got within 25,000 votes for her. McGreevey would be worse than Whitman IMO, so I would have held my nose and voted for Whitman.

New Jersey is paying dearly with McGeevey and I would have voted enthusiatically for Schundler in 01.

[A CA Guy]

First off JMC813, the Governor has nothing to do with abortion law and couldn't do a damn thing about it if they wanted to.
They are powerless, so putting a crazy libertarian person who happens to be pro-life will do nothing for that state.

I don't love a pro-abort Republican in general, but they can't practice that politics in their job as governor, so their is no consequence of their position that falls upon the people of his state.

It is a non issue in that case.

You made a pointless point, congratulations... LOL

Don't worry, I've had my own as we all have here at FR at one time or another.

Did you read my abortion views here or on another thread by the way?