Replies

There's some stuff in this article I haven't seen before, and I thought I knew most of what was to know about this case.

Still more evidence of FBI stonewalling and refusal to take evidence. I don't see how the new trial can bring any of this to light as long as these same FBI agents are still in the FBI, and many of them have been promoted for helping clinton and Reno cover up what really happened. They are hardly likely to testify if it will demonstrate their own involvement. They have a huge investment in continuing to cover this up.

Nothing short of a serious shakeup of the FBI by a really strong director like Rudy Giuliani can possibly fix this mess. And the CIA and BATF are known to be involved too.

Me too. I live in OK, I followed Jayna's stories and reporting as they happened. I don't ever recall the detail about the motel owner's testimony, to me a truly compelling story. Plus, the license plate. What was the number, who did it belong to, why in the hell didn't the FBI look at this tag? The story about the diesel fumes ring true to anyone who has worked around trucks at all. Also, the story about the other parties with McVeigh, it is very compelling.

As I have posted here before, I was only about 5 miles away from downtown, so the cloud immediately after the blast. Probably within about 5 minutes, it was broadcast that the FBI had an APB out for a brown pickup with two middle eastern men driving fast away from the scene. How in the hell did this get started if there was not some truth to it, if someone did not see such a thing.

And as looney as Clarke is, there was something that intrigued me. He stated McVeigh's bombs did not work prior to going to Phillipines. I didn't know they knew he had tried to test bombs before. Clarke places McVeigh in the Phillipines same time with Ramzi, plus Phillipines has huge Islam contingency, Abu Sayaff, Nichols has Phillipino wife.

The Democrats are afraid of this story. My feeling is that Clinton knew that an active participation by Iraquis would demand action, and he did not want military action to distract from his focus on the economy, aside from the fact that I don't think he had the stomach, moral conviction, to fight a just war. If there is a connection made, and it is shown that Clinton administration gave a directive not to follow certain leads, Clinton's life service would be negated and known only for what is at best a dereliction of duty, and at worst, a treasonous act.