Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MJY1288
then why has Bush dropped 7 points in the polls in only 3 days? You dont understand the onslaught going on here. This is a slow motion assassination
19 posted on 03/26/2004 10:33:15 PM PST by raloxk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: raloxk
"You don't understand the onslaught going on here. This is slow motion assassination." AH....back with your tired 'ole "positive" spin.
24 posted on 03/26/2004 10:40:14 PM PST by bornintexas (..Release your military records, John F'n Kerry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: raloxk
Who says the polls are accurate?

People were multi-posting the latest Rasmussen poll,the other day. Rasmussen was 100% inaccurate, all through the 2000 election, yet many people here,now, were taking it as gospel.

26 posted on 03/26/2004 10:42:28 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: raloxk; Peach
Why is it that new posters are always so negative against Pres Bush? Does make one wonder!

Much to your dismay, watch his poll numbers climb again as Clarke is proven to be a first class Liar and Clymer! Polls are meaningless at this time in the election cycle except to RATs who love to tout them.

John "Botox" Kerry is in for the fight of his life and he won't know what hit him because of his arrogance until it is way too late. Maybe he should ask Ma Richards about the Texan that occupies the White House! There is a saying "Don't Mess with Texas" and Kerry and the RATs should heed. The RATs are despicable, arrogant bunch of liars. BTW Clarke's buddy is Kerry's foreign policy advisor -- wonder what Americans will think when they read that.

Out here in the Heartland, our paper, The Oklahoman, has already put out an editorial about the lowlife Clark as follows:

Oklahoman Editorial: Blame game
2004-03-26

WE hope the 9/11 commission's investigation into the intelligence/security failures that let terrorists attack this country in 2001 produces substantial recommendations that will help make America safer in the future.

Frankly, if the panel manages that, we'll be surprised. The committee's two-day hearing this week in Washington had its moments, but overall it looked like politics -- not producing findings that will enhance national security -- was the primary focus. Commissioners on both sides got in their shots, but it seemed like Democrats were intent on depicting the Bush administration -- in office less than eight months when the terrorists struck -- as asleep at the wheel in the summer of 9/11. Testimony of former White House special assistant Richard Clarke, who has a new book that accuses President Bush of not paying enough attention to terrorism, played into that strategy.

Clarke appears to be an earnest man, but his opinions are debatable. Commissioner Slade Gorton cut to the bottom line when he got Clarke to concede that even if the young Bush administration adopted every one of his recommendations, the 9/11 attacks still would have occurred.

It took colossal intelligence failures for 9/11 to be planned and executed without detection by multibillion-dollar federal agencies charged with preventing the same. The commission's real contribution will be in looking to the future, not dwelling on assigning blame, as if anyone with a pre-9/11 mind-set could have anticipated such an attack.

Hindsight is 20-20, but it plays tricks on memories. Some commissioners suggested pre-emptive strikes against al-Qaida in Afghanistan could have been tried, only to be reminded by Bush and Clinton administration officials that before 9/11 it would have been impossible to generate support in Congress or in the international community for such an action.

That's why it would have been better to get the investigation over with long ago, or put it off until after the election. It's just too easy for it to veer off into the political, the irrelevant or both.


http://www.newsok.com/cgi-bin/show_article?ID=1205582&TP=getarticle

27 posted on 03/26/2004 10:43:28 PM PST by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- Support Bush-Cheney '04 -- Losing is not an Option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: raloxk
LOL, You must be new at this! 7 point drops this far out from November mean very little.

Step back from the infighting a minute and look at the big picture. We have an economy on the rise and all indicators show a high probability of long term growth, We have home ownership at the highest level ever. For the first time in our countries history home ownership is above 50%.

We have interest rates at an all time low.

Inflation doesn't exist.

New construction is not at the level it was, but still above anything the 90's gave us.

Employment has no place to go but up and despite all the hand wringers out there, the Employment numbers will be way up by mid summer.

The Democrats know this and their only hope is to discredit George W. Bush's leadership during one the most trying times this Nation has ever faced. By November, the American people will have had enough of the negativity from the left, and they will show their contempt for these power hungry socialist by voting for a man who has more Character and integrity in his baby toe than John Kerry could ever dream of having. That Man is George W. Bush and he will win in a landslide of monumental proportions

31 posted on 03/26/2004 10:50:16 PM PST by MJY1288 (When Faced With a Choice as Simple as Night or Day, John Kerry Chooses Dusk and Dawn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: raloxk
This is a slow motion assassination.

Accompanied by an attempted media coup.

98 posted on 03/27/2004 2:35:13 AM PST by patj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson