[Ol' Dan Tucker]

Guess what, we passed a bond rather than a state bankrupts and we will have to pay it. We added another balanced budget amendment to the mix to offset attempted future spending.

Guess again. Those spending increases put into place by Davis and the democrats are permanent.

Did Ahnold suggest any cuts to the spending increases put into the budget? Nope. He only suggested that the bond be passed so that Davis' spending increases could be paid for legally, but the budget is still $19B larger and will be staying that way. The only republican suggesting spending cuts was McClintock. I saw how poorly he was treated by your fellow republicans for his efforts. Kind of funny how the so-called 11th commandment wasn't observed in his case, isn't it?

Bustamante wanted to raise taxes to pay for Davis' debt, just like the Oregon republicans.

So, if you support the republicans in Oregon who voted to raise their taxes, then you're no different than a Bustamante supporter.

[jmc813]

The only republican suggesting spending cuts was McClintock. I saw how poorly he was treated by your fellow republicans for his efforts.

Am I the only one who finds it hilarious that two (R)nold supporters are lecturing people on conservatism?

[A CA Guy]

True, the 40% increases were from a 40% growth by Davis of the California government.

There is a budget limit in place and next year things get cut or all take a cut, but we don't continue like we did under Davis.