To: Coop
Someone got to Clarke. [I wouldn't necessarily say it was Hillary's team, but then I probably don't have to say that anyway.]
Hillary and Clarke both have the same publisher. Is if a far stretch to assume that 'someone' offered Clarke a financial guarantee, if he book were slanted in a certain direction?
There is more to Clarke's book and the circumstances surrounding it, its author, its contents, its supporters, than has come to light, yet.
12 posted on
03/25/2004 6:32:25 AM PST by
TomGuy
(Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
To: TomGuy
I think someone got to him too. Reminds me a lot of Scott Ritter. I still think that the person who has the most to gain here is Bill Clinton. He is the one with the most to lose with these hearings and with any disclosure regarding intelligence and terrorism during the past decade. He also needs to get Hill into the WH to further cover up what he doesn't want revealed about the abuses of his administration.
36 posted on
03/25/2004 6:46:54 AM PST by
twigs
To: TomGuy
George Soros?
85 posted on
03/25/2004 7:49:53 AM PST by
FreeAtlanta
(never surrender, this is for the kids)
To: TomGuy
Just making sure Kerry/Clinton doesn't have to face Bush/Rice in the debates and election.
180 posted on
03/27/2004 1:21:07 PM PST by
des
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson