Skip to comments.
Monsoor Ijaz to testify before 9/11 commission
Fox News Channel ^
| 3/28/04
| me
Posted on 03/28/2004 1:36:20 PM PST by alnick
Please forgive the vanity, but I've done a search and cannot find any reference to this.
I saw Monsoor Ijaz on FNC an hour or so ago, and he said that he has been asked to testify before the 9/11 commission. He appeared to be anxious to do so.
If this has been posted elsewhere, I'll ask the mod to take this down.
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 911; 911commission; clarke; ijaz; ijaztestimony; monsoor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 261-277 next last
To: ovrtaxt
On page 127 of Clarke's new book "Against All Enemies", Clarke notes that it's possible that al Qaida operatives in the Phillipes "taught Terry Nichols how to blow up the Oklahoma Federal Building." Intelligence places Nichols there on the same days as Ramzi Yousef, and "we do know that Nichols's bombs did not work before his Philippines stay and were deadly when he returned."
And yet, the Clinton administration focused exclusively on homegrown terrorists, and never talked publicly about this matter. Laurie Mylroie, terrorism expert who worked for the Clinton administration, and others, have since talked about the Iraqi connection to the OKC bombing frequently.
81
posted on
03/28/2004 2:24:04 PM PST
by
Peach
To: alnick
Does anyone know when he will testify? I hope it's televised.
To: big ern
Newsmax has it. Search their site. The audio's pretty bad, BJC was speaking at a dinner or something, this was after 911. He said offhandedly that they couldn't find a legal reason to hold him when Mansoor Ijaz brokered the deal with the Sudanese. OBL on a silver platter. This was 1998, IIRC.
83
posted on
03/28/2004 2:28:22 PM PST
by
ovrtaxt
(Proud member of the Offensive Banned Tagline club.)
To: mystery-ak
Did he say he was or he hoped to testify, that's a big difference?He said that he had been asked to testify. They (Jarrett and Ijazz) discussed that for a few moments, and in closing, Jarrett asked if he would testify, and Ijaz said, emphatically, "I hope so."
84
posted on
03/28/2004 2:28:24 PM PST
by
alnick
To: oceanview
It seems as if they hear what they want to hear. I can't believe the applause that the spectators broke into after some of Clarks interview. It really appeared to be sophmoric to me. Much like the wellstone memorial. It all kind of fits the same mold....to me anyway
85
posted on
03/28/2004 2:29:36 PM PST
by
ThreePuttinDude
(Sept. 11th committee, might have opened pandoras treasure chest....)
To: Political Junkie Too
It strikes me that this commission is becoming exactly what the Democrats schemed to do in the leakd Senate Intelligence Committee memo. They "pulled the trigger" during the election season and forced the administration into hearings. Now the Democrats are trying to use the commission to bash Bush some more.Exactly!
86
posted on
03/28/2004 2:29:51 PM PST
by
alnick
To: ThreePuttinDude
was Tom Kean one of the people applauding?
To: YoSoy2
Did you see this, YoSoy?
>>Conferring with Clarke
Prior to his testimony Wednesday before the independent 9/11 commission, Richard Clarke conferred privately with one of its Democratic members, according to commission sources.
These sources say Clarke huddled with Tim Roemer, a former Democratic congressman from Indiana. Roemer's subsequent questioning of Clarke contained a few barbs but consisted largely of open-ended questions giving the witness a chance to criticize President Bush. Roemer confirmed he had met ''a couple of times'' with Clarke, as he said he had with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and CIA Director George Tenet. ''Nobody coaches Dick Clarke,'' Roemer added.
One reason why House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert unsuccessfully tried to curtail the commission's activities on schedule was the presence of Roemer, his former congressional colleague. Hastert regards Roemer as a partisan who attempts to project a bipartisan image.
<<
To: alnick
but what is most shocking about it is how the white house is totally unprepared, even though everyone with a clue knew in advance what this would be like.
To: cyncooper
ait. You said he said he's been asked to testify. Now you're saying he is "hoping" to testify?Yes, the segment began with Jarrett and Ijazz referring to the fact that he had been "asked to testify" and ended with Jarrett asking, "will you testify," and Ijazz responding, "I hope so."
90
posted on
03/28/2004 2:32:14 PM PST
by
alnick
To: alnick
Great. Thanks alnick.
91
posted on
03/28/2004 2:33:50 PM PST
by
cyncooper
("The 'War on Terror ' is not a figure of speech")
To: alnick
Good, thank you....
92
posted on
03/28/2004 2:33:51 PM PST
by
mystery-ak
(Terrorist: smoke em, if you got em.)
To: alnick
I saw it he said, "I hope so"
To: alnick
So will the Dems on the panel note his Debka-like winning streak on predicting world events?
94
posted on
03/28/2004 2:37:49 PM PST
by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
95
posted on
03/28/2004 2:38:10 PM PST
by
ThreePuttinDude
(Sept. 11th committee, might have opened pandoras treasure chest....)
To: hoosiermama
I would be shocked if the Commission allows Monsoor to testify publicly. Privately, maybe but publicly, I doubt it. Stranger things have happened. I think it will depend on how fast it sinks in that Clarke is damaged goods, which will cause the Commission's final report to not be taken seriously.
96
posted on
03/28/2004 2:39:13 PM PST
by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: big ern
97
posted on
03/28/2004 2:41:17 PM PST
by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
To: InterceptPoint
You are right about Ijaz and his so called 'testimony'.
He is now saying that it is likely clinton did NOT know that Sudan wanted to turn over OBL because the agencies did not like clinton or each other and probably didn't notify the executive branch about the offer from Sudan.
So I guess we are going to be asked not to believe our lying ears where clinton discusses the offer from Sudan.
Talk about changing one's story.....this man will now become the darling of the leftist media.
98
posted on
03/28/2004 2:42:25 PM PST
by
OldFriend
(Always understand, even if you remain among the few)
To: hoosiermama
You guys probably know about this but I just saw a piece on the RNC which has a "Fact Log" to track inaccurate dem statements at www.rnc.org/flog/
99
posted on
03/28/2004 2:43:35 PM PST
by
Bahbah
To: bert
You are right. Ijaz is about to stab us in the back.
100
posted on
03/28/2004 2:43:44 PM PST
by
OldFriend
(Always understand, even if you remain among the few)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 261-277 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson