To: GraniteStateConservative
Notice....there has been no leaks from this interview..... only silence.
2 posted on
03/28/2004 3:01:01 PM PST by
Dog
To: Dog
Please keep the left coasters apprised...
4 posted on
03/28/2004 3:04:30 PM PST by
bannie
(The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
To: Dog
Rats. I will miss this.
18 posted on
03/28/2004 3:23:36 PM PST by
lysie
To: Dog
There have been no leaks, because they got NOTHING. If they had something good against Rice, it would have been all over the place last night and today. The people at 60 minutes don't want you to see this interview, they would rather you not even know about it.
24 posted on
03/28/2004 3:31:08 PM PST by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: Dog; GraniteStateConservative; Grampa Dave; ALOHA RONNIE; Alamo-Girl; Poundstone
A subtle fact has emerged from Condi's comments and testimony we've heard from the 911 commission: President Bush had decided to eliminate al Qaeda after taking office. Did that trigger al Qaeda's sense of urgency when it hit the WTC, the Pentagon, and tried to hit the Whitehouse? If there were a policy change, and al Qaeda was responding to it, how did it learn of the policy change? Could there have been a mole who decided to use this information for the political advantage of the Democratic party? I have no special knowledge; I'm just asking curious questions.
511 posted on
03/28/2004 10:55:41 PM PST by
risk
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson