Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Local atheist: Contested [pledge] phrase is a hate crime
Minneapolis Star Tribune ^ | March 25, 2004 | Kevin Diaz

Posted on 03/26/2004 8:28:01 AM PST by Schatze

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Marie Alena Castle, a Minneapolis atheist, contends that the phrase "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance is a hate crime.

Not one to stand idly by in the face of perceived injustice, the 77-year-old former Catholic has written a long brief to the U.S. Supreme Court in support of California atheist Michael Newdow, who urged the justices Wednesday to drop "under God" from the pledge.

Castle's brief is one of more than 50 that have been submitted in the case, which tests the constitutional prohibition on the official establishment of religion.

But Castle's is the only one that sets forth the thesis that Congress put "under God" into the pledge out of hostility toward atheists.

Supporters of the current pledge -- backed by the Bush administration -- argue that it merely reflects the role that religion has played in the nation's history and that it is more of a civic ritual than a religious one.

A retired business and technical writer with no background in law, Castle rests her argument on congressional records dating to 1954, at the height of the Cold War, when Congress inserted "under God" into the pledge.

She cites a speech by Congressman Louis Rabaut, the Michigan Democrat who sponsored the addition of the two-word phrase. He said: "You may argue from dawn to dusk about differing political, economic and social systems, but the fundamental issue which is the unbridgeable gap between America and Communist Russia is a belief in Almighty God . . ."

Given the level of hostility at the time, Castle said, "it is not an overstatement to call it a hate crime."

Castle's is the only atheist brief from Minnesota, the headquarters of a 300-member national group that she calls Atheists for Human Rights. She said the history of the pledge underscores how atheists have often been villified and attacked as "an unpopular group."

(Excerpt) Read more at startribune.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: atheists; churchandstate; hatecrime; hypersensitivity; pledge; pledgeofallegiance; undergod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-307 next last
... Castle said, "it is not an overstatement to call it a hate crime."

For libs, anything they disagree with is a hate crime.

1 posted on 03/26/2004 8:28:01 AM PST by Schatze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Schatze
Where do these people come from?
2 posted on 03/26/2004 8:30:04 AM PST by NCjim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
Where do these people come from?

The bowels of Hell.

3 posted on 03/26/2004 8:31:47 AM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Schatze

4 posted on 03/26/2004 8:32:57 AM PST by Calpernia (http://members.cox.net/classicweb/Heroes/heroes.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10
No, that's where they are going.

/hatespeechoff
5 posted on 03/26/2004 8:34:16 AM PST by Freemeorkillme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Schatze
What this woman seems to forget, is that philosophers such as Locke, Jefferson, and Aquinos all believed that the rights of individuals COME FROM GOD.

The Constitution limits the government from infringing on these rights- they are NOT granted by the government.

So her "right" she claims is being violated, as an atheist, comes from God.

Don't you love the irony?
6 posted on 03/26/2004 8:35:16 AM PST by Lunatic Fringe (John F-ing Kerry??? NO... F-ING... WAY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
The Iron Range ?
7 posted on 03/26/2004 8:36:02 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Schatze
Atheists for Human Rights

More like Atheists Against Free Speech

8 posted on 03/26/2004 8:37:03 AM PST by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schatze
He said: "You may argue from dawn to dusk about differing political, economic and social systems, but the fundamental issue which is the unbridgeable gap between America and Communist Russia is a belief in Almighty God . . ."

Given the level of hostility at the time, Castle said, "it is not an overstatement to call it a hate crime."

It is a hate crime to be against Communism. The amazing part is it was a Democrat who inserted the phrase and correctly pointed out the 'unbridgeable gap'. If a Democrat did that today, they would be tarred and feathered.

9 posted on 03/26/2004 8:38:52 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Is it just me, or are these elderly cranks the most hateful liberals out there?
10 posted on 03/26/2004 8:42:27 AM PST by Belisaurius ("Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, Ted" - Joseph Kennedy 1958)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Schatze; redhead; Notwithstanding; nickcarraway; Romulus; HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity; ...
Not one to stand idly by in the face of perceived injustice, the 77-year-old former Catholic has written a long brief to the U.S. Supreme Court in support of California atheist Michael Newdow, who urged the justices Wednesday to drop "under God" from the pledge.

News Advisory

MARCH 22, 2004
For Release Immediately
CONTACT: Marie Alena Castle, Communications Director

Atheists Call "Under God" in Pledge a "Hate Crime"

On March 24, when atheist Michael Newdow begins arguing his case before the U.S. Supreme Court against keeping "under God" in the pledge of allegiance, he will have among his supporters Atheists For Human Rights (AFHR), based in Minneapolis, MN. AFHR, assisted by attorney Jerrold M. Gorski, Anaheim, CA, has submitted an amicus curiae (friend of the court) brief in support of Newdow's challenge. Read and download the amicus curiae brief on this website in PDF format.

The brief argues that the sole purpose of inserting "under God" in the pledge was a desire to harm American citizens who were atheists. Marie Alena Castle, communications director for AFHR said, "We researched the congressional record for that time and found that hatred of atheists was the overriding motive for changing the pledge. Given the level of hostility, it is not an overstatement to call it a hate crime. For example, when Rep. Louis C. Rabaut introduced the bill in the House on Feb. 12, 1954, he said, '...You may argue from dawn to dusk about differing political, economic, and social systems, but the fundamental issue which is the unbridgeable gap between America and Communist Russia is a belief in Almighty God.' He then went on to charge atheism with being the root of 'the evil weed' of communism, materialism and political dictatorship. He said, 'An atheistic American, ...is a contradiction in terms' and affirmed that only 'under God' can there be 'liberty and justice for all.'"

The brief cites a number of such examples, including the Civil Rights Act of 1963. During debate on the Act, the following amendment was offered: "Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, it shall not be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to refuse to hire and employ any person because of said person's atheistic practices and beliefs." The amendment was debated on February 8, 1964, in the House, where it passed 137 to 98, but it failed in the Senate.

The AFHR brief cites a precedence for removal of "under God" in the Lawrence v. Texas sodomy decision. In that case, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor based her ruling for reversal of Alabama's anti-sodomy statute in part on its enactment being a "a bare desire to harm an unpopular group." The AFHR brief points out that the same rationale can be applied to "under God" in the pledge.

"We think most Americans would be dismayed to know that 'under God' went into the pledge, not as a well-intentioned religious sentiment, but as a deliberate, mean-spirited attack on decent citizens who happened to be nonreligious," Castle said. "To leave that phrase in is an insult, not just to nonbelievers, but to every fair-minded believer as well. Neither religion nor democracy are well-served when God beliefs are used as a club to enforce conformity in matters of religious and political opinion."

Read and download the amicus curiae brief on this website in PDF format.

* * * * *

Catholic Ping - let me know if you want on/off this list


11 posted on 03/26/2004 8:49:10 AM PST by NYer (Prayer is the Strength of the Weak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10
What percentage of this country is atheist? Why should the vast majority have to bend over for them?
12 posted on 03/26/2004 8:50:50 AM PST by broadsword (The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for Democrats to get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: broadsword
it's just that same old "freedom from religion" argument again
13 posted on 03/26/2004 8:53:33 AM PST by been called a cynic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Schatze
I suppose forcing your child into a controversy over a pledge that she is willing to say, and divorcing your wife who believes in God is an act of love. People willing to destroy their families over their own political agenda aren't people who we should respect.
14 posted on 03/26/2004 8:56:02 AM PST by man of Yosemite ("When a man decides to do something everyday, that's about when he stops doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: broadsword
Heard the percentages on the radio, yesterday I believe, the percentage of atheists to those who believe in God is VERY small.

I, too, wonder why the majority is forced to take what to the minority is able to force on them. Maybe it's just that the minority is the obnoxious squeaky wheel & the majority is too well-mannered to protest.
15 posted on 03/26/2004 8:56:22 AM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: man of Yosemite
ah, but it's the principle of the matter... /sarcasm off
16 posted on 03/26/2004 8:57:49 AM PST by been called a cynic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: madison10
"The bowels of Hell."

I think this is more likely where she is going than where she came from.

17 posted on 03/26/2004 8:59:29 AM PST by DaiHuy (MUST HAVE JUST BEEN BORN THAT WAY...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Schatze
"it is not an overstatement to call it a hate crime."

Before you go off on all us atheists, remember that you Christians have your wackos too.

18 posted on 03/26/2004 9:01:50 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: broadsword
What percentage of this country is atheist?

It's .006 percent (six-tenths of 1 percent). America is truly suffering under the tyranny of the minority.

19 posted on 03/26/2004 9:03:15 AM PST by Schatze (It's better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
But you have to consider that the freest most successful country on earth was built by Christians and no society on earth was ever built by atheists. We are no threat to you.
20 posted on 03/26/2004 9:04:22 AM PST by broadsword (The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for Democrats to get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-307 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson