To: GulliverSwift
"As they try to discredit Clarke, they are running into journalists who have known him for years. Most reporters came away trusting Clarke. Credible?” asked one reporter. “I think he is.”
One problem, folks. Most Americans don't believe the journalists or reporters vouching for him are credible either.
Qwinn
10 posted on
03/26/2004 10:17:08 PM PST by
Qwinn
To: Qwinn
Most Americans don't believe the journalists or reporters vouching for him are credible either. Bingo! Looks like the media has the same ego as Clark. Not sure I know anyone that trusts the national media!
21 posted on
03/26/2004 10:35:53 PM PST by
PhiKapMom
(AOII Mom -- Support Bush-Cheney '04 -- Losing is not an Option!)
To: Qwinn
Those same journalists thought Clinton was credible, too.
34 posted on
03/26/2004 10:56:00 PM PST by
cyncooper
("The 'War on Terror ' is not a figure of speech")
To: Qwinn
"...One problem, folks. Most Americans don't believe the journalists or reporters vouching for him are credible either."
Amen. The credibility and objectivity of the press seems to be getting worse. I'd like to think more Americans are waking up to that fact.
-- Joe
To: Qwinn
"One problem, folks. Most Americans don't believe the journalists or reporters vouching for him are credible either."
How I wish I could believe that.
123 posted on
03/28/2004 12:26:39 PM PST by
Paulie
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson